Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T01:22:02.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Transmission of Legal Precedent Across the Australian State Supreme Courts Over the Twentieth Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Russell Smyth  and
Vinod Mishra
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article considers several possible determinants of the transmission of legal precedent across Australian state supreme courts over the course of the twentieth century. The study finds that that the transmission of legal precedent is higher between State supreme courts that are more physically proximate and between state supreme courts in which a majority of judges in both courts are appointed by conservative governments. The study further finds that having an intermediate trial court and providing appointments to the High Court of Australia are correlated with whether a state is a source of interstate citations or a cue sender.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , March 2011 , pp. 139 - 170
Copyright
© 2011 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Funding for this project was provided by grants from the Department of Economics and the Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University. We thank Chantelle Casey, Emily Hart, Amy Henderson, Adel Mohammad, Emily Stubbs, and Trent Wiltshire for research assistance on this project. We also thank two anonymous referees for detailed comments on an earlier version of this article.

References

References

Atkins, Burton M. (1991) “Party Capability Theory as an Explanation for Intervention Behavior in the English Court of Appeal,” 35 American J. of Political Science 881–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, Burton M., & Glick, Henry R. (1976) “Environmental and Structural Variables as Determinants of Issues in State Courts of Last Resort,” 20 American J. of Political Science 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008a) Australian Historical Population Statistics: Population by Sex, States and Territories, 30 June, 1901 onward. ABS Cat. No. 3105.0.65.001.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008b) Australian Historical Population Statistics: Population by Capital City and Balance of State, States and Territories, 30 June, 1901 onward. ABS Cat. No. 3105.0.65.001.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2008c) Australian Historical Population Statistics: Population and Sex by Country of Birth, States and Territories, 30 June, 1901 onward. ABS Cat. No. 3105.0.65.001.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence, & Canon, Bradley C. (1982) “State Supreme Courts as Activists: New Doctrines in the Law of Torts,” in Porter, M. & Tarr, G. A., eds., State Supreme Courts: Policymakers in the Federal System. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, Mita, & Smyth, Russell (2001a) “The Determinants of Judicial Influence and Prestige: Some Empirical Evidence From the High Court of Australia,” 30 J. of Legal Studies 223–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharya, Mita (2001b) “Aging and Productivity Among Judges: Some Empirical Evidence From the High Court of Australia,” 40 Australian Economic Papers 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Robert C., & Smythe, Donald J. (2008) “The Structure of American Legal Institutions and the Diffusion of Wrongful Discharge Laws, 1978–1999,” 42 Law & Society Rev. 833–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshield, Anthony, et al. (2001) “Privy Council,” in Blackshield, A. et al., eds., Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia. Melbourne: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory (1983) “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts,” 5 Political Behavior 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory (1985) “The Transmission of Legal Precedent: A Study of State Supreme Courts,” 79 American Political Science Rev. 178–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory (1988) “Legal Precedent: Structures of Communication Between State Supreme Courts,” 10 Social Networks 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., & Baum, Lawrence (1981) “Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovation: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines,” 75 American Political Science Rev. 975–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., & Gulati, G. Mitu (2008) “Bias in Judicial Citations: A Window Into the Behavior of Judges?” 37 J. of Legal Studies 87–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Stephen J., et al. (2009) “Judicial Evaluations and Information Forcing: Ranking State High Courts and Their Judges,” 58 Duke Law J. 1313–82.Google Scholar
Comparato, Scott A. (2002) “On the Reputation of State Supreme Courts Revisited.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., & March, James G. (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., & Tufte, Edward R. (1973) Size and Democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Daniels, Stephen (1988) “A Tangled Tale: Studying the State Supreme Courts,” 22 Law & Society Rev. 833–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Simon (2001) “Appointment of Justices,” in Blackshield, A. et al., eds., Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia. Melbourne: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fausten, Dietrich, et al. (2007) “A Century of Citation Practice on the Supreme Court of Victoria,” 31 Melbourne University Law Rev. 733–804.Google Scholar
Fricke, Graeme. (1986) Judges of the High Court. Melbourne: Hutchison.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence, et al. (1981) “State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation,” 33 Stanford Law Rev. 773–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleeson, Murray (2007) “The Influence of the Privy Council on Australia,” 29 Australian Bar Rev. 123–35.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R. (1971) Supreme Courts in State Politics: An Investigation of the Judicial Role. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Glick, Henry R., & Hays, Scott P. (1991) “Innovation and Reinvention in State Policymaking: Theory and the Evolution of Living Wills Laws,” 53 J. of Politics 835–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greene, William H. (2002) Econometric Analysis, 5th ed. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar M. (1995) Basic Econometrics, 3d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hagan, John P. (1988) “Patterns of Activism on State Supreme Courts,” 18 Publius 97–115.Google Scholar
Harris, Peter (1982) “Structural Change in the Communication of Precedent Among State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 4 Social Networks 201–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Peter (1985) “Ecology and Culture in the Communication of Precedent Among State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970,” 19 Law & Society Rev. 449–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Robert J. (2009) “The Impact of Judicial Opinion Language on the Transmission of Federal Circuit Court Precedents,” 43 Law & Society Rev. 127–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Charles J. (1987) “Law, Politics and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Courts' Use of Supreme Court Decisions,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 325–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M., & Posner, Richard (1976) “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis,” 19 J. of Law and Economics 249–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landes, William M., et al. (1998) “Judicial Influence: A Citation Analysis of Federal Courts of Appeals Judges,” 27 J. of Legal Studies 271–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, James M. (1997) “Regional Leaders in the Diffusion of Tort Innovations Among the American States,” 27 Publius 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitra, Pushkar, & Smyth, Russell (2005) “Determinants of Retirement on the High Court of Australia,” 81 Economic Record 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcolm, David (2001) “State Supreme Courts,” in Blackshield, A. et al., eds., Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia. Melbourne: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Donald R., & Stimson, James A. (1975) Yeas and Nays: Normal Decision Making in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
McCormick, Peter (1994) “The Evolution of Coordinate Precedential Authority in Canada: Interprovincial Citations of Judicial Authority, 1922–92,” 32 Osgoode Hall Law J. 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John H. (1954) “The Authority of Authority: What the California Supreme Court Cited in 1950,” 6 Stanford Law Rev. 613–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, Rodney L. (1936) “Judicial Influence,” 30 American Political Science Rev. 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Paresh K., & Smyth, Russell (2005) “The Consensual Norm on the High Court of Australia: 1904–2001,” 26 International Political Science Rev. 147–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narayan, Paresh K., & Smyth, Russell (2007) “What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach,” 4 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 401–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, Jason L. (2006) Inside the Mason Court Revolution: The High Court of Australia Transformed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pierce, Jason L. (2008) “Institutional Cohesion in the High Court of Australia: Do American Theories Travel Well Down Under?” 46 Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 318–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Mary C. (1982) “State Supreme Courts and the Legacy of the Warren Court: Some Old Inquiries for a New Situation,” in Porter, M. & Tarr, G. A., eds., State Supreme Courts: Policymakers in the Federal System. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Sawer, Geoffrey (1967) Australian Federalism in the Courts. Melbourne: Melbourne Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Richard D., & Miller, James C. (1963) “Legal Evolution and Societal Complexity,” 70 American J. of Sociology 159–69.Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron E. (1989) “Exceptionalism in American Politics,” 22 PS: Political Science and Politics 588–94.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1965) “Stability and Change in Judicial Decision-Making: Incrementalism or Stare Decisis?,” 2 Law in Transition Q. 134–57.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1970) “Decentralized Decision-Making in the Law of Torts,” in Ulmer, S. S., ed., Political Decision Making. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin (1972) “Toward a Theory of Stare Decisis,” 1 J. of Legal Studies 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam (2006) “Making Itself At Home: Understanding Foreign Law in Domestic Jurisprudence—The Indian Case,” 24 Berkeley J. of International Law 218–72.Google Scholar
Smyth, Russell (2000) “The ‘Haves and the Have Nots’: An Empirical Study of the Rational Actor and Party Capability Hypotheses in the High Court 1948–99,” 35 Australian J. of Political Science 255–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell (2001) “Judicial Interaction on the Latham Court: A Quantitative Study of Voting Patterns on the High Court 1935–50,” 47 Australian J. of Politics and History 330–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell (2002) “Historical Consensual Norms in the High Court,” 37 Australian J. of Politics and History 255–66.Google Scholar
Smyth, Russell (2003) “Explaining Historical Dissent Rates in the High Court of Australia,” 41 Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell (2004) “What Explains Variation in Dissent Rates?,” 26 Sydney Law Rev. 221–40.Google Scholar
Smyth, Russell (2005) “The Role of Attitudinal, Institutional and Environmental Factors in Explaining Variations in the Dissent Rate on the High Court of Australia,” 40 Australian J. of Political Science 519–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell, & Bhattacharya, Mita (2003a) “What Determines Judicial Prestige? An Empirical Analysis for Judges of the Federal Court of Australia,” 5 American Law and Economics Rev. 233–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell, & Bhattacharya, Mita (2003b) “How Fast Do Old Judges Slow Down? A Life Cycle Study of Aging and Productivity in the Federal Court of Australia,” 23 International Rev. of Law and Economics 141–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell, & Fausten, Dietrich (2008) “Coordinate Citations Between Australian State Supreme Courts Over the Twentieth Century,” 34 Monash Univ. Law Rev. 53–74.Google Scholar
Smyth, Russell, & Mishra, Vinod (2009) “The Publication Decisions of Judges on the County Court of Victoria,” 85 Economic Record 462–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Russell, & Narayan, Paresh K. (2004) “Hail to the Chief! Leadership and Structural Change in the Level of Consensus on the High Court of Australia,” 1 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Neal (1983) “The Methodology of Judicial Behavior Research,” A Review and Critique, 5 Political Behavior 51–82.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1969) “The Diffusion of Innovations Among the American States,” 63 American Political Science Rev. 880–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1971) “Innovation in State Politics,” in Jacob, H. & Vines, K. N., eds., Politics in the American States. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Walsh, David J. (1997) “On the Meaning and Pattern of Legal Citations: Evidence From State Wrongful Discharge Precedent Cases,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 337–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiden, David L. (2007) “Judicial Decision-Making in Comparative Perspective: Ideology, Law and Activism in Constitutional Courts.” Ph.D diss., University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Winterton, George (1987) “Appointments of Federal Court Judges in Australia,” 16 Melbourne Univ. Law Rev. 185–212.Google Scholar
Wood, Rebecca (2001) “Disagreement on the Australian High Court: Reconsidering the Legalist Model.” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, San Francisco, 29 Aug.–3 Sept.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Australia Act 1986 (U.K.).Google Scholar
Australia Acts (Request). Series of acts passed by different Australian state parliaments.Google Scholar
Australia (Request and Consent) Act 1985 (Cth).Google Scholar
Human Rights Act 1998 (U.K.).Google Scholar
Judiciary Act 1903.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002).Google Scholar
Lange v. Australian Broadcasting Commission, 189 CLR 520 (1997).Google Scholar
Lawrence v, Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).Google Scholar
Roper v Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar