Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T11:15:24.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Victim, perpetrator, neither: Attitudes on deservingness and culpability in immigration law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Jamie Rowen*
Affiliation:
Department of Legal Studies and Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Scott Blinder
Affiliation:
Department of Legal Studies and Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Rebecca Hamlin
Affiliation:
Department of Legal Studies and Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
*
Jamie Rowen, Department of Legal Studies and Political Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA., Email: jrowen@umass.edu

Abstract

This study examines whether there is popular support for a restrictive immigration policy aimed at denying safe haven to human rights abusers and those affiliated with terrorism. We designed a public opinion survey experiment that asks respondents to evaluate whether low level or high-level Taliban members who otherwise qualify for refugee status deserve immigration benefits. We found that a majority of respondents did not immediately deny a visa to low-level worker. Looking at respondents' explanations for their decision, we find two distinct clusters of reasons that we classify as either circumstantial–focused on the particularities of the case–or categorical–focused on general attributes of the applicant. We suggest that domestic and international criminal law logics about acts and intentions, as well as roles and responsibilities, are reflected in beliefs about deservingness in this distinct immigration context, and may support more generous attitudes toward those seeking refugee status. Many respondents using circumstantial reasoning saw a distinction between the jobs potential immigrants have done in their pasts and what they actually believe, underscoring the fraught dynamics of armed conflict in which people may be swept up in violence they do not support.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2022 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Rowen, Jamie, Scott Blinder, and Rebecca Hamlin. 2022. “Victim, Perpetrator, Neither: Attitudes on Deservingness and Culpability in Immigration Law.” Law & Society Review 56(3): 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12619

References

REFERENCES

Abdelaaty, Lamis, and Steele, Liza G. 2020. “Explaining Attitudes Toward Refugees and Immigrants in Europe.” Political Studies 70: 110130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrego, Leisy J., and Negrón-Gonzales, Genevieve. 2020. We Are Not Dreamers: Undocumented Scholars Theorize Undocumented Life in the United States. Raleigh, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Adida, Claire L., Lo, Adeline, and Platas, Melina R. 2019. “Americans Preferred Syrian Refugees Who Are Female, English-Speaking, and Christian on the Eve of Donald Trump's Election.” PLoS One 14(10): e0222504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alicke, Mark D. 1992. “Culpable Causation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(5): 368378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alicke, Mark D. 2000. “Culpable Control and the Psychology of Blame.” Psychological Bulletin 126(4): 556574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alicke, Mark D., Buckingham, Justin, Zell, Ethan, and Davis, Teresa. 2008. “Culpable Control and Counterfactual Reasoning in the Psychology of Blame.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(10): 13711381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Audette, Nicole, Horowitz, Jeremy, and Michelitch, Kristin. “Personal Narratives Reduce Negative Attitudes toward Refugees and Immigrant Outgroups: Evidence from Kenya.” Vanderbilt University Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Working Paper 1 2020.Google Scholar
Bansak, Kirk, Hainmueller, Jens, and Hangartner, Dominik. 2016. “How Economic, Humanitarian, and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes toward Asylum Seekers.” Science 354(6309): 217222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckett, Katherine, and Evans, Heather. 2015. “Crimmigration at the Local Level: Criminal Justice Processes in the Shadow of Deportation.” Law & Society Review 49(1): 241277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Scott. 2015. “Imagined Immigration: The Impact of Different Meanings of ‘Immigrants’ in Public Opinion and Policy Debates in Britain.” Political Studies 63: 80100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracic, Ana. 2016. “Reaching the Individual: EU Accession, NGOs, and Human Rights.” American Political Science Review 110(3): 530546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracic, Ana, and Murdie, Amanda. 2020. “Human Rights Abused? Terrorist Labeling and Individual Reactions to Call to Action.” Political Research Quarterly 73(4): 878892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Citrin, Jack, Green, Donald P., Muste, Christopher, and Wong, Cara. 1997. “Public Opinion Toward Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” The Journal of Politics 59(3): 858881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de D., Coninck. 2020. “Migrant Categorizations and European Public Opinion: Diverging Attitudes towards Immigrants and Refugees.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(9): 16671686.Google Scholar
Drumbl, Mark. 2007. Atrocity, Punishment, and International Law. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espenshade, Thomas J., and Hempstead, Katherine. 1996. “Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration.” International Migration Review 30(2): 535570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esses, Victoria M. 2021. “Prejudice and Discrimination toward Immigrants.” Annual Review of Psychology 72: 503531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esses, Victoria M., Hamilton, Leah K., and Gaucher, Danielle. 2017. “The Global Refugee Crisis: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications for Improving Public Attitudes and Facilitating Refugee Resettlement.” Social Issues and Policy Review 11(1): 78123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facchini, Giovanni, and Mayda, Anna Maria. 2009. “Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence across Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91(2): 295314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Robert. 2011. “Acceptable and Unacceptable Immigrants: How Opposition to Immigration in Britain Is Affected by Migrants' Region of Origin.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37: 10171037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gans, H. J. 1995. The Undeserving Poor.: The Underclass and Antipoverty Policy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Biggers, Daniel R., and Hendry, David J. 2017. “Self-Interest, Beliefs, and Policy Opinions: Understanding how Economic Beliefs Affect Immigration Policy Preferences.” Political Research Quarterly 70(1): 155171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getmansky, Anna, Sınmazdemir, Tolga, and Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2018. “Refugees, Xenophobia, and Domestic Conflict: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Turkey.” Journal of Peace Research 55(4): 491507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Barney G., and Strauss, Anselm. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
Hager, Anselm, and Veit, Susanne. 2019. “Attitudes Toward Asylum Seekers: Evidence from Germany.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83(2): 412422.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hiscox, Michael. 2010. “Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-Skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” American Political Science Review 104(1): 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hopkins, Daniel J. 2015. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 529548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin and Rowen. 2020. “From Redress to Prevention: How the International Politics of No Safe Haven Became the Politics of Not in My Backyard.” Human Rights Quarterly 42(3): 623645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamlin, Rebecca. 2021. Crossing: How We Label and React to People on the Move. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haner, Murat, Sloan, Melissa M., Cullen, Francis T., Graham, Amanda, Jonson, Cheryl Lero, Kulig, Teresa C., and Aydın, Ömer. 2021. “Making America Safe Again: Public Support for Policies to Reduce Terrorism.” Deviant Behavior 42(10): 12091227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Anthony F., and Richards, Lindsay. 2020. “Contested Boundaries: Consensus and Dissensus in European Attitudes to Immigration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46(3): 489511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy, and Sinno, Abdulkader. 2017. “Different Groups, Different Threats: Public Attitudes towards Immigrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43(3): 339358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, García, and Cuauhtémoc, César. 2018. “Deconstructing Crimmigration.” UC Davis Law Review 51: 197254.Google Scholar
Karp, David A. 2009. “Setting the Persecutor Bar for Political Asylum after Negusie.” Florida Law Review 61(4): 933943.Google Scholar
Lagnado, David A., and Gerstenberg, Tobias. 2017. “Causation in Legal and Moral Reasoning.” Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning: 565602.Google Scholar
Lajevardi, Nazita. 2020. Outsiders at Home: The Politics of American Islamophobia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauby, Fanny. 2016. “Leaving the ‘Perfect DREAMer’ behind? Narratives and Mobilization in Immigration Reform.” Social Movement Studies 15(4): 374387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Tyler Anne. 2019. “When “Material” Loses Meaning: Matter of ACM-and the Material Support Bar to Asylum.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 51: 372428.Google Scholar
Leonard, David P. 2001. “Character and Motive in Evidence Law.” Loyola Law Review 34: 439537.Google Scholar
Martinez, Jenny S. 2007. “Understanding Mens Rea in Command Responsibility: From Yamashita to Blaškić and Beyond.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5(3): 638664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Douglas S., and Pren, Karen A. 2012. “Unintended Consequences of US Immigration Policy: Explaining the Post-1965 Surge from Latin America.” Population and Development Review 38(1): 129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McEntire, Kyla Jo, Leiby, Michele, and Krain, Matthew. 2015. “Human Rights Organizations as Agents of Change: An Experimental Examination of Framing and Micromobilization.” American Political Science Review 109(3): 407426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullen, Brian. 2001. “Ethnophaulisms for Ethnic Immigrant Groups.” Journal of Social Issues 57(3): 457475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadler, Janice. 2012. “Blaming as a Social Process: The Influence of Character and Moral Emotion on Blame.” Law and Contemporary Problems 75(2): 131.Google Scholar
Nadler, Janice, and McDonnell, Mary-Hunter. 2012. “Moral Character, Motive, and the Psychology of Blame.” Cornell Law Review 97: 255305.Google Scholar
Nassar, Rita. 2020. “Threat, Prejudice, and White Americans' Attitudes toward Immigration and Syrian Refugee Resettlement.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 5(1): 196220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Anna, and Valverde, Mariana. 2002. “From Deserving Victims to “Masters of Confusion” : Redefining Refugees in the 1990s.” Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie 27(2): 135161.Google Scholar
Quillian, Lincoln. 1995. “Prejudice as a Response to Perceived Group Threat: Population Composition and Anti-Immigrant and Racial Prejudice in Europe.” American Sociological Review 60(4): 586611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, Raea, and Poushter, Jacob. 2019. People around the World Express More Support for Taking in Refugees than Immigrants. Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center report.Google Scholar
Reiter, Keramet, and Coutin, Susan Bibler. 2017. “Crossing Borders and Criminalizing Identity: The Disintegrated Subjects of Administrative Sanctions.” Law & Society Review 51(3): 567601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Darryl. 2017. “A Justification of Command Responsibility.” Criminal Law Forum 28: 633668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Darryl. 2008. “The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 21: 925963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowen, Jamie, and Hamlin, Rebecca. 2018. “The Politics of a New Legal Regime: The Human Rights Violators and War Crimes Unit.” Law and Policy 40(3): 243266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian, Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Luks, Sam. 2019. “CCES Guide 2018.pdf.” CCES Common Content 2018. 1–119. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZSBZ7K/WZWCZ1.Google Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J. 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83(1): 133145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sides, John, and Gross, Kimberly. 2013. “Stereotypes of Muslims and Support for the War on Terror.” The Journal of Politics 75(3): 583598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeulers, Alette. 2019. “Why Serious International Crimes Might Not Seem ‘Manifestly Unlawful’ to Low-Level Perpetrators: A Social–Psychological Approach to Superior Orders.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 17(1): 105123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solan, Lawrence M. 2003. “Cognitive Foundations of the Impulse to Blame.” Brooklyn Law Review 68: 10031030.Google Scholar
Sood, Avani Mehta. 2013. “Motivated Cognition in Legal Judgments—An Analytic Review.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 307325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Lamis and Liza Abdelaaty. 2019. “Ethnic Diversity and Attitudes towards Refugees.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45(11): 18331856.Google Scholar
Stumpf, Juliet. 2006. “The Crimmigration Crisis: Immigrants, Crime, and Sovereign Power, the.” American University Law Review 56(2): 367420.Google Scholar
Tichenor, Daniel J. 2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ticktin, Miriam. 2016. “Thinking beyond Humanitarian Borders.” Social Research: An International Quarterly. 83(2): 255271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, Stefan, and Tavory, Iddo. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research.” Sociological Theory 30(3): 167186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosh, Sarah. 2019. “Drugs, Crime, and Aggravated Felony Deportations: Moral Panic Theory and the Legal Construction of the “Criminal Alien”.” Critical Criminology. 27(2): 329345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turper, Sedef, Iyengar, Shanto, Aarts, Kees, and van Gerven, Minna. 2015. “Who Is less Welcome?: The Impact of Individuating Cues on Attitudes towards Immigrants.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41(2): 239259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Beth, Schaack. 2008. “Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals.” Georgetown Law Journal 97: 119192.Google Scholar
van Elies, Sliedregt. 2007. “Joint Criminal Enterprise as a Pathway to Convicting Individuals for Genocide.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 5(1): 184207.Google Scholar
Verkuyten, Maykel, Mepham, Kieran, and Kros, Mathijs. 2018. “Public Attitudes towards Support for Migrants: The Importance of Perceived Voluntary and Involuntary Migration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 41(5): 901918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John, and Feldman, Stanley. 1992. “A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions Versus Revealing Preferences.” American Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar