Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-24T04:13:27.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Doing the Right Thing? Toward a Postmodern Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Allan C. Hutchinson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“We have learned the answers, all the answers: It is the question that we do not know.”

—Archibald MacLeish (1928)

Joel Handler would have had big problems with Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing, It is an auteurial tour-de-force by way of a postmodern fable for the ages that is self-consciously perplexing and inconclusive. While focusing on the competing imperatives of the pacificism of Martin Luther King's assimilationist politics and the violence of Malcolm X's cultural nationalism, Lee poses the more general and debilitating dilemma that faces those committed to decisive action in an opaque world. In a pivotal scene, the flip and up-and-coming Mookie is harangued by a local and elderly busybody. In hushed and conspiratorial tones, he advises Mookie to “Always do the right thing.” The exasperated Mookie complains, “That's it? Do the right thing? O.K., I got it. I'm gone …” As the film advances to its climactic and chaotic denouement, Mookie is forced to confront the excruciating accuracy and infuriating elusiveness of this absolutely trite piece of sage advice. Determined to “do the right thing,” he acts in a way that both he and almost everyone else will forever question and second-guess. In this appropriately cryptic manner, Lee suggests the fecundity and fragility of political action in a postmodern world.

Type
Comments on Presidential Address
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , 1992 , pp. 773 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to Harry Glasbeek, Pam Carpenter, Brenda Cossman, Lynda Covello, and Rose Della Rocca for comments and support.

References

Binder, Guyora (1991) “What's Left?” 69 Texas Law Rev. 1985.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1980) “Socialism and Autonomous Society,” Telos, No. 43, p. 91.10.3817/0380043091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Barasar (1990) “Rethinking Social Movement Theory,” 20 Socialist Rev. 35.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis (1992) The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Gates, Henry Louis (1990) “Statistical Stigmata,” 11 Cardozo Law Rev. 1275.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, & Jacques, Martin (1989) New Times: The Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1978) Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1986) The Conditions of Discretion: Autonomy, Community, Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel (1992) “Postmodernism, Protest and the New Social Movements,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 695.Google Scholar
Harris, Angela P. (1990) “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory,” 42 Stanford Law Rev. 581.Google Scholar
hooks, bell (1992) Black Looks: Race and Representation Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, Alan (1990) “The Big Fear: Law Confronts Postmodernism,” 35 McGill Law J. 507.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan (1988) Dwelling on the Threshold: Critical Essays on Modern Legal Thought. Toronto: Carswell Co.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan (1989) “The Three R's: Reading/Rorty/Radically,” 103 Harvard Law Rev. 555.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan (1991) “Inessentially Speaking (Is There Politics after Postmodernism?),” 89 Michigan Law Rev. 1549.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan (1992) “Identity Crisis: The Politics of Interpretation,” 26 New England Law Rev. 1173.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto, & Mouffe, Chantal (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a Radical Democratic Politics, trans. Moore, W. & Cammack, P.. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Lee, Spike (with Jones, L.) (1989) “Do the Right Thing: A Spike Lee Joint.”.Google Scholar
Le Guin, Ursula (1989) Dancing at the Edge of the World. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
MacLeish, Archibald (1928) The Hamlet of MacLeish. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1987) “Looking to the Bottom: Critical Legal Studies and Reparations,” 22 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties L. Rev. 323.Google Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J. (1990) “Pragmatism Modified and the False Consciousness Problem,” 63 Southern California Law Rev. 1763.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha (1990) Making All the Difference. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret (1990) “Pragmatist and Feminist,” 63 Southern California Law Rev. 1699.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trakman, Leon E. (1991) Reasoning with the Charter. Toronto: Butterworth's.Google Scholar
Wallace, Michelle (1990) Invisibility Blues: From Pop to Theory. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (1988) Prophetic Fragments. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (1990) The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (1991) “The Limits of Neopragmatism,” in Brint, M. & Weaver, W., eds., Pragmatism in Law and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
White, Lucie (1990) “Subordination, Rhetorical Survival Skills, and Sunday Shoes: Notes on the Hearing of Mrs. G.,” 38 Buffalo Law Rev. 1.Google Scholar