Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T13:40:06.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Donald Black's Sociology of Law: A Critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

David F. Greenberg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper examines the theoretical and empirical adequacy of Donald Black's (1976) The Behavior of Law. The work is found to be logically incoherent and its operationalization of variables problematic. The evidence that bears on its propositions does not consistently support them.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 17 , Issue 2: Special Issue: Psychology and Law , 1983 , pp. 337 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the Conference on Critical Legal Studies in 1980. I am grateful for comments and suggestions on the earlier draft to Piers Beirne, Donald Black, Candace Kruttschnitt, Martha A. Myers, Slawomir M. Redo, Dennis Smith, Stanton Wheeler, Dennis Wrong, and the anonymous journal reviewers. Richard O. Lempert's editorial suggestions were especially valuable.

References

References

BAILEY, William C. (1981) “Inequality in the Legal Order,” 29 Social Problems 51.Google Scholar
BALKAN, Sheila, BERGER, Ronald J. and Janet, SCHMIDT (1980) Crime and Deviance in America: A Critical Approach. Belmont, CA.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
BERNSTEIN, Ilene, William, KELLY and Patricia, DOYLE (1977) “Societal Reaction to Deviants: The Case of Criminal Defendants,” 42 American Sociological Review 743.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1971) “The Social Organization of Arrest,” 23 Stanford Law Review 1087.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1972) “The Boundaries of Legal Sociology,” 81 Yale Law Journal 1086.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1976) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1979) “Comment: Common Sense in the Sociology of Law,” 44 American Sociological Review 18.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1980) The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BOOTH, Allan, JOHNSON, David R. and Harvey M., CHOLDIN (1977) “Correlates of City Crime Rates: Victimization Surveys versus Official Statistics,” 25 Social Problems 187.Google Scholar
BOWERS, William J. and Glenn L., PIERCE (1980) “Arbitrariness and Discrimination under Post-Furman Capital Statutes,” 26 Crime and Delinquency 563.Google Scholar
BOYER, Paul and Ralph, NISSENBAUM (1974) Salem Possessed: The Social Origins of Witchcraft. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
BRAJTHWAJTE, John and David, BILES (1980) “Empirical Verification and Black's The Behavior of Law (Comment on Gottfredson and Hindelang),” 45 American Sociological Review 334.Google Scholar
BURKE, Peter J. and Austin T., TURK (1975) “Factors Affecting Postarrest Dispositions: A Model for Analysis,” 22 Social Problems 313.Google Scholar
CASTBERRY, A. Didrick (1971) “The Ethnic Factor in Criminal Sentencing,” 24 Western Political Quarterly 425.Google Scholar
CHIRICOS, Theodore and Gordon, WALDO (1975) “Socioeconomic Status and Criminal Sentencing: An Empirical Assessment of a Conflict Proposition,” 40 American Sociological Review 753.Google Scholar
CONQUEST, Robert (1973) The Great Terror: Stalin's Purge of the Thirties. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
FARRELL, Ronald A. and Victoria Lynn, SWIGERT (1978) “Legal Disposition of Inter-group and Intra-group Homicides,” 19 Sociological Quarterly 565.Google Scholar
FRIEDELL, M. (1967) “Organizations as Semilattices,” 32 American Sociological Review 46.Google Scholar
FULLER, Lon (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law and Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GIBBS, Jack P. (1972) Sociological Theory Construction. Hinsdale, IL.: Dryden.Google Scholar
GOTTFREDSON, Michael R. and Michael J., HINDELANG (1979a) “A Study of The Behavior of Law” 44 American Sociological Review 3.Google Scholar
Michael J., HINDELANG (1979b) “Theory and Research in the Sociology of Law,” 44 American Sociological Review 27.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David F., KESSLER, Ronald C. and Charles H., LOGAN (1979) “A Panel Model of Crime Rates and Arrest Rates,” 44 American Sociological Review 843.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John (1974) “Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint,” 8 Law and Society Review 357.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John and Ilene N., BERNSTEIN (1979) “Conflict in Context: The Sanctioning of Draft Resisters 1963-76,” 27 Social Problems 109.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John, NAGEL (Bernstein), Ilene H. and Celesta, ALBONETTI (1980) “The Differential Sentencing of White-Collar Offenders in Ten Federal District Courts,” 45 American Sociological Review 802.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, Michael (1969) “Equality under the Law,” 60 Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science 306.Google Scholar
HOGARTH, Jonn (1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLMES, Oliver Wendell Jr. (1897) “The Path of the Law,” 10 Harvard Law Review 457.Google Scholar
KLECK, Gary (1981) “Racial Discrimination in Criminal Sentencing,” 46 American Sociological Review 783.Google Scholar
KRIESBERG, Louis (1979) Social Inequality. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
KROHN, Marvin D. (1976) “Inequality, Unemployment and Crime: A Cross-National Analysis,” 17 Sociological Quarterly 303.Google Scholar
KRUTTSCHNITT, Candace (1980-81) “Social Status and Sentences of Female Offenders,” 15 Law and Society Review 247.Google Scholar
KURTZ, Donald V. (1978) “The Legitimation of the Aztec State,” in Claessen, Henri J.M. and Skalnik, Peter (eds.), The Early State. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
LaFREE, Gary D. (1980) “The Effect of Sexual Stratification by Race on Official Reactions to Rape,” 45 American Sociological Review 842.Google Scholar
LEVIN, Martin A. (1972) “Urban Politics and Judicial Behavior,” 1 Journal of Legal Studies 220.Google Scholar
LLEWELLYN, Karl (1951) The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. New York: Oceana.Google Scholar
McNEILL, John T. and Helena M., GAMER (1938) Medieval Handbooks of Penance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
MYERS, Martha A. (1979) “Offended Parties and Official Reactions: Victims and the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants,” 20 Sociological Quarterly 529.Google Scholar
MYERS, Martha A. (1980) “Predicting the Behavior of Law: A Test of Two Models,” 14 Law and Society Review 835.Google Scholar
NADER, Laura (1976) Quotation on book jacket of Donald Black's The Behavior of Law.Google Scholar
NEEDLEMAN, Carolyn (1981) “Discrepant Assumptions in Empirical Research: The Case of Juvenile Court Screening,” 28 Social Problems 247.Google Scholar
NONET, Philippe and Philip, SELZNICK (1978) Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
PEARL, Mike and Marc, KALECH (1982) “Justice—by the Flip of a Coin,” New York Post (February 1) 4.Google Scholar
QUINNEY, Richard (1973) Critique of Legal Order: Crime Control in Capitalist Society. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
RADELET, Michael L. (1981) “Racial Characteristics and the Death Penalty,” 46 American Sociological Review 918.Google Scholar
REID, John (1980) “In the Taught Tradition: The Meaning of Law Two Hundred Years Ago,” 14 Suffolk University Law Review 931.Google Scholar
RUGGIERO, Guido (1980) Violence in Early Renaissance Venice. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
RUSCHE, Georg and Otto, KIRCHHEIMER (1939) Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHOEK, Helmut (1969) Envy: A Theory of Social Behavior. Tr. Michael Glenny and Betty Ross. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
SCHUR, Edwin M. (1975) “Comment,” in Gove, Walter R. (ed.), The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective. Beverly Hills, CA.: Sage.Google Scholar
SCHWARTZ, Joseph E. and Christopher, WINSHIP (1979) “The Welfare Approach to Measuring Inequality.” Preprint, New York: Columbia University Center for the Social Sciences.Google Scholar
SEDOV, Leonid A. (1978) “Angkor: Society and State,” in Claessen, Henri J.M. and Skalnik, Peter (eds.), The Early State. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
SELZNICK, Philip (1968) “The Sociology of Law,” in Sills, David L. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 9. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
SHERMAN, Laurence (1978) “Review: The Behavior of Law” 7 Contemporary Sociology 11.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome (1966) “Social Research on Legality—A Reply to Auerbach,” 1 Law and Society Review 105.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto Mangageira (1976) Law in Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
WILSON, James Q. (1968) “The Police and the Delinquent in Two Cities,” in Wheeler, Stanton (ed.), Controlling Delinquents. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
ZEISEL, Hans (1981) “Racial Bias in the Administration of the Death Penalty: The Florida Experience,” 95 Harvard Law Review 456.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 1972.Google Scholar