Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T04:38:36.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From the Editor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

This editorial represents my views alone, and not those of any author in this issue.

References

BLUMBERG, Abraham S. (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome (1962) Lawyers on Their Own: A Study of Individual Practitioners in Chicago. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
CURRAN, Barbara A. (1978) The Legal Needs of the Public: The Final Report of a National Survey. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1975) “Afterword: Explaining Litigation,” 9 Law & Society Review 347.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1977) “Elegant Models, Empirical Pictures, and the Complexities of Contract,” 11 Law & Society Review 507.Google Scholar
MAYHEW, Leon (1975) “Institutions of Representation: Civil Justice and the Public,” 9 Law & Society Review 401.Google Scholar
MAYHEW, Leon and Albert, REISS Jr. (1969) “The Social Organization of Legal Contacts,” 34 American Sociological Review 309.Google Scholar
ROSENTHAL, Douglas A. (1974) Lawyer and Client: Who's in Charge? New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1977) “Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence,” 11 Law & Society Review 427.Google Scholar
UPHAM, Frank K. (1976) “Litigation and Moral Consciousness in Japan: An Interpretative Analysis of Four Japanese Pollution Suits,” 10 Law & Society Review 579.Google Scholar