Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-09-01T17:05:54.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization as Boundary-Blurring: International and Local Law Firms in China's Corporate Law Market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Sida Liu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The worldwide expansion of international law firms has generated regulatory battles and workplace conflicts in advanced market economies as well as developing countries. This article uses the case of China to explore the changing global–local relationship in the globalization of the legal profession and to understand the role of the government in constituting the corporate law market. The author argues that the globalization of the Chinese corporate law market is a process of boundary-blurring and hybridization, by which local firms become structurally global-looking and global firms receive localized expertise. Boundary-blurring occurs in law firms' workplaces, in lawyers' career trajectories, and in state regulatory policies. It has produced a localized expertise that can be diffused conversely from local firms to global firms and has partially changed their relationship from collaboration to competition. Consequently, it becomes increasingly difficult for the government to make or enforce any substantive policy to clarify the market boundary between these two types of law firms.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 771 - 804
Copyright
© 2008 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Financial support for this project was provided by research fellowships from the University of Chicago, the American Bar Foundation, and the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. I would like to thank Andrew Abbott, Ellen C. Berrey, Robert Dingwall, John Hagan, Terence C. Halliday, John P. Heinz, Elizabeth Mertz, Robert L. Nelson, Randall Peerenboom, Christopher W. Schmidt, Carole Silver, and anonymous reviewers of the Law & Society Review for their comments on earlier drafts. The fieldwork benefited from the enormously helpful support from many of my alumni at Peking University School of Law and other colleagues in Beijing and Shanghai, whose names have to remain anonymous. The American Bar Foundation Research Seminar provided excellent ideas and suggestions for the revision of the article. Needless to say, I am solely responsible for all the errors and problems in the text.

References

References

Abbott, Andrew (1981) “Status and Status Strain in the Professions,” 86 American J. of Sociology 819–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Andrew (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1988) The Legal Profession in England and Wales. Oxford, United Kingdom, and New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1989) American Lawyers. New York and Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1994) “Transnational Law Practice,” 44 Case Western Reserve Law Rev. 737–870.Google Scholar
Beijing Bureau of Justice (2005) Public Announcement on the License Abolition of the Primary Representative of the Coudert Brothers Beijing Office Tao Jingzhou. 8 Oct, Beijing.Google Scholar
Berlant, Jeffrey L. (1975) Profession and Monopoly: A Study of Medicine in the United States and Great Britain. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth H., & Meyer, John W. (2002) “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law,” in Dezalay, Y. & Garth, B., eds., Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, & Drahos, Peter (2000) Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant (1996) Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant, eds. (2002a) Global Prescriptions: The Production, Exportation, and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant, eds. (2002b) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists and the Transformation of Latin-American States. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, & Powell, Walter (1983) “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” 48 American Sociological Rev. 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingwall, Robert (1999) “Professions and Social Order in a Global Society,” 9 International Rev. of Sociology 131–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flood, John (1996) “Megalawyering in the Global Order: The Cultural, Social, and Economic Transformation of Global Legal Practice,” 3 International J. of the Legal Profession 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fourcade, Marion (2006) “The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics,” 112 American J. of Sociology 145–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary E. (2005) Contagious Capitalism: Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. (1983) “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists,” 48 American Sociological Rev. 781–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., & Carruthers, Bruce G. (2007) “The Recursivity of Law: Global Normmaking and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Bankruptcy Regimes,” 112 American J. of Sociology 1135–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., & Osinsky, Pavel (2006) “Globalization of Law,” 32 Annual Rev. of Sociology 19.1–19.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, Gerard (1994) The Commercialisation of Accountancy: Flexible Accumulation and the Transformation of the Service Class. London: Macmillan, and New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Hanlon, Gerard (1999) Lawyers, the State, and the Market: Professionalism Revisited. London: MacMillan Business.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hannan, Michael T., & Freeman, John (1977) “The Population Ecology of Organizations,” 82 American J. of Sociology 929–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, Amos (1968) “Human Ecology,” in Sills, D. L., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hawley, Amos (1986) Human Ecology: A Theoretical Essay. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huang, Yasheng (2005) Selling China: Foreign Direct Investment During the Reform Era. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Koppel, Nathan, & Batson, Andrew (2007) “A U.S. Law Firm Takes a New Route Into China,” The Wall Street Journal, 30 Jan., p. B1.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, & Molnár, Virág (2002) “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences,” 28 Annual Rev. of Sociology 167–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Magali S. (1977) The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Aijun (2007) “Foreign Law Firms Push Forward, Mainland and Hong Kong Cooperate to Balance,” Fazhi Ribao [Legal Daily], 22 Jan., p. 3.Google Scholar
Liu, Sida (2006) “Client Influence and the Contingency of Professionalism: The Work of Elite Corporate Lawyers in China,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 751–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, Lynn, et al. 2001 Divorce Lawyers at Work: Varieties of Professionalism in Practice. Oxford, United Kingdom, and New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Merry Sally, E. (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., & Rowan, Brian (1977) “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myths and Ceremony,” 83 American J. of Sociology 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan (2003) “Unhooking from the State: Chinese Lawyers in Transition,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Prieur, Mia (2006) “The Shot Heard ‘Round the World: A Brewing Revolution Against Foreign Law Firms in China?,” China Legal Watch, 15 June. Hong Kong: CCH Hong Kong Limited.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Felstiner, William L. F. (1995) Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Shanghai Lawyers Association (2006) Shanghai Lawyers Association News Brief, Issue 9, 17 April.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. (1981) “Making Sense of the Lower Courts,” 6 The Justice System J. 13–27.Google Scholar
Silver, Carole (2002) “The Case of the Foreign Lawyer: Internationalizing the U.S. Legal Profession,” 25 Fordham International Law J. 1039–84.Google Scholar
Silver, Carole (2007) “Local Matters: Internationalizing Strategies for U.S. Law Firms,” 14 Indiana J. of Global Legal Studies 67–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. (2001) A General Jurisprudence of Law and Society. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Statutes Cited

Administrative Regulation on the Representative Offices of Foreign Law Firms. 22 Dec. State Council, (2001).Google Scholar
Interim Regulation on the Establishment of Foreign Law Offices in China. 26 May. State Administration of Industry and Commerce, and Ministry of Justice (1992).Google Scholar
Joint Notice on Forbidding Foreign Lawyers to Practice in China. Ministry of Justice, State Bureau of Foreign Experts, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Beijing (1981).Google Scholar
Regulation on the Implementation of the Administrative Regulation on the Representative Offices of Foreign Law Firms. Ministry of Justice, Beijing (4 July 2002).Google Scholar