Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T22:26:46.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Issues of Legal Policy in Social Science Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Extract

The call for studies of the social impact of particular judicial, legislative, administrative and executive rules, decisions and practices is sounded sporadically and acted upon but rarely. To read the recent decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States overruling established precedents in many areas of our constitutional law is to catalogue a long list of missed opportunities for social scientists. As an example of the cause for this lament, I shall present Keyishian v. Board of Regents which for all practical purposes overruled Adler v. Board of Education.

Type
Department
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 by the Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967).

2. Adler v. Board of Education, 342 U.S. 485 (1952).

3. 342 U.S., at 497.

4. 342 U.S., at 508, 509.

5. 342 U.S., at 509.

6. Id.

7. Id.

8. Id.

9. 342 U.S., at 509, 510.

10. 342 U.S., at 501, 502.

11. 342 U.S., at 501.

12. 342 U.S., at 500.

13. 342 U.S., at 498.

14. 342 U.S., at 505.

15. 385 U.S., at 601.

16. 385 U.S., at 601, 603.

17. 385 U.S., at 607.

18. The studies cited are P. F. Lazarsfeld & W. Thielens, The Academic Mind 92-112, 192-217 (1958); F. B. Biddle, The Fear of Freedom 155 et seq. (1951) ; M. Jahoda & S. Cook, Security Measures and Freedom of Thought: An Expiatory Study of the Impact of Loyalty and Security Programs, 61 Yale L.J. 295 (1952); R. M. MacIver, Academic Freedom in Our Time (1955); M. R. Konvitz, Expanding Liberties 86-108 (1966); C. Morris, “Academic Freedom and Loyalty Oaths” 28 Law & Contemp. Prob. 487 (1963).