Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:02:50.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judging Police Misconduct: “Street-Level” versus Professional Policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

In their interactions with citizens, police officers are prohibited from (1) using unnecessary Force, (2) Abusing their authority, (3) speaking Discourteously, or (4) using Offensive language, all captured by the acronym FADO. However, acts of police misconduct are complex social phenomena that involve both following legal guidelines and responding to extralegal or mitigating circumstances. Using a factorial survey of police-civilian interactions that introduce various dimensions of FADO and surrounding circumstances, respondents are asked to rate from zero to ten the seriousness of police misconduct in an encounter. Findings show that respondents' judgments of the seriousness of misconduct consider both legal and extralegal dimensions. On the legal side of the ledger, officers' unnecessary use of force and use of offensive language significantly increase judgments of serious misconduct; on the extralegal side of the ledger, civilians' confrontational demeanor significantly reduces judgments of serious misconduct. The findings suggest that citizens expect officers to behave professionally, or by the book, but with a recognition that “street-level” discretion has a place in an officer's toolkit. Citizens' expectations that street-level discretion has its place is also demonstrated by findings for the dimension abuse of authority: Abuse or threatening behavior by officers is not a significant predictor of serious police misconduct. In addition, characteristics of the respondents explain propensities to observe different degrees of police misconduct. Controlling for the social status, political orientation, and prior experience of respondents with the police, we find that (1) blacks rate police misconduct significantly higher than their white counterparts, and (2) liberals rate police misconduct significantly higher than their conservative counterparts. Differences in judgments by blacks and whites and by liberals and conservatives concerning judgments of police misconduct have important implications for the legitimacy of police authority.

Type
Articles of General Interest
Copyright
© 2004 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, K. (1999b) “A Research Agenda on Police Use of Force,” in Maxwell, C. D. et al., eds., Use of Force by the Police: Overview of National and Local Data. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, 6178.Google Scholar
Alpert, Geoffrey P., & Dunham, R. G. (1988) Policing Multi-Ethnic Neighborhoods: The Miami Study and Findings for Law Enforcement in the United States. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Alpert, Geoffrey P., & Smith, W. C. (1994) “How Reasonable Is the Reasonable Man? Police and Excessive Force,” 85 J. of Criminal Law & Criminology 481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, K. M., & Gross, S. R. (2000) “Highway Stops: Drug Interdiction and Racial Profiling.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Bittner, Egon (1970) The Functions of the Police in Modern Society: A Review of Background Factors, Current Practices, and Possible Role Models. Chevy Chase, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, Center for Studies of Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar
Black, D. (1980) The Manners and Customs of the Police. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Black, D., & Reiss, A. J. Jr. (1967) Patterns of Behavior in Police and Citizen Transactions. Washington, DC: President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice.Google Scholar
Cao, Liquin, & Huang, Bu (2000) “Determinants of Citizen Complaints against Police Abuse of Power,” 28 J. of Criminal Justice 203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Civilian Complaint Review Board (1993) “Civilian Complaint Review Board Appoint Public,” in Int 0549-1992-A.Google Scholar
Clear, Todd R., & Rose, Dina R. (1999) When Neighbors Go to Jail: Impact on Attitudes About Formal and Informal Social Control. Washington, DC: Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Conyers Pushes Bill to Gather Info on ‘Driving While Black’ Traffic Stops,” (1999) Jet, 4–5.Google Scholar
Davis, J. R. (1990) “A Comparison of Attitudes toward the New York City Police,” 17 J. of Police Science and Administration 233–43.Google Scholar
Decker, S. H. (1981) “Citizen Attitudes toward the Police: A Review of Past Findings and Suggestions for Future Policy,” 9 J. of Police Science and Administration 80–7.Google Scholar
Dumanovsky, T. (2000) “Subject to Debate? Social Science Research and NYPD Street Stops.” Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Law & Society Association, Miami.Google Scholar
Fagan, Jeffrey, & Davies, Garth (2000) “Street Cops and Broken Windows: Terry, Race and Disorder in New York City,” 28 Fordham Urban Law J. 457504.Google Scholar
Feagin, J. R. (1991) “The Continuing Significance of Race: AntiBlack Discrimination in Public Places,” 56 American Sociological Rev. 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, T. J., & Vaughn, M. S. (1996) “Public Opinion About Police Abuse of Force,” in Geller, W. A. & Tochs, H., eds., Police Violence. New Haven and London: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Foner, Nancy (1987) New Immigrants in New York. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, Poll (1999) The Gallup Poll. March 5–7, 1999. The Polling Report, Inc. http://www.pollingreport.com/index.html.Google Scholar
Gamson, W. A., & McEvoy, J. (1972) “Police Violence and Its Public Support,” in Short, J. F. & Wolfgang, M. E., eds., Collective Violence. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Geller, W. A. (1983) “Police Misconduct: Scope of the Problem and Remedies,” 23 American Bar Foundation Research Reporter 16.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jeffrey (1999) The Color of Suspicion: Racial Profiling,” The New York Times Magazine, 20 June 1999:51.Google Scholar
Greenfield, Lawrence A., Langan, Patrick A., Smith, Steven K., & Kaminski, Robert (1997) Police Use of Force: Collection of National Data. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Hader, I., & Snortum, J. R. (1975) “The Eye of the Beholder: Differential Perceptions of Police by the Police and the Public,” 2 Criminal Justice and Behavior 3754.Google Scholar
Hagan, J., & Albonetti, C. (1982) “Race, Class and the Perception of Criminal Injustice in America,” 88 American J. of Sociology 329–55. DOI: 10.1086/227674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Poll (1999) The Harris Poll. March 19–23, 1999. The Polling Report Inc. http://www.pollingreport.com/index.html.Google Scholar
Henriquez, Mark A. (1999) “IACP National Database Project on Police Use of Force,” in C. D. Maxwell et al., eds., Use of Force by Police: Overview of National and Local Data. Research report jointly published with the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Holmes, Steven T., Reynolds, K.Michael, Holmes, Ronald M., & Faulkner, Samuel (1999) “Individual and Situational Determinants of Police Force: An Examination of Threat Presentation,” 23 American J. of Criminal Justice 83106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., Farkas, S., Bers, A., Connolly, C., & Maldonado, Z. (1999) “Americans' Views on Crime and Law Enforcement: A Look at Recent Survey Findings,” in Measuring What Matters: Proceedings from the Policy Research Institute Meetings. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Kerstetter, W. A. (1996) “Toward Justice for All: Procedural Justice and the Review of Citizen Complaints,” in Geller, W. A. & Toch, H., eds., Police Violence. New Haven and London: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Klinger, David (1994) “Demeanor or Crime? Why ‘Hostile’ Citizens Are More Likely to Be Arrested,” 32 Criminology 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, David (1996) “More on Demeanor and Arrest in Dade County,” 34 Criminology 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, David (1997) “Negotiating Order in Patrol Work: An Ecological Theory of Police Response to Deviance,” 35 Criminology 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klockars, C. B. (1996) “A Theory of Excessive Force and Its Control,” in Geller, W. A. & Toch, H., eds., Police Violence. New Haven and London: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lambert, Bruce (2000) “40 Percent in New York Born Abroad,” The New York Times, 24 July 2000: A1.Google Scholar
Langan, Patrick A., Greenfield, Lawrence A., Smith, Steven K., Durose, Matthew R., & Levin, David J. (2001) Contacts between the Police and the Public: Findings from the 1999 National Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (1980) Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Mastrofski, Stephen D., Reisig, Michael D., & McCluskey, John D. (2002) “Police Disrespect toward the Public: An Encounter-Based Analysis,” 40 Criminology 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, Stephen D., Snipes, J. B., & Parks, R. B. (2000) “The Helping Hand of the Law: Police Control of Citizens on Request,” 38 Criminology 307–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, Stephen D., Snipes, J., & Supina, A. (1996) “Compliance on Demand: The Public's Response to Specific Police Requests,” 33 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 269305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mastrofski, Stephen D., Worden, R. E., & Snipes, J. B. (1995) “Law Enforcement in a Time of Community Policing,” 33 Criminology 539–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, M. Townsend, & Tobier, A. (1997) Immigration Is Transforming New York. New York: Taub Urban Research Center, New York University.Google Scholar
Muir, William K. (1977) Police: Street Corner Politicians. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
National Opinion Research Center (1998) General Social Survey. University of Chicago. http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/GSS.Google Scholar
National Opinion Research Center (2000) General Social Survey. University of Chicago. http://webapp.icpsr.umich.edu/GSS.Google Scholar
Office of the Attorney General of New York (1999) The New York City Police Department's “Stop and Frisk” Practices. New York: Office of the Attorney General.Google Scholar
Office of the Inspector General (2003) The September 11 Detainees: A Review of the Treatment of Aliens Held on Immigration Charges in Connection with the Investigation of the September 11 Attacks. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Office of the Inspector General of the United States.Google Scholar
Pastore, Ann L., & Maguire, Kathleen, eds. (2001) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice. http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook.Google Scholar
Reiss, Albert J. (1968) “Police Brutality: Answers to Key Questions,” 5 Trans-action 1019.Google Scholar
Reiss, Albert J. (1971) The Police and the Public. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Riksheim, Eric C., & Chermak, Steven M. (1993) “Causes of Police Behavior Revisited,” 21 J. of Criminal Justice 353–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., & Anderson, Andy B. (1982) “The Factorial Survey Approach: An Introduction,” in Rossi, P. H. & Nock, S., eds., Measuring Social Judgments. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Rossi, Peter H., & Berk, R. A. (1997) Just Punishments: Federal Guidelines and Public Views Compared. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sampson, Robert. J., & Bartusch, Dawn. J. (1999) Attitudes toward Crime, Police and the Law: Individual and Neighborhood Differences. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Douglas (2002) The Quinnipiac University Poll: February 7, 2002. Quinnipiac University. http://www.quinnipiac.edu.Google Scholar
Seron, C., Frankel, M., Muzzio, D., Pereira, J., & Van Ryzin, G. (1997) “A Report on the Perceptions and Experiences of Lawyers, Judges and Court Employees Concerning Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness in the Federal Courts of the Second Circuit of the United States,” 1 & 2 New York University Annual Survey of American Law 415–97.Google Scholar
Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (1997) “Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn't, What's Promising.” Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.Google Scholar
Skogan, W. G. (1994) Contacts between Police and Public: Findings from the 1992 British Crime Survey. London: HMSO Books.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H. (1975) Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome H., & Fyfe, James J. (1993) Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Son, I. S., Tsang, C., & Davis, M. S. (1997) “Citizen's Observations of Police Use of Excessive Force and Their Evaluation of Police Performance,” 20 Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategy and Management 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunshine, Jason, & Tyler, T. R. (2003) “The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrill, William (2001) Police Coercion: Application of the Force Continuum. New York: LFB Publishing.Google Scholar
Terrill, William, & Mastrofski, Stephen D. (2002) “Situational and Officer-Based Determinants of Police Coercion,” 19 Justice Q. 216–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thacher, David (2001) “Conflicting Values in Community Policing,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 765–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. (1992) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Boeckmann, R. J. (1997) “Three Strikes and You Are Out, but Why? The Psychology of Public Support for Punishing Rule Breakers,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 237–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Degoey, P. (1995) “Collective Restraint in Social Dilemmas: Procedural Justice and Social Identification Effects on Support for Authorities,” 69 J. of Personality and Social Psychology 482–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., & Huo, Yuen J (2002) Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel (1995) Citizen Review Resource Manual. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel, & Wright, Betsy (1995) Citizen Review of the Police 1994: A National Survey. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum Publication.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald (2000) “Racialized Policing: Resident's Perceptions in Three Neighborhoods,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald (2002) “Incidents of Police Misconduct and Public Opinion,” 30 J. of Criminal Justice 397–08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald, & Tuch, S. A. (1999) “Race, Class and Perceptions of Discrimination by the Police,” 45 Crime & Delinquency 494507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, William Julius (1980) The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, William Julius (1987) The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, Marvin E. (1985) The National Survey of Crime Severity. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Worden, R. E., & Shepard, R. L. (1996) “Demeanor, Crime and Police Behavior: A Reexamination of the Police Services Study Data,” 34 Criminology 83105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortley, S., Macmillan, R., & Hagan, J. (1997) “Just Des(S)Erts? The Racial Polarization of Perceptions of Criminal Injustice,” 31 Law & Society Rev. 637–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar