Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:53:58.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law, Democracy, and Domination: Law and Society Research as Critical Scholarship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Robert L. Nelson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is an instructive irony that Frank Munger delivered his Presidential Address in Miami Beach. As someone who was there on Memorial Day weekend of 2000, I can report that at the time of the address there was more than the usual contrast between setting and substance. Munger issued his call for connecting law and society research to the real world of struggle and politics in the cool, windowless expanse of a plush convention-hotel ballroom. The response of the audience was polite, if not inspired. In sharp contrast, immediately outside the hotel, the hot and humid streets of South Beach buzzed and blared with a Hip Hop convention that had drawn masses of young people from around the country. This was an audience that really was turned on to the message of its leaders.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , 2001 , pp. 33 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

References

References

Grossman, Joel B., Kritzer, Herbert M. & Macaulay, Stewart (1999) “Do the Haves Still Come Out Ahead?” 33 Law & Society Rev. 803–10.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Nelson, Robert L., Laumann, Edward O. & Michelson, Ethan (1998) “The Changing Character of Lawyers' Work: Chicago in 1975 and 1995,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 751–75.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank (2001) “Inquiry and Activism in Law and Society” (herein).Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., & Bridges, William P. (1999) Legalizing Gender Inequality: Courts, Markets, and Unequal Pay for Women in America. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sandefur, Rebecca L., & Laumann, Edward O. (1997) “Changing Patterns of Income Stratification in the Chicago Bar.” Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Law & Society Association, St. Louis Missouri, May 29, 1997.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Justice (2001) Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2000. Bureau of Justice Statistics. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/pjim00.htm.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta, cert. granted, Mar. 26, 2001, 00–730, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2689.Google Scholar
Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).Google Scholar
Alexander v. Sandoval, No. 99–1908, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3367, decided April 24, 2001.Google Scholar
Bd. of Trustees, Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, No. 99–1240, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 1700, 69 U.S.L.W. 4105 (2001), decided February 21, 2001.Google Scholar
Bush v. Gore, No. 00–949, 2000 U.S. LEXIS 8430, 69 U.S.L.W. 4029, decided Dec. 12, 2000.Google Scholar
Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, No. 99–1379, 2001 U.S. LEXIS 2459, 69 U.S.L.W. 3628, decided Mar. 21, 2001.Google Scholar
City of Richmond v.J.A. Croson, 488 U.S. 469 (1989).Google Scholar
Hopwood v. Texas, 236 F. 3d 256 (5th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
Wygant v. Jackson Bd. of Education, 476 U.S. 267 (1986).Google Scholar