Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T15:37:32.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

John P. Heinz ,
Anthony Paik  and
Ann Southworth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars have devoted attention to “cause lawyers” on the political left, but lawyers who work on the conservative side of the American political spectrum have received relatively little academic consideration. This article presents systematic data on the characteristics of and relationships among lawyers affiliated with organizations active on a selected set of 17 conservative issues. We find that the lawyers serve several separate and distinct constituencies—business conservatives, Christian conservatives, libertarians, abortion opponents—and that the credentials of the lawyers serving these varying constituencies differ significantly. The greatest degree of social separation occurs between the business constituency and the abortion opponents, with another clear separation between libertarians and the interest groups devoted to traditional family values and order maintenance. The divisions among these constituencies appear to reflect the difference between “insider politics” and “populism,” which is manifested in part in actual geographic separation between lawyers located in the District of Columbia and those in the South, West, and Midwest. In the center of the network, however, we find some potential “mediators”—prominent lawyers who may facilitate communication and coordination among the several constituencies. These lawyers and the organizations they serve attempt to merge morality, market freedom, and individual liberty concerns, and they convene meetings of diverse sets of lawyers and organizational leaders to seek consensus on policy goals. Nonetheless, the findings indicate that most organizations are seldom active on issues that lie beyond the relatively narrow boundaries of their own interests.

Type
Papers of General Interest
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 5 - 50
Copyright
© 2003 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Our thanks to Steven Calabresi, George Dent, Richard Epstein, Marc Galanter, Peter Gerhart, Thomas Merrill, Andrew Morriss, Laura Beth Nielsen, Daniel Polsby, Carole Silver, Albert Yoon, and David Van Zandt, who commented on earlier drafts, to Marcia Lehr, Helen Raye King, and Julie Liu, who provided invaluable research assistance, and to Catherine Zaccarine, who created the figures.

References

American Center for Law and Justice (n.d.) “About the A.C.L.J.,” http://www.aclj.org/about/aboutm.asp.Google Scholar
American Enterprise Institute (n.d.) “About the American Enterprise Institute,” http://www.aei.org/aboutaei.htm.Google Scholar
Americans United for Life (2000) “About AUL” http://www.unitedforlife.org/aboutaul.html.Google Scholar
Aron, Nan (1989) Liberty and Justice for All: Public Interest Law in the 1980s and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bisharat, George (1996) “Right Lawyers for the Right Time: The Rise of the Pacific Legal Foundation.” Presented at the Law and Society Annual Meeting. Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney (1986) The Rise of the Counter-Establishment: From Conservative Ideology to Political Power. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Breiger, Ronald L. (1974) “The Duality of Persons and Groups,” 53 Social Forces 181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, William P. (1990) “Organized Interests and Their Issue Niches: A Search for Pluralism in a Policy Domain,” 52 J. of Politics 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cato Institute (2000) “About Us,” http://www.cato.org/about.html.Google Scholar
Center for Individual Rights (2000) “Mission Statement,” http://www.cir-usa.org/mission_new.html.Google Scholar
Chicago Tribune (2002) “Vote Blocks House Bill on Bankruptcies,” November 15, p. 15, col. 1.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Martha F. (1993) Brutal Need: Lawyers and the Welfare Rights Movement 1960–73. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Den Dulk, Kevin R. (2001) “Prophets in Caesar's Courts: The Role of Ideas in Catholic and Evangelical Rights Advocacy.” Doctoral dissertation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Derge, David (1959) “The Lawyers as Decision-Maker in the American State Legislature,” 21 J. of Politics 408–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derge, David (1962) “The Lawyer in the Indiana General Assembly,” 6 Midwest J. of Political Science 19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Bryant, Garth (1999) From Notables of the Foreign Policy Establishment to the International Market of Professionals of Philanthropy and Human Rights: Strategies for Power and the Social Construction of a New Field of State Expertise, American Bar Foundation Working Paper Series Paper #9818. Chicago, IL: ABF.Google Scholar
Eagle Forum (n.d.) “Mission,” http://www.eagleforum.org/misc.descript.html.Google Scholar
Edsall, Thomas B. (2001) “Federalist Society Becomes a Force in Washington: Conservative Group's Members Take Key Roles in Bush White House and Help Shape Policy and Judicial Appointments,” Washington Post, 18 April, A4.Google Scholar
Empower America (n.d.) “About Empower America,” http://www.empoweramerica.org/eaAbout/about.jsp.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee (1985) Conservatives in Court. Knoxville, TN: Univ. Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Ethics and Public Policy Center (2001) “About Us,” http://www.eppc.org/about/xg/ASP/gx/about.html.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, & Sprague, John (1964) Lawyers in Politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Family Research Council (2000) “Mission Statement,” http://www.frc.org/aboutfrc.cfm.Google Scholar
Federalist Society (2002) “Our Purpose,” http://www.fed-soc.org/ourpurpose.htm.Google Scholar
Feld, Scott L. (1981) “The Focused Organization of Social Ties,” 86 Am. J. of Sociology 1015–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focus on the Family (n.d.) “Mission Statement,” http://www.family.org/welcome/aboutfof/a0005554.html.Google Scholar
Foundation Center (2000) Foundation Grants Index. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jo (1975) The Politics of Women's Liberation. New York: McKay.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, & Palay, Thomas (1991) Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark (1985) “Economic Action, Social Structure, and Embeddedness,” 91 J. of Sociology 481–510.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Jack (1994) Crusaders in the Courts. New York: BasicBooks.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel, et al. (1978) Lawyers and the Pursuit of Legal Rights. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hatcher, Laura J. (2001) “Libertarian Lawyers: Translating Ideology Into Social Activism.” Presented at Law and Society Association Annual Meeting. Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., Nelson, Robert L., & Salisbury, Robert H. (1993) The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Himmelstein, Jerome L. (1990) To the Right: The Transformation of American Conservatism. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Godfrey (1996) The World Turned Right Side Up: A History of the Conservative Ascendancy in America. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, Marie (1997) “Interest Groups' Decisions to Join Alliances or Work Alone,” 41 American J. of Political Science 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsky, Charles A. (1952) The Washington Lawyer. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Hosticka, Carl J. (1979) “We Don't Care What Happened, We Only Care About What Is Going to Happen: Lawyer-Client Negotiations of Reality,” 26 Social Problems 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houck, Oliver A. (1984) “With Charity for All,” 93 Yale L. J 1415–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, Albert R. (1997) “Politics and People: Daschle Charts Common Ground on Abortion,” Wall Street Journal, 22 May, A15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute for Justice (2001) “Profile,” http://www.ij.org/profile/index.html.Google Scholar
Katz, Jack (1982) Poor People's Lawyers in Transition. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Michael J. (1994) The Lives of Lawyers: Journeys in the Organizations of Practice. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kluger, Richard (1976) Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Knopf, Inc.Google Scholar
Knoke, David (1994) “Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making,” in Wasserman, S., & Galaskiewicz, J., eds. Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Kruskal, Joseph B., & Wish, Myron (1978) Multidimensional Scaling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labor Policy Association (2001) “About LPA,” http://www.lpa.org/lpapublic/insideLSP/AboutLPA_index.htm.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold D. (1960) Psychopathology and Politics. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., Marsden, Peter V., & Prensky, David (1983) “The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis,” in Burt, R., & Minor, M., eds. Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lewin, Tamar (2001) “3 Conservative Foundations Are in the Throes of Change,” New York Times, 3 June, A20.Google Scholar
Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory (2000) http://www.martindale.com/locator/home.html.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1998) “The Causes of Cause Lawyering: Toward an Understanding of the Motivation and Commitment of Social Justice Lawyers,” in Sarat, A., & Scheingold, S., eds. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, & Meadow, Robert (1983) “Resource Allocation in Legal Services: Individual Attorney Decisions in Work Priorities,” 5 Law & Policy Q. 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (1956) The Power Elite. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Neal (1986) “Dilemmas of Legal Mobilization: Ideologies and Strategies of Mental Patient Liberation Groups,” 8 Law & Policy Q. 105–29.Google ScholarPubMed
Mnookin, Robert (1985) In the Interests of Children: Advocacy, Law Reform, and Public Policy. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. (1988) Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley CA: Univ. of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., & Heinz, John P. (1988) “Lawyers and the Structure of Influence in Washington,” 22 Law & Society Review 237–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth, & Albiston, Catherine R. (2001) “Cause Lawyering in the 21st Century: Four Preliminary Case Studies of the New Public Interest Law Firm Model.” Presented at Law and Society Annual Meeting. Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen (1978) Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
O'Connor, Karen, & Epstein, Lee (1983) “The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation,” 45 J. of Politics 479–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Susan M. (1984) Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro, & Sensenbrenner, Julia (1993) “Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action,” 98 American J. of Sociology 1320–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricci, David M. (1993) The Transformation of American Politics: The New Washington and the Rise of Think Tanks. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H. (1969) “An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups,” 13 Midwest J. of Political Science 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., & Conklin, Lauretta (1998) “Instrumental Versus Expressive Group Politics: The National Endowment for the Arts,” in Cigler, A., & Loomis, B., eds. Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., Heinz, John P., Laumann, Edward O., & Nelson, Robert L. (1987) “Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition,” 81 American Political Science Rev. 1217–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin (1998) “Between (the Presence of) Violence and (the Possibility of) Justice: Lawyering Against Capital Punishment,” in Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S., eds. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, & Scheingold, Stuart (1998) Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (2001) Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sard, Barbara (1988) “The Role of the Courts in Welfare Reform,” 22 Clearinghouse Rev. 367–88.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay L., & Tierney, John T. (1985) Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Shenon, Philip (2002) “Bankruptcy Legislation May Be Stalled: Abortion Provision Seen as Stumbling Block,” New York Times, 30 July, C1.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Helena (1996) Unleashing Rights: Law, Meaning, and the Animal Rights Movement. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, James A. (1991) The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann (1996) “Lawyer-Client Decisionmaking in Civil Rights and Poverty Practice: An Empirical Study of Lawyers' Norms,” 9 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 1–55.Google Scholar
Spangler, Eve (1986) Lawyers for Hire: Salaried Professionals at Work. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stefancic, Jean, & Delgado, Richard (1996) No Mercy: How Conservative Think Tanks and Foundations Changed America's Social Agenda. Philadelphia, PA: Temple Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sturm, Susan P. (1993) “The Legacy and Future of Corrections Litigation,” 142 Univ. of Penn. Law Rev. 639–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass (1988) “Beyond the Republican Revival,” 97 Yale Law J. 1539–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass (1993) The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Toner, Robin (2001) “Conservatives Savor Their Role as Insiders at the White House,” New York Times, 20 March, A1.Google Scholar
Trubek, Louise, & Kransberger, Elizabeth (1998) “Critical Lawyers: Social Justice and the Structures of Private Practice,” in Sarat, A. & Scheingold, S., eds. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (1987) The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925–1950. Chapel Hill, NC: Univ. of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. News & World Report (2000) “Top Law Schools,” http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/beyond/gradrank/law/gdlaw1.htm.Google Scholar
Wagner, Bridgett G., Hilboldt, John E., & Korsvall, Eric T. (2000) Policy Experts 2000: A Guide to Public Policy Experts and Organizations. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Walker, Jack L. (1983) “The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups In America,” 77 American Political Science Rev. 390–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L. (1995) Race Relations Litigation in an Age of Complexity. Charlottesville, VA: Univ. Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Who's Who in American Law (2000) Chicago, IL: Marquis Who's Who.Google Scholar