Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T19:17:10.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Legal Malaise; or, Justice Observed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Marc Galanter
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the twenty years since the founding of the Law and Society Association, a distinctive “law and society” discourse has emerged and been institutionalized in a multidisciplinary scholarly community, which has been instrumental in producing a tremendous increase in systematic knowledge about the law in action. The growth of law and society research has accompanied other changes in the distribution of information about the legal process, including a new legal journalism and greater media coverage that make the law in action more visible to a wider audience. Current distress of legal elites about the hypertrophy of legal institutions is viewed as a reaction to the increased currency of information that discredits the received picture of the legal world. The coincidence of structural changes in law with changes in the social institutions of knowledge about law creates the possibility of a more responsive and inquiring legal process.

Type
Presidential Address
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , 1985 , pp. 537 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This is a revised version of my presidential address, delivered at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, Hotel Marriott Copley Place, Boston, June 8, 1984. I am grateful to Willard Hurst, Stewart Macaulay, Austin Sarat, John Henry Schlegel, and Susan Silbey, whose helpful and diverse responses to an intermediate version made me aware of how partial and personal is the view expressed here. I want to thank Marc Landauer for his capable assistance.

References

ABEL, Richard L. (1973a) “A Comparative Theory of Dispute Institutions in Society,” 8 Law & Society Review 217.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (1973b) “Law Books and Books about Law,” 26 Stanford Law Review 175.Google Scholar
ABEL, Richard L. (ed.) (1982) The Politics of Informal Justice, 2 vols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION (1972) The 1971 Lawyer Statistical Report, ed. Sikes, B.H., Carson, C.N. and Gorai, P.. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold S. (1976) Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
AUERBACH, Jerold S. (1983) Justice Without Law? Resolving Disputes Without Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
BLACK, Donald (1984) “Jurocracy in America,” 6 The Tocqueville Review 273.Google Scholar
BOK, Derek C. (1983) “A Flawed System,” 85(5) Harvard Magazine 38.Google Scholar
BURG, Elliot M. (1977) “Law and Development: A Review of the Literature & a Critique of ‘Scholars in Self-Estrangement’,” 25 American Journal of Comparative Law 492.Google Scholar
BURGER, Warren E. (1982) “Isn't There a Better Way?” 68 American Bar Association Journal 274.Google Scholar
BURGER, Warren E. (1984) “Annual Message on the Administration of Justice … at the Midyear Meeting, American Bar Association, Feb. 12.”.Google Scholar
BURGER, Warren E. (1985) “Remarks … at the American Law Institute,” Mayflower Hotel, Washington, DC, Tuesday, May 14.Google Scholar
CANNON, Mark (1983) “Contentious and Burdensome Litigation: A Need for Alternatives,” 63 National Forum 10 (Fall).Google Scholar
CARLIN, Jerome E., Jan, HOWARD and Sheldon L., MESSINGER (1966) “Civil Justice and the Poor: Issues for Sociological Research,” 1 Law & Society Review 9.Google Scholar
CARTWRIGHT, Bliss, Marc, GALANTER and Robert, KIDDER (eds.) (1974-75) Litigation and Dispute Processing. Special Issues of the Law & Society Review, Vol. 9, Nos. 1, 2.Google Scholar
CHURCH, Thomas W. Jr., CARLSON, Alan, LEE, Jo-Lynne and Teresa, TAN (1978) Justice Delayed: The Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
COHEN, Stanley (1983) “Social Control Talk: Telling Stories about Correctional Change,” in Garland, D. and Young, P. (eds.), The Power to Punish. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
COVER, Robert M. (1983) “Foreword: Nomos and Narrative,” 97 Harvard Law Review 4.Google Scholar
CROZIER, Michael (1984) The Trouble with America. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FEELEY, Malcolm (1976) “The Concept of Laws in Social Science: A Critique and Notes on an Expanded View,” 10 Law & Society Review 497.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William L.F., ABEL, Richard L. and Austin, SARAT (1980-81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming and Claiming,” 15 Law & Society Review 631.Google Scholar
FitzGERALD, Jeffrey (1983) “Patterns of ‘Middle Range’ Disputing in Australia and the United States,” 1 Law in Context 15.Google Scholar
FRANK, Jerome (1963) Courts on Trial: Myth and Reality in American Justice. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence M. and Robert V., PERCIVAL (1976) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1977) Excerpt from an unpublished paper entitled “Notes on the Future of Social Research on Law,” in Friedman, L. and Macaulay, S. (eds.), Law and the Behavioral Sciences, 2d ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S. (1981) “Justice in Many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering and Indigenous Law,” 19 Journal of Legal Pluralism 1.Google Scholar
Macaulay, S. (1983a) “Mega-Law and Mega-Lawyering in the Contemporary United States,” in Dingwall, R. and Lewis, P. (eds.), The Sociology of the Professions. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. (1983b) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 UCLA Law Review 4.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. (1984) “The Emergence of the Judge as a Mediator in Civil Cases.” Working Paper 1984-5, Disputes Processing Research Program, University of Wisconsin—Madison.Google Scholar
GARDNER, James A. (1980) Legal Imperialism: American Lawyers and Foreign Aid in Latin America. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
GARVEY, Gerald (1971) Constitutional Bricolage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
GOLDMAN, Sheldon and Austin, SARAT (eds.) (1978) American Court Systems: Readings in Judicial Process and Behavior. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
GORDON, Robert W. (1974) Review of Gilmore, The Death of Contract, 1974 Wisconsin Law Review 1216.Google Scholar
GORDON, Robert W. (1981) “Historicism in Legal Scholarship,” 90 Yale Law Journal 1017.Google Scholar
GORDON, Robert W. (1975-76) Essays in Honor of J. Willard Hurst. Special Issues of the Law & Society Review, Vol. 10, Nos. 1 and 2.Google Scholar
GROSSMAN, Joel B. and David M., TRUBEK (eds.) (1980-81) Dispute Processing and Civil Litigation. Special Issue of Law & Society Review, Vol. 15, Nos. 3–4.Google Scholar
GURVICH, Georges (1947) Sociology of Law. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John (1974) “Extra-legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological Viewpoint,” 8 Law & Society Review 357.Google Scholar
HANDLER, Joel (1978) Social Movements and the Legal System: A Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine B. (1982) “Delegalization Reform Movements: A Historical Analysis,” in Abel, R. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HOFFMAN, Paul (1982) Lions of the Eighties: The Inside Story of the Powerhouse Law Firms. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
HOWARD, A.E. Dick (1981) “A Litigation Society?” 5(3) Wilson Quarterly 98.Google Scholar
HURST, James Willard (1950) The Growth of American Law: The Law Makers. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
JACOB, Herbert (1969) Debtors in Court: The Consumption of Government Services. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Earl Jr. (1974) Justice and Reform: The Formative Years of the OEO Legal Services Program. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL (1984) Special Issue on Alternative Dispute Resolution, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Summer).Google Scholar
KATZ, Elihu (1981) “Publicity and Pluralistic Ignorance: Notes on The Spiral of Silence',” in Baier, H., Kepplinger, H.M. and Reumann, K. (eds.), Offentliche Meinung und sozialer Wandel. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
KESTER, John G. (1984) “Are Lawyers Becoming Public Enemy Number One?” 21(2) Court Review 4.Google Scholar
KLECK, Gary (1981) “Racial Discrimination in Criminal Sentencing: A Critical Evaluation of the Evidence with Additional Evidence on the Death Penalty,” 46 American Sociological Review 783.Google Scholar
KLINE, J. Anthony (1978) “Law Reform and the Courts: More Power to the People or to the Profession?” 53 California State Bar Journal 14.Google Scholar
LEFCOURT, Robert (ed.) (1971) Law Against the People: Essays to Demystify Law, Order and the Courts. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
LEVIN, Martin A. (1977) Urban Politics and the Criminal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1966) Law and the Balance of Power: The Automobile Manufacturers and Their Dealers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (forthcoming) “Private Government,” in Lipson, L. and Wheeler, S. (eds.), Law and the Social Sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
MATZA, David (1964) Delinquency and Drift. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
MERRYMAN, John H. (1977) “Comparative Law and Social Change: On the Origins, Style, Decline & Revival of the Law and Development Movement,” 25 American Journal of Comparative Law 457.Google Scholar
MILLER, Richard E. and Austin, SARAT (1980-81) “Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture,” 15 Law & Society Review 525.Google Scholar
MNOOKIN, Robert H. and Lewis, KORNHAUSER (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” 88 Yale Law Journal 950.Google Scholar
MORGAN, Richard E. (1984) Disabling America: The “Rights Industry” in Our Time. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
MOORE, Sally Falk (1973) “Law and Social Change: The Semi-Autonomous Social Field as an Appropriate Subject of Study,” 7 Law & Society Review 719.Google Scholar
NELSON, Robert (1981) “Practice and Privilege: Social Change and the Structure of Large Law Firms,” 1981 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 95.Google Scholar
O'CONNOR, Karen (1980) Women's Organizations' Use of the Courts. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
OLSON, Susan M. (1984) Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
POWELL, Michael J. (1985) “The New Legal Press: Reflecting and Facilitating Changes in the Legal Profession.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Law and Society Association, San Diego, June.Google Scholar
RIFKIND, Simon H. (1976) “Are We Asking Too Much of Our Courts?” 70 Federal Rules Decisions 96.Google Scholar
ROSENBERG, Maurice (1977) “Contemporary Litigation in the United States,” in Jones, H.W. (ed.), Legal Institutions Today: English and American Approaches Compared. Papers prepared for the Bicentennial Observance of the American Bar Association and presented at the annual meeting of the Association in Atlanta, Georgia, on August 5-12, 1976.Google Scholar
ROSS, H. Laurence (1970) Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustments. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
ROSTOW, Eugene V. (ed.) (1971) Is Law Dead? New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
ROTTENBERG, Dan (1979) “The Pinstripe Revolution,” 28(7) Chicago 98 (July).Google Scholar
SARAT, Austin (1985) “Legal Effectiveness and Social Studies of Law: On the Unfortunate Persistence of a Research Tradition,” 9 Legal Studies Forum 23.Google Scholar
SCHLEGEL, John Henry (1979) “American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science: From the Yale Experience,” 28 Buffalo Law Review 459.Google Scholar
SCIGLIANO, Robert G. (1962) The Courts: A Reader in the Judicial Process. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
SHUCHMAN, Philip (1979) Problems of Knowledge in Legal Scholarship. West Hartford: University of Connecticut Law School Press.Google Scholar
SILBEY, Susan S. and Egon, BITTNER (1982) “The Availability of Law,” 4 Law and Policy Quarterly 399.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome H. (1966) Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
SMIGEL, Erwin O. (1964) The Wall Street Lawyer: Professional Organization Man? New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
STEELE, Eric H. (1981) “The Historical Context of Small Claims Courts,” 1981 American Bar Foundation Research Journal 293.Google Scholar
STEVENS, Robert (1983) Law School: Legal Education in America from the 1850s to the 1980s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
TOMASIC, Roman and Malcolm M., FEELEY (eds.) (1982) Neighborhood Justice: Assessment of an Emerging Idea. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David (1984) “Turning Away from Law,” 82 Michigan Law Review 824.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David and Marc, GALANTER (1974) “Scholars in Self-Estrangement: Some Reflections on the Crisis in Law and Development Studies in the United States,” 1974 Wisconsin Law Review 1062.Google Scholar
TRUBEK, David, GROSSMAN, Joel B., FELSTINER, William L.F., KRITZER, Herbert M., and Austin, SARAT (1983) Civil Litigation Research Project. Final Report, 3 vols. in 2. Madison: Disputes Processing Research Program, University of Wisconsin Law School.Google Scholar
TWINING, William (1973) Karl Llewellyn and the Realist Movement. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Bureau of Labor Statistics (1985) Handbook of Labor Statistics, Bulletin 2217 (June). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
WARREN, Robert Penn (1946) All the King's Men. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.Google Scholar
WASBY, Stephen (1970) The Impact of the United States Supreme Court-Some Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
WEISBROD, Burton A., HANDLER, Joel F. and Neil K., KOMESAR (1978) Public Interest Law: An Economic and Institutional Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOLFF, Robert Paul (ed.) (1971) The Rule of Law. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
YANKELOVICH, Daniel (1981) New Rules: Searching for Self Fulfillment in a World Turned Upside Down. New York: Random House.Google Scholar