Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-5pczc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T05:50:16.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legality, Social Research, and the Challenge of Institutional Review Boards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Malcolm M. Feeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Presidential Address
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 757 - 776
Copyright
© 2007 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presidential Address delivered at the Annual Meeting of the Law & Society Association, Baltimore, Maryland, July 8, 2006. In preparing this piece, I have benefited enormously from conversations with a number of colleagues, including Howie Erlanger, Rosann Greenspan, Christine Harrington, Bob Kagan, Jack Katz, Felice Levine, John Mueller, Laura Stark, Brian Tamanaha, and Dvorah Yannow. Needless to say, the views expressed are my own.

References

Auerbach, Carl A. (1966) “Legal Tasks for the Sociologist,” 1 Law & Society Rev. 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Donald (1980) The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael (2005) “2004 Presidential Address: For Public Sociology,” 70 American Sociological Rev. 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, Marianne (2005) Just Silences: The Limits and Possibilities of Modern Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Driesen, David (2002) “Does Natural Law Thinking Drive Law and Economics?” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., et al. (1993) “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace,” 27 Law & Society Rev. 497–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara (2001) Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Erlanger, Howard S. (2005) “Presidential Address: Organizations, Institutions, and the Story of Shmuel: Reflections on the 40th Anniversary of the Law & Society Association,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm (2005) “Three Voices of Socio-Legal Studies,” 35 Israel Law Rev. 175–82.Google Scholar
Frankel, Marvin E. (1972) “Lawlessness in Sentencing,” 41 Univ. of Cincinnati Law Rev. 1–79.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. (1965) The Morality of Law, rev. ed. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Philip (2004) “The New Censorship: Institutional Review Boards,” 2004 Sup. Ct. Rev. 271–354.Google Scholar
Harrington, Christine (2007) “The Impact of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) on Law & Society Researchers.” Report, Membership and Professional Issues Committee, Law & Society Association, 6 July.Google Scholar
Katz, Jack (2006) “Ethical Escape Routes for Underground Ethnographers,” 33 American Ethnologist 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, John (2006) “Ignorance Is not Bliss, Nor Ethical.” Unpublished paper distributed at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Baltimore, Maryland, July 5–8, 2006.Google Scholar
Northwestern University Law Review (2007) “Symposium: Censorship and Institutional Review Boards,” 101 Northwestern University Law Rev.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin (2005) The Death Penalty: Influences and Outcomes. Aldershot, United Kingdom: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (1973) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change, 2d ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart, & Austin, Sarat (2004) Something to Believe In: Politics, Professionalism, and Cause Lawyering. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart, & Austin, Sarat (2005) Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1969) Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Skolnick, Jerome (1966) “Social Research on Legality: A Reply to Auerbach,” 1 Law & Society Rev. 105–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Laura (2006) “Morality in Science: How Research Is Evaluated in the Age of Human Subjects Research.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Sociology, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian (2006) Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1983) “Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law,” 17 Law & Society Rev. 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, Gunther (1984) “Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg,” 18 Law & Society Rev. 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubek, David (1988) “The Handmaiden's Revenge: On Reading and Using the Newer Sociology of Civil Procedure,” 51 Law and Contemporary Problems 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar