Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:25:31.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mechanisms behind Litigation's “Radiating Effects”: Historical Grievances against Japan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Celeste L. Arrington Open the ORCID record for Celeste L. Arrington [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars argue that litigation can have positive and negative “radiating” or indirect effects for social movements, irrespective of formal judicial decisions. They see litigation as a dynamic process with distinctive features yet nonetheless intertwined with advocacy in other forums. Litigation can indirectly shape collective identities, reframe debates, or provide political leverage. However, the mechanisms behind these radiating effects are poorly understood. Through an analysis of lawsuits and related activism by Korean survivors of Japanese actions in the first half of the twentieth century, this article disaggregates the mechanisms behind litigation's productive indirect effects. It theorizes and illustrates mechanisms such as attribution of similarity, brokerage, issue dramatization, political cover, and intergroup discussions. These mechanisms help us understand how litigants obtain litigation's indirect effects and thus also the broader impact of postwar compensation lawsuits in East Asia, despite few judicial victories. The article contributes non-Western and transnational cases to scholarship on litigation's indirect effects.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 6 - 40
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Logan Strother, Jennifer Dixon, Sheila Smith, the editors, and anonymous reviewers for their feedback. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Council on Foreign Relations, the James Joo-Jin Kim Program in Korean Studies at the University of Pennsylvania, and the annual meeting of the Association of Asian Studies. Thanks for superb research assistance from Miho Moon and Leslie Kim. This research would not have been possible without the generosity and honesty of the plaintiffs, lawyers, journalists, activists, and scholars with whom I spoke in Japan and Korea. I am also grateful for the fellowship year at the Program in Law and Public Affairs at Princeton University in 2017–18 and research support from the George Washington University Institute for Korean Studies.

References

References

Albiston, Catherine (1999) “The Rule of Law and the Litigation Process: The Paradox of Losing by Winning,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 869–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albiston, Catherine (2011) “The Dark Side of Litigation as a Social Movement Strategy,” 96 Iowa Law Rev. 61.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle (2010) “Anonymous: On Silence and the Public Sphere,” in Sarat, Austin, ed., Speech and Silence in American Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 106–33.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann (2006) Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Arakawa, Maki (2001) “A New Forum for Comfort Women: Fighting Japan in United States Federal Court,” 16 Berkeley Women's Law J. 174.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. (2014) “Leprosy, Legal Mobilization, and the Public Sphere in Japan and South Korea,” 48 Law & Society Rev. 563–93.Google Scholar
Arrington, Celeste L. (2019) “Hiding in Plain Sight: Pseudonymity and Participation in Legal Mobilization,” 52 Comparative Political Studies. 310–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avenell, Simon (2012) “From Fearsome Pollution to Fukushima: Environmental Activism and the Nuclear Blind Spot in Contemporary Japan,” 17 Environmental History 244–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Elazar (2000) The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Barkan, Steven E. (1984) “Legal Control of the Southern Civil Rights Movement,” 49 American Sociological Rev. 552–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Jeb (2009) “U.S. District Courts, Litigation, and the Policy-Making Process,” in Miller, Mark C., ed., Exploring Judicial Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. 97–109.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jeb (2011) Dust-Up: Asbestos Litigation and the Failure of Commonsense Policy Reform. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance (1990) “Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States,” 40 J. of Communication 103–27.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas U. (2012) War, Guilt, and World Politics after World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Anne & Miller, Paul Steven (2011) “Blindsight: How We See Disabilities in Tort Litigation,” 86 Washington Law Rev. 709–53.Google Scholar
Boling, David (1994) “Mass Rape, Enforced Prostitution, and the Japanese Imperial Army: Japan Eschews International Legal Responsibility,” 32 Columbia J. of Transnational Law 533–90.Google Scholar
Brooks, Roy L., ed. (1999) When Sorry Isn't Enough: The Controversy over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Chinkin, Christine M. (2001) “Women's International Tribunal on Japanese Military Sexual Slavery,” 95 The American J. of International Law 335–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choe, Sang-Hun (2017) “Deal With Japan on Former Sex Slaves Failed Victims, South Korean Panel Says.” The New York Times, December 27, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/27/world/asia/comfort-women-south-korea-japan.html.Google Scholar
Choi, Kyung-ho (2013) “Octogenarian Recalls Days of Forced Labor in Japan.” JoongAng Daily, January 8, 2013. http://mengnews.joins.com/view.aspx?aId=2965111.Google Scholar
Chosun Ilbo (1990) “Sakhalin Dongpo Yeongju Gwiguk Baesang Cheonggu [Sakhalin Compatriots Request Repatriation and Compensation],” June 5, 1990.Google Scholar
Chun, Ja-hyun & Kim, Youcheer (2014) “A New Interpretation of Korea-Japan Relations: ‘Rights Revolution’ of Sex Slaves and Forced Laborers in the Courtroom,” 12 Korean J. of International Studies 255–76.Google Scholar
Chung, Joo-won, and Im, Mi-na (2016) “S. Korean Victim Vents Her Fury at Japan's Wartime Sex Slavery.” Yonhap, August 14, 2016. http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2016/08/13/24/0301000000AEN20160813004800315F.html.Google Scholar
Collier, David (2011) “Understanding Process Tracing,” 44 PS: Political Science & Politics 823–30.Google Scholar
Coomaraswamy, Radhika (1996) “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, Its Causes and Consequences.” UN Commission on Human Rights E/CN.4/1996/53/Add.1. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G96/101/23/PDF/G9610123.pdf?OpenElement.Google Scholar
Cummings, Scott & NeJaime, Douglas (2009) “Lawyering for Marriage Equality Symposium: Sexuality & Gender Law: Assessing the Field, Envisioning the Future,” 57 UCLA Law Rev. 1235–332.Google Scholar
Davis, Jeffrey (2008) Justice across Borders: The Struggle for Human Rights in U.S. Courts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, John & Reicher, Steve (2009) “Collective Psychological Empowerment as a Model of Social Change: Researching Crowds and Power,” 65 J. of Social Issues 707–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (1998) “A Plea for Mechansisms,” in Hedström, Peter & Swedberg, Richard, eds., Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, David M. & McCann, Michael W., eds. (2009) Fault Lines: Tort Law as Cultural Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David M. & Munger, Frank W. (2002) Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Engel, Stephen M. (2013) “Frame Spillover: Media Framing and Public Opinion of a Multifaceted LGBT Rights Agenda,” 38 Law & Social Inquiry 403–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (1998) The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. & Lynch, Julia F. (2009) “Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis,” 42 Comparative Political Studies 1143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm M. (1973) “Power, Impact, and the Supreme Court,” in Becker, Theodore L. & Feeley, Malcolm M., eds., The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions: Empirical Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Abel (1981) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, and Claiming,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–54.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul (2003) “Acting when Elected Officials Won't: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U.S. Labor Unions 1935–85,” 97 American Political Science Rev. 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Rev. 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1983) “The Radiating Effects of Courts,” in Boyum, Keith O. & Mather, Lynn, eds., Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longman. 117–42.Google Scholar
Gao, William (2006) “Overdue Redress: Surveying and Explaining the Shifting Japanese Jurisprudence on Victims' Compensation Claims,” 45 Columbia J. of Transnational Law 529.Google Scholar
Gash, Alison L. (2015) Below the Radar: How Silence Can Save Civil Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gitlin, Todd (1980) The Whole World Is Watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Jon B. & Barclay, Scott (2012) “Mind the Gap: The Place of Gap Studies in Sociolegal Scholarship,” 8 Annual Rev. of Law and Social Science 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark (1973) “The Strength of Weak Ties,” 78 American J. of Sociology 1360–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, John O. (1978) “The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant,” 4 J. of Japanese Studies 359–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. & Deardorff, Alan V. (2006) “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy,” 100 The American Political Science Rev. 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, Jodi & Weinstein, Harvey M. (2004) “Rehumanizing the Other: Empathy and Reconciliation,” 26 Human Rights Q. 561–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, San (2017) “Gwangju Byeonhohoe Geunrojeongsindae Sosong Ilbon Byeonhodan e Gamsapae [Gwangju Bar Association Establishes Memorial for the Japanese Lawyers in the Forced Labor Corps Lawsuits].” News1, December 7, 2017. http://news1.kr/articles/?3173472.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (1978) Social Movements and the Legal System: Theory of Law Reform and Social Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
He, Yinan (2009) The Search for Reconciliation: Sino-Japanese and German-Polish Relations since World War II. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewstone, Miles, Rubin, Mark, & Willis, Hazel (2002) “Intergroup Bias,” 53 Annual Rev. of Psychology 575–604.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hippin, Andreas (2005) “The End of Silence: Korea's A-Bomb Victims Seek Redress,” 3 The Asia-Pacific J.Google Scholar
Holzmeyer, Cheryl (2009) “Human Rights in an Era of Neoliberal Globalization: The Alien Tort Claims Act and Grassroots Mobilization in Doe v. Unocal,” 43 Law & Society Rev. 271–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Keum-bi (2017) “First Citizens' Tribunal Coming from Vietnam War Victims of South Korean Soldiers.” Hankyeoreh, June 25, 2017.Google Scholar
Johnston, Eric (2017) “U.S. Supreme Court Refuses to Review Challenge to California ‘Comfort Women’ Statue.” The Japan Times Online, March 28, 2017.Google Scholar
Jung, Dae-ha (2017) “[Interview] Gaining Justice for the Young Korean Women Forced to Work in Japanese Factories Is His Destiny.” Hankyeoreh, August 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. (2009) “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights,” 43 Law & Society Rev. 151–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelman, Mark (1987) A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kidder, Robert L. & Miyazawa, Setsuo (1993) “Long-Term Strategies in Japanese Environmental Litigation,” 18 Law & Social Inquiry 605–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Hyung-Jin (2019) “S.K. Freezes Japan Company Assets Over Forced Labor Spat.” The Washington Post. January 9, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/s-korea-freezes-japan-company-assets-over-forced-labor-spat/2019/01/08/b34fe540-13b5-11e9-ab79-30cd4f7926f2_story.html?utm_term=.229f6d4d62af.Google Scholar
Kim, Ji Young & Sohn, Jeyong (2017) “Settlement without Consensus: International Pressure, Domestic Backlash, and the Comfort Women Issue in Japan,” 90 Pacific Affairs 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Min-kyung (2017) “13 Years of Cooperative Struggle by S. Korean and Japanese Lawyers.” Hankyeoreh, January 29, 2017.Google Scholar
Kim, Taejin (2014) “Views on Compensation for Conscripted Korean Laborers from Japanese Companies: A Recent Korean Supreme Court Case,” 13 Asian Business Lawyer 15–34.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. (2004) From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz & Merry, Sally Engle (2016) The New Legal Realism: Volume 2: Studying Law Globally. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, Han-sol (2018) “Court Dismisses Comfort Women's Suit against Government for Signing 2015 Agreement with Japan.” Hankyeoreh, June 17, 2018.Google Scholar
Koga, Yukiko (2013) “Accounting for Silence: Inheritance, Debt, and the Moral Economy of Legal Redress in China and Japan,” 40 American Ethnologist 494–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koga, Yukiko (2016) “Between the Law: The Unmaking of Empire and Law's Imperial Amnesia,” 41 Law & Social Inquiry 402–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ku, Yangmo (2015) “National Interest or Transnational Alliances? Japanese Policy on the Comfort Women Issue,” 15 J. of East Asian Studies 243–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, Jun-Hyeok & Nobles, Melissa, eds. (2013) Inherited Responsibility and Historical Reconciliation in East Asia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyodo, (2004) “State Loses Fifth Suit over Snub of Hibakusha Illness Claims,” October 15, 2004.Google Scholar
Kyodo, . 2017) “Forced Laborers' Right to Compensation from Japan Stands: Moon,” August 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Lee, Seokwoo (2014) “The Views of Korean International Law Schoalrs Regarding the 2012 Supreme Court Decisions on Compensation for Forced Labor and Translations of the Decisions,” 2 Korean J. of International and Comparative Law 193–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Mark A. (2008) “Nishimatsu Construction Co. v. Song Jixiao et al; Kō Hanako et al. v. Japan,” 102 The American J. of International Law 148–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, Jennifer (2008) Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lovell, George I. (2003) Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James (2001) “Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method,” in Hedström, Peter, Swedberg, Richard, & Ragin, Charles C., eds., Sociological Forum, Vol. 16. 575–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainichi, (2008) “Hibakusha: A Korean's Fight to End Discrimination toward Foreign A-Bomb Victims,” May 9, 2008.Google Scholar
Mainichi, . 2015) “Hibakusha: Breaking down a Wall of Discrimination to Help Korean A-Bomb Survivors,” November 16, 2015.Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna-Maria (2006) “Social Movement Strategies and the Participatory Potential of Litigation,” in Sarat, Austin & Scheingold, Stuart A., eds., Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 164–81.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn (1998) “Theorizing about Trial Courts: Lawyers, Policymaking, and Tobacco Litigation,” 23 Law & Social Inquiry 897–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, McCarthy, John D., & Zald, Meyer N. (1996) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, & Tilly, Charles, eds. (2001) Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, & Tilly, Charles, eds. (2008) “Methods for Measuring Mechanisms of Contention,” 31 Qualitative Sociology 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael (1992) “Review: Reform Litigation on Trial,” 17 Law and Social Inquiry 715–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael (1994) Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael (1996) “Causal Versus Constitutive Explanations (or, on the Difficulty of Being So Positive...),” 21 Law & Social Inquiry 457–82.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1998) “How Does Law Matter for Social Movements?” In Does, How Law Matter?, edited by Garth, Bryant and Sarat, Austin, 76–108. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael & Silverstein, Helena (1998) “Rethinking Law's ‘Allurements’: A Relational Analysis of Social Movement Lawyers in the United States,” in Sarat, Austin & Scheingold, Stuart A., eds., Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McDougall, Gay J. (1998) “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Systematic Rape, Sexual Slavery, and Slavery-like Practices.” UN Document E/CN.4/Sub.2/1998/13. UN Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f44114.html.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (2006) “New Legal Realism and the Ethnography of Transnational Law,” 31 Law & Social Inquiry 975–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Neal (1987) “The Right to Refuse Treatment: Four Case Studies of Legal Mobilization,” 21 Law & Society Rev. 447–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minow, Martha (1990) Making all the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Murai, Shusuke (2016) “Tokyo Court Rules against Conservative Group Suing Asahi over ‘comfort Women’ Articles.” Japan Times, July 29, 2016.Google Scholar
Naoi, Megumi & Krauss, Ellis S. (2009) “Who Lobbies Whom? Special Interest Politics under Alternative Electoral Systems,” 53 American J. of Political Science 874–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NeJaime, Douglas (2011) “Winning through Losing,” 96 Iowa Law Rev. 941–1012.Google Scholar
Neumann, Klaus & Thompson, Janna, eds. (2015) Historical Justice and Memory. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Susan M. (1984) Clients and Lawyers: Securing the Rights of Disabled Persons. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Osaki, Tomohiro (2015) “Supreme Court Rules Hibakusha Overseas Are Entitled to Full Medical Expenses.” Japan Times, September 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor (2009) “Collective Action Theory,” in Boix, Carles & Stokes, Susan C., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paluck, Elizabeth Levy & Green, Donald P. (2009) “Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice,” 60 Annual Rev. of Psychology 339–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paolini, Stefania, Hewstone, Miles, Cairns, Ed, & Voci, Alberto (2004) “Effects of Direct and Indirect Cross-Group Friendships on Judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The Mediating Role of an Anxiety-Reduction Mechanism,” 30 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 770–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, Soon-Won (2006) “The Politics of Remembrance: The Case of Korean Forced Laborers in the Second World War,” in Shin, Gi-Wook, Park, Soon-Won, & Yang, Daqing, eds., Rethinking Injustice and Reconciliation in Northeast Asia. London, UK: Routledge. 55–74.Google Scholar
Passy, Florence (2001) “Socializing, Connecting, and the Structural Agency/Gap: A Specification of the Impact of Networks on Participation in Social Movements,” 6 Mobilization 173–92.Google Scholar
Passy, Florence (2003) “Social Networks Matter. But How?” in Diani, Mario & McAdam, Doug, eds., Social Movements and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press. 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, Nicola (2001) “Transnational Women's Activism in Japan and Korea: The Unresolved Issue of Military Sexual Slavery,” 1 Global Networks 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Richard S. & Keck, Thomas M. (2015) “Movement Litigation and Unilateral Disarmament: Abortion and the Right to Die,” 40 Law & Social Inquiry 880–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Motoko (2017) “Japan Envoy, Recalled Over ‘Comfort Woman’ Statue, Is Returning to Seoul.” The New York Times, April 3, 2017.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (2008) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Second Edition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1960) The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America, 1st ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. (2004) The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Social Change, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Gi-Wook, Park, Soon-Won, & Yang, Daqing, eds. (2007) Rethinking Historical Injustice and Reconciliation in Northeast Asia: The Korean Experience. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Ji-eun (2005) “Han Il Hyeopjeong Munseo Gonggae [Disclosure of the Korea-Japan Negotiation Documents].” Chosun Ilbo, January 18, 2005.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon (2009) Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Erica S. & Smith, Nicholas Rush (2017) “Comparison with an Ethnographic Sensibility,” 50 PS: Political Science & Politics 126–30.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, & Bosco, David (2000) “Plaintiff's Diplomacy.” 79 Foreign Affairs, 102–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, David A. & Benford, Robert D. (1988) “Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization,” in Klandermans, Bert, Kriesi, Hanspeter, & Tarrow, Sidney G., eds., From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures, Vol. 1. International Social Movement Research. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Soh, Chunghee Sarah (2008) The Comfort Women: Sexual Violence and Postcolonial Memory in Korea and Japan. Worlds of Desire. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staggenborg, Suzanne (1988) “The Consequences of Professionalization and Formalization in the Pro-Choice Movement,” 53 American Sociological Rev. 585–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Patricia G. (1999) “Doing the Defendant's Laundry: Support Groups as Social Movement Organizations in Contemporary Japan,” 11 Japanstudien: Jahrbuch Des Deutschen Instituts Für Japanstudien 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinhoff, Patricia G., ed. (2014) Going to Court to Change Japan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Japanese Studies.Google Scholar
van Stekelenburg, Jacquelien & Klandermans, Bert (2013) “The Social Psychology of Protest,” 61 Current Sociology 886–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strother, Logan (2017) “How Expected Political and Legal Impact Drive Media Coverage of Supreme Court Cases.” 34 Political Communication 571–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stürmer, Stefan, Simon, Bernd, Loewy, Michael, & Jörger, Heike (2003) “The Dual-Pathway Model of Social Movement Participation: The Case of the Fat Acceptance Movement,” 66 Social Psychology Q. 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suh, Jae-Jung (2010) “Truth and Reconciliation in South Korea,” 42 Critical Asian Studies 503–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney & McAdam, Doug (2005) “Scale Shift in Transnational Contention,” in Porta, Donatella Della & Tarrow, Sidney, eds., Transnational Protest and Global Activism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 121–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Japan Times (2016) “U.N. Chief Meets with Comfort Woman; Rights Chief Calls Japan-South Korea Deal ‘Insufficient,’” March 12, 2016.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2001) “Mechanisms in Political Processes,” 4 Annual Rev. of Political Science 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torpey, John C. (2015) “The Political Field of Reparations,” in Neumann, Klaus & Thompson, Janna, eds., Historical Justice and Memory. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. 63–73.Google Scholar
Totsuka, Etsuro (1999) “Commentary on a Victory for Comfort Women: Japan's Judicial Recognition of Military Sexual Slavery,” 8 Pacific Rim Law & Policy J. 47.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru (2009) “The Trajectory of Perpetrators' Trauma: Mnemonic Politics around the Asia-Pacific War in Japan,” 87 Social Forces 1389–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, William (2006) “Names, Bones, and Unpaid Wages (1): Reparations for Korean Forced Labor in Japan.” The Asia-Pacific Journal, September. http://www.japanfocus.org/-William-Underwood/2219.Google Scholar
Upham, Frank K. (1987) Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa (2012) “Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK,” 46 Law & Society Rev. 523–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdeja, Ernesto (2009) Unchopping a Tree: Reconciliation in the Aftermath of Political Violence. Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Andrew & Wolejszo, Stefan (2006) “Collecting on Moral Debts: Reparations for the Holocaust and Pořajmos,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 871–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, K. (1989) “Law and Society Studies in Korea: Beyond the Hahm Theses,” 23 Law & Society Rev. 891–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Whan-woo (2017) “No Candidate Respects ‘comfort Women’ Deal with Japan.” Korea Times, April 5, 2017.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Korean Constitutional Court, 2006HeonMa788, ruling on Aug. 30, 2011.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Korea, 2009Da22549 and 2009Da68620, both rulings on May 24, 2012.Google Scholar
Korean Supreme Court, 2013da61381, ruling on Oct. 30, 2018; and 2013da67587, ruling on Nov. 29, 2018.Google Scholar
Korean Constitutional Court, 2009HeonBa317, ruling on Dec. 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Supreme Court of Japan, Heisei 14 (ne) no. 511 (on forced labor), dismissed on April 27, 2007a.Google Scholar
Heisei 16 (ju) no. 1658 (on forced labor) ruling on April 27, 2007.Google Scholar
Heisei 17 (ju) no. 1735 (on comfort women) ruling on April 27, 2007.Google Scholar
Heisei 17 (o) no. 985 (on comfort women), dismissed on April 27, 2007.Google Scholar
Hwang Geum Joo vs. Japan, U.S. District Court of Appeals, No. 01-7169, ruling on June 28, 2005.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Act on Assistance to Victims of Forced Overseas Mobilization at the Time of the Pacific War (Ilje Gangjeomha Gangjedongwon Pihaeja Jiwon Beopryul) (law no. 8669, Dec. 10, 2007), Korea.Google Scholar
Special Law on Verification and Support for Victims of Forced Mobilization under Japanese Colonialism (Ilje Gangjeomha Gangjedongwon Pihae Jinsang Gyumyeong deungegwanhan Teukbyeolbeop) (law no. 7174, March 5, 2004), Korea.Google Scholar
Hansen's Disease Compensation Law (Hansenbyō Ryōyōjo Nyūshoshani taisuru Hoshōkin no Shigo nado ni kansuru Hōritsu) (law no. 63, June 22, 2001, revised Feb. 3, 2006).Google Scholar