Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T16:01:48.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceived Risk and Social Control: Do Sanctions Really Deter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Raymond Paternoster ,
Linda E. Saltzman ,
Gordon P. Waldo  and
Theodore G. Chiricos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perceptual deterrence researchers have used simple cross-sectional correlations between prior behavior and current perceptions to study the effect of legal threats on social control. Such designs are inadequate because they: (1) confuse the causal ordering of perceptions and behavior, and (2) fail to take into account other inhibitory factors in an explicit causal model. In an analysis of panel data, the methodological simplicity of earlier studies is shown to have led researchers to reach erroneous conclusions. Our data suggest that past studies report an experiential effect, not a deterrent effect, and that the effect of perceived sanctions on criminal involvement is minimal once social definitional factors (moral commitment, informal sanctions) are controlled.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , 1983 , pp. 457 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 The Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to thank Richard Lempert, Colin Loftin, and the anonymous referees of the Law & Society Review for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

AKERS, Ronald L. (1977) Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 2nd Ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
AKERS, Ronald L., KROHN, Marvin D., LANZA-KADUCE, Lonn and Marcia, RADOSEVICH (1979) “Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory,” 44 American Sociological Review 636.Google Scholar
ANDERSON, Linda S., CHIRICOS, Theodore G. and Gordon P., WALDO (1977) “Formal and Informal Sanctions: A Comparison of Deterrent Effects,” 25 Social Problems 103.Google Scholar
BAILEY, William C. and Ruth P., LOTT (1976) “Crime, Punishment and Personality: An Examination of the Deterrence Question,” 67 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 99.Google Scholar
BECKER, Howard S. (1960) “Notes on the Concept of Commitment,” 66 American Journal of Sociology 32.Google Scholar
BECKER, Howard S. (1963) Outsiders. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
BURKETT, Steven R. and Eric L., JENSEN (1975) “Conventional Ties, Peer Influence, and the Fear of Apprehension: A Study of Adolescent Marijuana Use,” 16 Sociological Quarterly 522.Google Scholar
DUNCAN, Beverly and Otis D., DUNCAN (1978) Sex Typing and Social Roles. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
EMPEY, LaMar T. (1982) American Delinquency, Rev. Ed. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
FESTINGER, Leon A. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GIBBS, Jack P. (1975) Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
GRASMICK, Harold G. and George J., BRYJAK (1980) “The Deterrent Effect of Perceived Severity of Punishment,” 59 Social Forces 471.Google Scholar
GREENBERG, David F. (1981) “Methodological Issues in Survey Research on the Inhibition of Crime,” 72 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1094.Google Scholar
HANUSHEK, Eric A. and John E., JACKSON (1977) Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
HARRIS, Anthony R. (1977) “Sex and Theories of Deviance: Toward a Functional Theory of Deviant Type-Scripts,” 42 American Sociological Review 3.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, Michael J. (1971) “Age, Sex and the Versatility of Delinquent Involvements,” 18 Social Problems 522.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, Michael J. (1973) “Causes of Delinquency: A Partial Replication and Extension,” 20 Social Problems 471.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, Michael J. (1981) “Variations in Sex-Race-Age-Speciflc Incidence Rates of Offending,” 46 American Sociological Review 461.Google Scholar
HINDELANG, Michael J., Travis, HIRSCHI and Joseph G., WEIS (1981) Measuring Delinquency. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
HIRSCHI, Travis (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
JENSEN, Gary F., ERICKSON, Maynard L. and Jack P., GIBBS (1978) “Perceived Risk of Punishment and Self-Reported Delinquency,” 57 Social Forces 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KIM, Jae-On and Charles W., MUELLER (1978) Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KTTSUSE, John I. (1962) “Societal Reactions to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and Method,” 9 Social Problems 247.Google Scholar
KORNHAUSER, Ruth R. (1978) Social Sources of Delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KRAUT, Robert E. (1976) “Deterrent and Definitional Influences on Shoplifting,” 23 Social Problems 358.Google Scholar
KROHN, Marvin D. and James L., MASSEY (1980) “Social Control and Delinquent Behavior: An Examination of the Elements of the Social Bond,” 21 Sociological Quarterly 529.Google Scholar
LEWIS, M. (1972) “Parents and Children: Sex-Role Development,” 80 School Review 229.Google Scholar
MEIER, Robert F. and Weldon T., JOHNSON (1977) “Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity,” 42 American Sociological Review 292.Google Scholar
MINOR, W. William (1977) “A Deterrence-Control Theory of Crime,” in Meier, R. (ed.), Theory in Criminology: Contemporary Views. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
MINOR, William W. and Joseph, HARRY (1982) “Deterrent and Experiential Effects in Perceptual Deterrence Research: A Replication and Extension,” 19 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 190.Google Scholar
NIE, Norman H., HULL, C. Hadlai, JENKINS, Jean G., STEINBRENNER, Karin and Dale H., BENT (1975) SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
PATERNOSTER, Raymond, SALTZMAN, Linda E., CHIRICOS, Theodore G. and Gordon P., WALDO (1982) “Perceived Risk and Deterrence: Methodological Artifacts in Perceptual Deterrence Research,” 73 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 1238.Google Scholar
SALTZMAN, Linda E., PATERNOSTER, Raymond, WALDO, Gordon P. and Theodore G., CHIRICOS (1982) “Deterrent and Experiential Effects: The Problem of Causal Order in Perceptual Deterrence Research,” 19 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 172.Google Scholar
SCHUR, Edwin M. (1971) Labeling Deviant Behavior. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
SILBERMAN, Matthew (1976) “Toward a Theory of Criminal Deterrence,” 41 American Sociological Review 442.Google Scholar
SUTHERLAND, Edwin and Donald R., CRESSEY (1978) Criminology, 10th Ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
TEEVAN, James J. (1976) “Subjective Perception of Deterrence (continued),” ____13 Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 155.Google Scholar
TITTLE, Charles R. (1977) “Sanction, Fear and the Maintenance of Social Order,” 55 Social Forces 579.Google Scholar
WALDO, Gordon P. and Theodore G., CHIRICOS (1972) “Perceived Penal Sanction and Self-Reported Criminality: A Neglected Approach to Deterrence Research,” 19 Social Problems 522.Google Scholar
WIATROWSKI, Michael D., GRISWOLD, David B. and Mary K., ROBERTS (1981) “Social Control Theory and Delinquency,” 46 American Sociological Review 525.Google Scholar