Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T20:42:17.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Primetime Dispute Resolution: Reality TV Mediation Shows in China's “Harmonious Society”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Colin S. Hawes  and
Shuyu Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Through a case study of reality TV mediation shows, this article joins the debate about the recent promotion of formal and informal mediation by the Chinese government, what some scholars have called a “turn against law” (Minzner 2011). We identify three converging reasons for the sudden popularity of mediation shows on Chinese primetime television: (1) the desire of TV producers to commercially exploit interpersonal conflicts without fanning the flames of social instability; (2) the demands of official censors for TV programming promoting a “harmonious society”; and (3) the requirement for courts and other government institutions to publicly demonstrate their support for mediation as the most “appropriate” method for resolving interpersonal and neighborhood disputes. Cases drawn from two top-rated mediation shows demonstrate how they privilege morality and “human feeling” (ganqing) over narrow application of the law. Such shows could be viewed merely as a form of propaganda, what Nader has called a “harmony ideology”—an attempt by the government to suppress the legitimate expression of social conflict. Yet while recognizing that further political, social, and legal reforms are necessary to address the root causes of social conflict in China, we conclude that TV mediation shows can help to educate viewers about the benefits and drawbacks of mediation for resolving certain narrow kinds of domestic and neighborhood disputes.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 47 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 739 - 770
Copyright
© 2013 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard L. (1982) The Politics of Informal Justice (vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bai, Wanqing (2009) Xin laoniangjiu tiaojie shouji: huajie yi chang mingjiao qinqing de zhanzheng (Diary of A New Family Mediator: Declaring War in the Name of Family Feeling). Shanghai: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
Bai, Wanqing (2010a) “Hutu xiongdi hutu chou,” (Mixed up brothers get into a crazy fight), Shanghai Fazhibao August 20.Google Scholar
Bai, Wanqing (2010b) “Wo dui laoniangjiu jiemu de tihui,” (My experience of the show New Family Mediator), Bai Wanqing's blog, August 31. Available at: http://www.oldkids.cn/blog/blog_con.php?blogid=139363 (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Bai, Wanqing (2010c) “Yi chang fangchan jiufen de liangxin zhan” (A Battle of Conscience Caused by a Real Estate Dispute), Xinmin Evening News October 19.Google Scholar
Bai, Wanqing (2010d) “Bai Wanqing shouji: fangchan re de huo” (Bai Wanqing's Diary: A Firestorm Stirred up by Real Estate), Jiancha fengyun 2010/22.Google Scholar
Baidu (2012) “Shanghai Dongfang dianshitai,” (Shanghai Dragon TV), Baidu Baike. Available at: http://baike.baidu.com/view/134044.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Dongfang zaobao (2009) “Guangdianju Yanguan Qingganlei Dianshi Jiemu: Xinling Huayuan Tingbo,” (SARFT regulates TV shows on human feelings, “Soul Garden” is Suspended), Dongfang zaobao Jan. 3. Available at: http://news.hexun.com/2009-01-03/113022806.html (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Feng, Bo (2011) “Tiaojielei jiemu shoushi zhidao jiexi,” (Analysis of viewing trends for mediation shows), Shoushi zhongguo 2011/7.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen (1984) “Against Settlement,” 93 Yale Law J. 1073–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Hualing (2010) “Access to Justice in China: Potentials, Limits, and Alternatives,” in Gillespie, J., & Chen, A., eds., Legal Reforms in China and Vietnam: A Comparison of Asian Communist Regimes. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing, & Cullen, Richard (2007) “From Mediatory to Adjudicatory Justice: The Limits of Civil Justice Reform in China,” SSRN Working Paper. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1306800 (accessed 25 March 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hand, Keith (2011) “Resolving Constitutional Disputes in Contemporary China,” 7 U. Penn. East Asia Law Rev. 51–159.Google Scholar
Hawes, Colin (2006) “Improving the Quality of the Judiciary in China: Recent Reforms to the Procedures for Appointing, Promoting, and Discharging Judges,” in Malleson, K., & Russell, P. H., eds., Appointing Judges in An Age of Judicial Power: Critical Perspectives from around the World. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hu, Jieren (2011) “Grand Mediation in China: Mechanism and Application,” 51 Asian Survey 1065–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Philip C.C. (2010) Chinese Civil Justice, Past and Present. Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jiancha fengyun (2010) “Editorial to Bai's Mediation Notes,” Jiancha fengyun 2010/22.Google Scholar
Jin, Wei (2011) “Cong laoniangjiu dao laoniangjiu gongzuoshi,” (From mediator to mediator's studio), Shanghai fazhibao June 28.Google Scholar
Kinkley, Jeffrey (2000) Chinese Justice, The Fiction: Law and Literature in Modern China. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohm, Steven A. (2006) “The People's Law vs. Judge Judy Justice: Two Models of Law in American Reality-Based Courtroom TV,” 40 Law & Society Rev. 693–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, Jun (2010) “Mediation Draft Law Could Ease Tension,” People's Daily Online June 23. Available at: http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90776/90785/7035843.html (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Liebman, Benjamin L. (2011) “Changing Media, Changing Courts,” in Shirk, S. L., ed., Changing Media, Changing China. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley B. (1999) Bird in a Cage: Legal Reform in China after Mao. Stanford, Calif: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (1995) “Whose Dispute Is It Anyway? A Philosophical and Democratic Defense of Settlement (In Some Cases),” 83 Georgetown Law J. 2663–96.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2001) Mediation: Theory, Policy and Practice. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2002) “When Litigation Is Not the Only Way: Consensus Building and Mediation as Public Interest Lawyering,” 10 Washington Univ. J. of Law & Policy 37–61.Google Scholar
Miao, Di (2011) “Between Propaganda and Commercials: Chinese Television Today,” in Shirk, S. L., ed., Changing Media, Changing China. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. (2006) “Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions,” 42 Stanford J. of International Law 103–80.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. (2011) “China's Turn Against Law,” 59 The American J. of Comparative Law 935–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura (1990) Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in A Zapotec Mountain Village. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura (1993) “Controlling Processes in the Practice of Law: Hierarchy and Pacification in the Movement to Re-Form Dispute Ideology,” 9 Ohio State J. on Dispute Resolution 1–25.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Kevin J., & Li, Lianjiang (2006) Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall P. (2002) China's Long March toward Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall P., & He, Xin (2008) “Dispute Resolution in China: Patterns, Causes and Prognosis,” LaTrobe University School of Law, Working Paper Series 2008/9. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1265116 (accessed 25 March 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peoples Daily (2005) “Building Harmonious Society Important Task for CPC: President Hu,” Peoples Daily English edition 20 February. Available at: http://english.people.com.cn/200502/20/eng20050220_174036.html (accessed 21 March 2013).Google Scholar
Read, Benjamin, & Michelson, Ethan (2008) “Mediating the Mediation Debate: Conflict Resolution and the Local State in China,” 52 J. of Conflict Resolution 737–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
State Administration for Radio, Film and Television (SARFT) (2011) “Guanyu jinyibu jiaqiang dianshi shangxing zonghe pindao jiemu guanli de yijian,” issued October 25.Google Scholar
Sun, Honglin (2010) “Qinqing mianqian liyi rangdao,” (In the face of family feelings, profit yields ground), Shanghai Fazhibao August 20.Google Scholar
Sun, Liping (2011) “Shehui shixu zui hexin de shi quanli shikong,” (Runaway power is the root of social disorder), Jinyang wang. Available at: http://sp.ycwb.com/2011-09/06/content_3555777.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Sun, Wanning, & Guo, Yingjie, eds. (2012) Unequal China: The Political Economy and Cultural Politics of Inequality. London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Supreme People's Court [SPC] (2004) “Zuigao Renmin Fayuan guanyu renmin fayuan minshi tiaojie gongzuo ruogan wenti de guiding,” [SPC provisions on several issues relating to the civil mediation work of the people's courts], Baidu Baike. Available at: http://baike.baidu.com/view/438810.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Supreme People's Court [SPC] (2007) “Zuigao Renmin Fayuan guanyu jin yi bu fahui susong tiaojie zai goujian shehui zhuyi hexie shehui zhong jiji zuoyong de ruogan yijian,” [Several opinions of the SPC on further promoting the positive role of mediation in lawsuits in the building of a socialist harmonious society], China Baikewang. Available at: http://www.chinabaike.com/law/zy/sf/fy/1338426.html (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Supreme People's Court [SPC] (2010) “Zuigao Renmin Fayuan guanyu jin yibu guanche tiaojie youxian, tiaopan jiehe gongzuo yuanze de ruogan yijian,” [Several Opinions of the SPC on further implementing the working principle of “giving priority to mediation and combining mediation with adjudication”], Zuigao renmin fayuan wang. Available at: http://www.court.gov.cn/qwfb/sfwj/yj/201008/t20100811_8489.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Supreme People's Court [SPC] (2012) “2011 nian quanguo fayuan shenli gelei anjian qingkuang,” (National adjudication rates for all categories of cases in 2011), Zuigao renmin fayuan wang. Available at: http://www.court.gov.cn/qwfb/sfsj/201206/t20120628_177547.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Supreme People's Court [SPC] (2013) “Zuigao Renmin Fayuan gongzuo baogao,” (SPC work report), Zhongguo wang. Available at: http://www.china.com.cn/news/2013lianghui/2013-03/10/content_28191634.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Wilson, Joshua C., & Ackerman, Erin (2012) “ ‘Tort Tales’ and TV Judges: Amplifying, Modifying, or Countering the Antitort Narrative?” 46 Law & Society Rev. 105–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, Yuning (2013) “People's Mediation in China,” in Cao, L., Sun, I., & Hebenton, B., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Criminology. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Xinhua (2010) “Chinese Legislature Passes People's Mediation Law,” Xinhuanet, August 29. Available at: http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-08/29/c_13467472.htm (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar
Xinhua (2011) Report on the Development of Chinese Broadcasting, Films and Television in 2010 (2010 nian zhongguo guangbo dianying dianshi fazhan baogao). Beijing: Xinhua chubanshe.Google Scholar
Xiong, Yihan (2006) “Renmin tiaojie de shehuihua yu zai zuzhi: dui Shanghaishi Yang Boshou gongzuoshi de ge'an fenxi,” (The socialization and reorganization of people's mediation: A case analysis of Yang Boshou's studio in Shanghai municipality), 26 Shehui 95–116.Google Scholar
Zhu, Jiuwen (2011) “Pinglun: fahui meiti liliang nengfou tuidong hexie shehui?” (Analysis: Can we use the power of the media to promote a harmonious society?), Jiangxi Weishi. Available at: http://www.cjxtv.com/pages/jptj/2011/12/9/29810.shtml (accessed 25 March 2013).Google Scholar