Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T20:30:21.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Procedural convergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Brian A. Pappas
Brian A. Pappas*
Affiliation:
Political Science Department, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA
*
Brian A. Pappas, Eastern Michigan University, 103 Boone Hall, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA., Email: bpappas1@emich.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Universities face a dilemma in determining how to create fair, consistent, and reliable processes that respect the rights of both alleged perpetrators and victims and encourage people to bring complaints forward. Using the literature on non-law forms of ordering and neo-institutional theory, this article examines university Ombuds and Title IX Coordinators and their handling of sexual misconduct disputes. Primary data collection included a review of 1200 documents and interviews with 14 Ombuds and 13 Title IX Coordinators from 22 large institutions of higher education between 2011 and 2014. This study concludes that Ombuds and Title IX Coordinators, despite being designed in sharply contrasting ways, converge (but not fully) toward a hybrid of formality and informality. This paper examines Title IX to understand what drives convergence behavior and to analyze how the recent changes in the law may alter the process of convergence. As Title IX law continues to develop, the theory of procedural convergence has important implications for the creation of non-law dispute mechanisms and the balance between individual rights and the organizational development of legal norms.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 2021 , pp. 381 - 404
Copyright
© 2021 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

How to cite this article: Pappas, Brian A. 2021. “Procedural convergence.” Law & Society Review 55(3): 381-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12560

References

REFERENCES

Association for Title IX Administrators. 2013. “ATIXA Campus Title IX Coordinator and Administrator Training and Certification Course Materials.” Accessed March 23, 2020. https://www.atixa.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Title-IX-Coordinator-Certification-Course-Materials.doc.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Jerold S. 1983. Justice Without Laws?. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M., and Schoenherr, R.A. 1971. Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Blocher, Joseph. 2012. “Order without Judges: Customary Adjudication.” Duke Law Journal 62: 579–605.Google Scholar
Bush, Robert A.B., and Folger, Joseph P. 1994. The Promise of Mediation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Campbell, Rebecca. 2006. “Rape Survivors' Experiences with the Legal and Medical Systems: Do Rape Victim Advocates Make a Difference?” Violence Against Women 12(1): 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantor, David, Fisher, Bonnie, Chibnall, Susan, Harps, Shauna, Townsend, Reanne, Thomas, Gail, Lee, Hyunshik, Kranz, Vanessa, Herbison, Randy, and Madden, Kristin. 2019. Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Misconduct, Accessed March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: American Association of American Universities. https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU-Files/Key-Issues/CampusSafety/Revised%20Aggregate%20report%20%20and%20appendices%201-7_(01-16-2020_FINAL).pdfGoogle Scholar
Center for Public Integrity (CPI). 2010. Sexual Assault on Campus: A Frustrating Search for Justice. Accessed November 20, 2020. https://cloudfront-files1.publicintegrity.org/documents/pdfs/Sexual%20Assault%20on%20Campus.pdfGoogle Scholar
Chase, Susan E. 2005. “Narrative Inquiry: Multiple Lenses, Approaches, Choices.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., edited by Den-zin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S., 651-80. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Chronicle for Higher Education. n.d. “Campus Sexual Assault Under Investigation.” Accessed July 1, 2021. http://projects.chronicle.com/titleix/.Google Scholar
Clandinin, D. Jean, and Connelly, Michael F. 2000. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Coker, Donna. 2016. “Crime Logic, Campus Sexual Assault, and Restorative Justice.” Texas Tech Law Review 49: 147–210.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., and O'Barr, William M. 1990. Rules Versus Relationships: The Ethnography of Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conley, John M., O'Barr, William M., and Allan Lind, E. 1978. “The Power of Language: Presentation Style in the Courtroom.” Duke Law Journal 1978(6): 1375-99.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard, Dunn, Chris, Brown, Pamela, Lee, Helena, and Hubbert, David. 1985. “Fairness and Formality: Minimizing the Risk of Prejudice in Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Wisconsin Law Review 1985: 1359–404.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48(2): 147-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank, and Kelly, Erin L. 2007. “How to Stop Harassment: Professional Construction of Legal Compliance in Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 112(4): 1203-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1990. “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the Work Place.” American Journal of Sociology 95(6): 1401-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” American Journal of Sociology 97(6): 1531-76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Kreiger, Linda H., Eliason, Scott R., Albiston, Catherine R., and Mellema, Virginia. 2011. “When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures.” American Journal of Sociology 117(3): 888–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Leachman, Gwendolyn, and McAdam, Doug. 2010. “On Law, Organizations, and Social Movements.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 653-85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Uggen, Christopher, and Erlanger, Howard S. 1999. “The Endogeneity of Legal Regulation: Grievance Procedures as Rational Myth.” American Journal of Sociology. 105(2): 406-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, Robert. 1991. Order without Law: How Neighbors Settle Disputes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles. 2009. Making Rights Real. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiss, Owen M. 1984. “Against Settlement.” The Yale Law Journal 93: 1073-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE). 2017. Spotlight on Due Process 2017. Accessed November 20, 2020. https://www.thefire.org/due-process-report-2017.Google Scholar
Gadlin, Howard. 2000. “The Ombudsman: What's in a Name?” Negotiation Journal 16(1): 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaskell, George. 2000. “Individual and Group Interviewing.” In Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound, edited by Bauer, Martin and Gaskell, George, 38–56. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gould, Jon B., and Barclay, Scott. 2012. “Mind the Gap: The Place of Gap Studies in Sociolegal Scholarship.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8: 323-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Judith, and Thorogood, Nicki. 2004. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Grillo, Trina. 1991. “The Mediation Alternative: Process Dangers for Women.” Yale Law Journal 100: 1545–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Samantha, and Johnson, K.C. 2019. “Campus Courts in Court: The Rise in Judicial Involvement in Campus Sexual Misconduct Adjudications.” New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy. 22: 49–127.Google Scholar
Harrison, Tyler R. 2004. “Ombuds Processes and Disputant Reconciliation.” Journal of Applied Communications Research 32(4): 318-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Tyler R., and Doerfel, Marya L. 2006. “Competitive and Cooperative Conflict Communication Climates: The Influence of Ombuds Processes on Trust and Commitment to the Organization.” International Journal of Conflict Management 17(2): 129-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensler, Deborah R. 2014. “The Private in Public, the Public in Private: The Blurring Boundary between Public and Private Dispute Resolution.” In Formalisation and Flexibilisation in Dispute Resolution, edited by Zekoll, Joachim, Balz, Moritz, and Aemlung, Iwo, 45–68. Ipswich, MA: EBSCO.Google Scholar
Holland, Kathryn J., Cortina, Lilia M., and Freyd, Jennifer J. 2018. “Compelled Disclosure of College Sexual Assault.” American Psychologist 73(3): 256-68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Ombuds Association. n.d. “IOA Standards of Practice.” Accessed March 23, 2020. https://www.ombudsassociation.org/assets/docs/IOA_Standards_of_Practice_Oct09.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jones, Susan R., Torres, Vasti, and Arminio, Jan. 2014. Negotiating the Complexities of Qualitative Research in Higher Education, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karjane, Heather M., Fisher, Bonnie S., and Cullen, Francis T. 2002. Campus Sexual Assault: How America's Institutions of Higher Education Respond. Accessed on March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/196676.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kostritsky, Juliet P. 2013. “The Law and Economics of Norms.” Texas International Law Journal 48(3): 465–505.Google Scholar
Levin-Finley, Samantha, and Carter, John S. 2010. “Then and now: Interviews with expert U.S. organizational ombudsmen.” Conflict Resolution Quarterly 28(2): 111–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madigan, Lee, and Gamble, Nancy C. 1991. The Second Rape. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olson, Johan P. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
March, James G., and Olson, Johan P. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Maynard-Moody, Steven, and Musheno, Michael. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. 1997. “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms.” Michigan Law Review 96: 338–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, Clare, Westmarland, Nicole, and Godden, Nikki. 2012. “I Just Wanted Him to Hear Me’: Sexual Violence and the Possibilities of Restorative Justice.” Journal of Law and Society 39(2): 213-40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1984. “Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving.” UCLA Law Review 31: 754–842.Google Scholar
Menkel-Meadow, Carrie. 1995. “Whose Dispute Is It Anyway?: A Philosophical and Democratic Defense of Settlement (in Some Cases).” Georgetown Law Journal 83: 2663-96.Google Scholar
Meyer, John, and Rowan, Brian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Robert H., and Kornhauser, Lewis. 1979. “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce.” Yale Law Journal 88: 950-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan-Haley, Jacqueline M. 2012. “Mediation: The ‘New Arbitration.’” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 17: 61–96.Google Scholar
Nolan-Haley, Jacqueline M. 2018. “Does ADR's ‘Access to Justice’ Come at the Expense of Meaningful Consent?” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 33(3): 373-96.Google Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2001. January. Revised Sexual Harassment Guidance: Harassment of Students by School Employees, Other Students, or Third Parties. Accessed November 20, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/shguide.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2011. April 4 Dear Colleague Letter (DCL). Accessed March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-201104.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2014. April 29 Questions and Answers on Title IX and Sexual Violence (Q&A). Accessed March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/qa-201404-title-ix.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2016a. Oct. 12 Wesley College Letter. Accessed November 20, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/03152329-a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2016b. Oct. 31 CUNY- Hunter College Letter. Accessed November 20, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/investigations/more/02132052-a.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2017a. September 22 Dear Colleague Letter (DCL). Accessed March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/letters/colleague-title-ix-201709.pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_term=Google Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2017b. September Q&A on Campus Sexual Misconduct. Accessed March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/qa-title-ix-201709.pdf?utm_content=&utm_medium=email&utm_name=&utm_source=govdelivery&utm_termGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2018. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance, 83 Fed. Reg. 61462 (proposed Nov. 29, 2018), to be codified at 34 C.F.R. § 106 (2020). Accessed March 23, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/title-ix-nprm.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office for Civil Rights (OCR). 2020. Summary of Major Provisions of the Department of Education's Title IX Final Rule. Accessed November 28, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/titleix-summary.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office of Justice Programs (OJP). 2014. Rape and Sexual Assault Victimization Among College Age Females, 1995-2013. Accessed November 20, 2020. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/rsavcaf9513.pdfGoogle Scholar
Orcutt, Madison, Petrowski, Patricia M., Karp, David R., and Draper, Jordan. 2020. “Restorative Justice Approaches to the Informal Resolution of Student Sexual Misconduct.” Journal of College and University Law 45(2): 1–76.Google Scholar
Pappas, Brian A. 2015a. “Ombuds and Title IX Coordinators: Procedural Convergence of University Dispute Resolution Mechanisms for Handling Sexual Misconduct.” Doctoral Dissertation, Public Administration, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Pappas, Brian A. 2015b. “Med-Arb and the Legalization of Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 20: 157–203.Google Scholar
Pappas, Brian A. 2016. “Out from the Shadows: Title IX, University Ombuds, and the Reporting of Campus Sexual Misconduct.” Denver Law Review 94(1): 71–144.Google Scholar
Pappas, Brian A. 2019a. “Rules Versus Relationships and Campus Sexual Misconduct.” International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior 22(3): 226-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Brian A. 2019b. “Sexual Misconduct on Campus: Setting a Course for Handling Cases Properly—And Changing the Culture.” Dispute Resolution Magazine 25(2): 21-4.Google Scholar
Pappas, Brian A. 2021. “Competition and collaboration: Title IX Coordinators and the barriers to achieving educational equity.” International Journal of Discrimination and the Law 21(2): 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappas, Brian A., Reynolds, Jennifer, and Hinshaw, Art. Forthcoming. “Designing Informal Mechanisms for Claims of Campus Sexual Misconduct.” Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution.Google Scholar
Polkinghorne, Donald E. 1995. “Narrative Configuration in Qualitative Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education. 8: 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portillo, Shannon, Rudes, Daniel, Vigilione, Jill, and Nelson, Matthew. 2013. “Front-Stage Stars and Backstage Producers: The Role of Judges in Problem-Solving Courts.” Victims and Offenders 8(1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pound, Roscoe. 1910. “Law in Books and Law in Action.” American Law Review 44: 12-5.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith. 1986. “Failing Faith: Adjudicatory Procedure in Decline.” University of Chicago Law Review 53: 494–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H. 2013. “Natural law & Lawlessness: Modern Lessons from Pirates, Lepers, Eskimos, and Survivors.” University of Illinois Law Review 2013: 433–506.Google Scholar
Scott, W. Richard, and Meyer, John W. 1983. “The Organization of Societal Sectors.” In Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality, edited by Meyer, John W. and Richard Scott, W., 129-53. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip. 1969. Law, Society, and Industrial Justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Debra, and Kolb, Deborah. 1994. “Reducing the ‘Litigious Mentality’ by Increasing Employees' Desire to Communicate Grievances.” In The Legalistic Organization, edited by Sitkin, Sim and Bies, Robert J., 304-26. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1986. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stake, Robert E. 2006. Multiple Case Study Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Van Brunt, Brian. 2015. “A Summary and Analysis of the 2015 ATIXA Member Survey.” Journal of Campus Title IX Compliance and Best Practices 1(1): 34–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soye, Scott C. 2007. “Illusory Ethics: Legal Barriers to an Ombudsman's Compliance with Accepted Ethical Standards.” Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal 8: 117-46.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society, 4th ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Merle H. 2017. “A Principled and Legal Approach to Title IX Reporting.” Tennessee Law Review 85(1): 71–188.Google Scholar
Wiersma-Mosley, Jacquelyn D., and DiLoreto, James. 2018. “The Role of Title IX Coordinators on College and University Campuses.” Behavioral Sciences 8(38): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woll, Peter. 1961. “Administrative Justice: Formal Prescription and Informal Adjudication.” The Western Political Quarterly 14(3): 647-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolford, Andrew, and Ratner, R.S. 2010. “Disrupting the Informal-Formal Justice Complex: On the Transformative Potential of Civil Mediation, Restorative Justice and Reparations Politics.” Contemporary Justice Review 13(1): 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

STATUTES CITED

Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. § 1681; 2006 & Supp. V. 2011.Google Scholar