Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T09:34:31.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Punishment's Legal Templates: A Theory of Formal Penal Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Ashley T. Rubin Open the ORCID record for Ashley T. Rubin [Opens in a new window]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The well-known gap between law on the books and law in action often casts doubt on the significance of changes to law on the books. For example, the rise and fall of penal technologies have long been considered significant indicators of penal change in socio-historical analyses of punishment. Recent research, however, has challenged the significance of apparently large-scale penal change of this kind. This article clarifies the significance of penal technologies' rise and fall by offering an alternative account of formal penal change, introducing the analytical concept of “legal templates,” structural models of legal activity (e.g., punishment) available for authorization and replication across multiple jurisdictions. Analyzing punishment's templates explains how new penal technologies can be important harbingers of change, even when they fail to revolutionize penal practice and are not caused by a widespread ideological shift. This article locates the significance of punishment's legal templates in their constitutive power—their ability, over the long term, to shape cognitive-cultural expectations about what punishment is or should be. This power appears only when the template is widely adopted by a plurality of jurisdictions, thereby becoming institutionalized. Ultimately, these institutionalized templates define the scope of future punishment.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 518 - 553
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I wish to thank the anonymous referees and LSR editors, as well as Ellen Berrey, Ronit Dinovitzer, Laurie Edelman, Malcolm Feeley, Phil Goodman, Steve Hoffman, Johann Koehler, Sida Liu, Paula Maurutto, Fergus McNeill, and Joshua Page for reading earlier drafts of this article and providing very helpful comments (extra thanks to Steve Hoffman for reading two versions of the article). I am also grateful to Kelly Hannah-Moffat, Heather Schoenfeld, and John Eason for talking through the paper's ideas. All flaws are my own. A previous version of this article was presented at the 2016 Penal Boundaries Workshop at the University of Toronto.

References

Albiston, C. R. (2005) “Bargaining in the Shadow of Social Institutions: Competing Discourses and Social Change in Workplace Mobilization of Civil Rights,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, F. (1981) The Decline of the Rehabilitative Ideal: Penal Policy and Social Purpose. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Banner, S. (2002) The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, V. (2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way American Punishes Offenders. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1967) The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Bordt, R. L. & Musheno, M. C. (1988) “Bureaucratic Co-Optation of Informal Dispute Processing: Social Control as an Effect of Inmate Grievance Policy,” 25 J. of Research in Crime and Delinquency 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, H. N. & Boyle, E. H. (2018) “The Global Adoption of National Policies Protecting Children from Violent Discipline in Schools and Homes, 1950–2011,” 52 Law & Society Rev. 206–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Bumiller, K. (1987) “Victims in the Shadow of the Law: A Critique of the Model of Legal Protection,” 12 Signs 421–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calahan, M. (1986) Historical Corrections Statistics in the United States, 1850–1984, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
Calavita, K. & Jenness, V. (2015) Appealing to Justice: Prisoner Grievances, Rights, and Carceral Logic. Oakland: UC Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, M. C. & Schoenfeld, H. (2013) “The Transformation of America's Penal Order: A Historicized Political Sociology of Punishment,” 118 American J. of Sociology 1375–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, M. C., Vogel, M., & Williams, J. (2015) “Historical Contingencies and the Evolving Importance of Race, Violent Crime, and Region in Explaining Mass Incarceration in the United Tates,” 53 Criminology 180–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S. (1979) “The Punitive City: Notes on the Dispersal of Social Control,” 3 Crime, Law and Social Change 339–63.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. & Powell, W. W. (1983) “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” 48 American Sociological Rev. 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1984[1893]) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (1990) “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace,” 95 American J. of Sociology 1401–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, L. B. (2016) Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Civil Rights. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, L. B. & Suchman, M. C. (1999) “When the “Haves” Hold Court: Speculations on the Organizational Internalization of Law,” 33 Law & Society Rev. 941–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. (1986) “Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution among Neighbors in Shasta County,” 38 Stanford Law Rev. 623–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewick, P. & Silbey, S. S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeley, M. & Rubin, E. (2000) Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Feeley, M. M. & Simon, J. (1992) “The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications,” 30 Criminology 449–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Frank, D. J., Camp, B. J., & Boutcher, S. A. (2010) “Worldwide Trends in the Criminal Regulation of Sex, 1945 to 2005,” 75 American Sociological Rev. 867–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, R. & Alford, R. R. (1991) “Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions,” in Powell, W. W. & DiMaggio, P. J., eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. 232–63.Google Scholar
Friedman, L. M. (2016) Impact: How Law Affects Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, D. (1985) Punishment and Welfare. Brookfield, VT: Gower.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2003) “Penal Modernism and Postmodernism,” in Blomberg, T. G. & Cohen, S., eds., Punishment and Social Control. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 45–71.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2010) Peculiar Institution: America's Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Garland, D. (2013) “Penality and the Penal State,” 51 Criminology 475–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, P., Page, J., & Phelps, M. (2017) Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. W. (1984) “Critical Legal Histories,” 36 Stanford Law Rev. 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschalk, M. (2006) The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, M. (2014) Caught: The Prison State and the Lockdown of American Politics. Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Grattet, R., Jenness, V., & Curry, T. R. (1998) “The Homogenization and Differentiation of Hate Crime Law in the United States, 1978 to 1995: Innovation and Diffusion in the Criminalization of Bigotry,” 63 American Sociological Rev. 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hans, V. P. (2017) “Trial by Jury: Story of a Legal Transplant,” 51 Law & Society Rev. 471–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, S. F. & Lazarus-Black, M. (1994) “Introduction/Performance and Paradox: Exploring law's Role in Hegemony and Resistance,” in Lazarus-Black, M. & Hirsch, S., eds., Contested States: Law, Hegemony, and Resistance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1978) A Just Measure of Pain: The Penitentiary in the Industrial Revolution, 1750–1850. New York: Pantheon Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, J. (2005) The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. B. (1977) Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Karch, A. & Cravens, M. (2014) “Rapid Diffusion and Policy Reform: The Adoption and Modification of Three Strikes Laws,” 14 State Politics & Policy Q. 461–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, C. M. (2001) “The Establishment of a Police Gang Unit: An Examination of Organizational and Environmental Factors,” 39 Criminology 37–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruttschnitt, C. & Gartner, R. (2005) Marking Time in the Golden State: Women's Imprisonment in California. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Law, D. S. & Versteeg, M. (2011) “The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism,” California Law Rev. 1163–257.Google Scholar
Leon, C. (2011) Sex Fiends, Perverts, and Pedophiles: Understanding Sex Crime Policy in America. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Liu, S. & Wu, H. (2016) “The Ecology of Organizational Growth: Chinese Law Firms in the Age of Globalization,” 122 American J. of Sociology 798–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. (1998) “Waste Managers? The New Penology, Crime Fighting, and Parole Agent Identity,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 839–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, M. (2010) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, M. (2011) “Mass Incarceration, Legal Change, and Locale,” 10 Criminology & Public Policy 673–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, S. (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Rev. 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLennan, R. M. (2008) The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meranze, M. (1996) Laboratories of Virtue: Punishment, Revolution, and Authority in Philadelphia, 1760–1835. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977) “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony,” 83 American J. of Sociology 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, L. (2008) The Perils of Federalism: Race, Poverty, and the Politics of Crime. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirchandani, R. (2005) “What's So Special about Specialized Courts? The State and Social Change in Salt Lake City's Domestic Violence Court,” 39 Law & Society Rev. 379–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. L. (1981) “Practice and Privilege: Social Change and the Structure of Large Law Firms,” 6 Law & Social Inquiry 97–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, L. B. (2000) “Situating Legal Consciousness: Experiences and Attitudes of Ordinary Citizens about Law and Street Harassment,” 34 Law & Society Rev. 1055–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oshinsky, D. (1997) Worse than Slavery: Parchman Farm and the Ordeal of Jim Crow Justice. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Page, J. (2011) The Toughest Beat: Politics, Punishment, and the Prison Officers Union in California. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, J. (2012) “Punishment and the Penal Field,” in Simon, J. & Sparks, R., eds., The Sage Handbook of Punishment and Society. SAGE. 152.Google Scholar
Perkinson, R. (2008) Texas Tough: The Rise of America's Prison Empire. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Phelps, M. S. (2011) “Rehabilitation in the Punitive Era: The Gap between Rhetoric and Reality in U.S. Prison Programs,” 45 Law & Society Rev. 33–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pisciotta, A. (1994) Benevolent Repression: Social Control and the American Reformatory-Prison Movement. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rafter, N. (1985) Partial Justice: Women in State Prisons, 1800–1935. Boston: Northeastern. Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. (2016) 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. A. (2012a) The Most Restrictive Alternative: The Origins, Functions, Control, and Ethical Implications of the Supermax Prison, 1976–2010. PhD thesis, U.C. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Reiter, K. A. (2012b) “The Most Restrictive Alternative: A Litigation History of Solitary Confinement in U.S. Prisons, 1960–2006,” 57 Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 71–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, K. A. (2012c) “Parole, Snitch, or Die: California's Supermax Prisons and Prisoners, 1997–2007,” 14 Punishment & Society 530–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, G. & McNeill, F., eds. (2015) Community Punishment: European Perspectives. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G. (1991) The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothman, D. J. (1980) Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and its Alternatives in Progressive America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. & Phelps, M. S. (2017) “Fracturing the Penal State: State Actors and the Role of Conflict in Penal Change,” 21 Theoretical Criminology 422–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, A. T. (2013) Institutionalizing the Pennsylvania System: Organizational Exceptionalism, Administrative Support, and Eastern State Penitentiary, 1829–1875. PhD thesis, U.C. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. (2014) “Three Waves of American Prison Development, 1790–1920,” in Punishment and Incarceration: A Global Perspective. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. 139–58.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. (2015) “A Neo-Institutional Account of Prison Diffusion,” 49 Law & Society Rev. 365–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A. T. (2016) “Penal Change as Penal Layering: A Case Study of Proto-Prison Adoption and Capital Punishment Reduction, 1785–1822,” 18 Punishment & Society 420–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A. T. (2018) “The Prehistory of Innovation: A Longer View of Penal Change,” 20 Punishment & Society 192–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, A. T. 2020) The Deviant Prison: Philadelphia's Eastern State Penitentiary and the Origins of America's Modern Penal System, 1829–1913. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, A. T. (N.D.) Innovation and diffusion: Theorizing penal change before and after the ideal type. Manuscript in Progress (Available by Request).Google Scholar
Rusche, G. & Kirchheimer, O. (1939) Punishment and Social Structure. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savelsberg, J. J., Cleveland, L. L., & King, R. D. (2004) “Institutional Environments and Scholarly Work: American Criminology, 1951–1993,” 82 Social Forces 1275–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, H. (2011) “Putting Politics in Penal Policy Reform,” 10 Criminology & Public Policy 715–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoenfeld, H. (2014) “The Delayed Emergence of Penal Modernism in Florida,” 16 Punishment & Society 258–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R. W. (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. (2003) Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, fifth ed. Sage.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Simon, J. (2013) “Punishment and the Political Technologies of the Body,” in Simon, J. & Sparks, R., eds., The Sage Handbook of Punishment and Society. London: Sage. 60–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, J. & Collier, J. F. (1989) History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Strang, D. & Meyer, J. W. (1993) “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion,” 22 Theory and Society 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995) “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” 20 The Academy of Management Rev. 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. C. & Edelman, L. B. (1996) “Legal Rational Myths: The New Institutionalism and the Law and Society Tradition,” 21 Law & Social Inquiry 903–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolbert, P. S. & Zucker, L. G. (1983) “Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880–1935,” 28 Administrative Science Q. 22–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, J. J., Mastrofski, S. D., & Weisburd, D. (2007) “Making Sense of COMPSTAT: A Theory-Based Analysis of Organizational Change in Three Police Departments,” 41 Law & Society Rev. 147–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimring, F. (2006) The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, F., Kamin, S., & Hawkins, G. (2001) Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're out in California. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Zimring, F. E. (2001) “Imprisonment Rates and the New Politics of Criminal Punishment,” 3 Punishment & Society 161–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar