Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T23:58:36.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflections on the Reach of Law (and Society) Post 9/11: An American Superhero?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Lynn Mather
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Presidential Address and Commentaries
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , June 2003 , pp. 263 - 282
Copyright
© 2003 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I am grateful to the 2002 Law and Society Association/Canadian Law and Society Association Program committee and to the Canadian Law and Society Association leadership for showing me firsthand the importance of the themes I address in this article. I thank Hilary Sommerlad for our conversation in Oxford, which encouraged me to tackle this topic. I greatly appreciate the helpful feedback, comments, and suggestions I received from David Engel, Laura Margan, and Barbara Yngvesson.

References

Abel, Richard L. (1978) “From the Editor,” 12 Law & Society Rev. 489–97.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. (1998) “Speaking Law to Power,” in Sarat, A., & Scheingold, S., eds. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence, & Canon, Bradley C. (1981) “Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines,” 75 American Political Science Rev. 975–87.Google Scholar
Brockman, Joan (2001) Gender in the Legal Profession: Fitting or Breaking the Mould. Vancouver: Univ. of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Brockman, Joan (2003) “The Impact of Institutional Structure and Power on Law and Society: Is it Time for Reawakening?,” 37 Law & Society Rev. 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Axel (1999) “Invading the Ivory Tower: Hypertext and the New Dilettante Scholars,” M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture. http://www.uq.edu.au/mc/9903/ivory.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calavita, Kitty (2002) “Engaged Research, ‘Goose Bumps,’ and the Role of the Public Intellectual,” 36 Law & Society Rev. 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Colin M., & Wiles, Paul (1976) “The Study of Law in Society in Britain,” 10 Law & Society Rev. 547–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassels, Jamie (1993) The Uncertain Promise of Law. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Daynard, Richard A. (1988) “Tobacco Liability Litigation as a Cancer Control Strategy,” 80 J. of the National Cancer Institute 9–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derthick, Martha (2002) Up in Smoke: From Legislation to Litigation in Tobacco Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, & Garth, Bryant G. (2002) The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economist, and the Context to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickey, John Sloan (1975) http://www.dartmouth.edu/~dickey/dickey_can_us.html.Google Scholar
Dingwall, Robert (2003) “LSA and the ‘Pax Americana,’” 37 Law & Society Rev. 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Diana (2002) “Letter to the Editor,” New York Times, 8 May, p. A30.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Kagan, Robert A., Cartwright, Bliss, & Wheeler, Stanton (1981) “State Supreme Courts: A Century of Style and Citation,” 33 Stanford Law Rev. 773–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1976) “From the Editor,” 10 Law & Society Rev. 483–88.Google Scholar
Garth, Bryant, & Sterling, Joyce (1998) “From Legal Realism to Law and Society: Reshaping Law for the Last Stages of the Social Activist State,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 409–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard (1994) “On Constructing a Science of Comparative Judicial Politics: Tate & Haynie's ‘Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts,’” 28 Law & Society Rev. 355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodale, Mark (2002) “The Globalization of Sympathetic Law and Its Consequences,” 27 Law & Social Inquiry 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhouse, Carol J. (1998) “Tuning to a Key of Gladness,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossberg, Michael (1997) “Historical Journals in the 21st Century,” Perspectives Online.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, & Kay, Fiona (1995) Gender in Practice: A Study of Lawyers’ Lives. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Handler, Joel F. (1992) “Postmodernism, Protest, and the New Social Movements,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 697–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary (2002) “The Reach and the Grasp of Law.” Presented at the joint Canadian Law and Society Association and Law and Society Association meeting, Vancouver, Canada (June).Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. (2001) Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., & Sikkink, Kathryn (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Stan (2002) “That's My Spidey,” New York Times, 3 May, p. A27.Google Scholar
Levine, Felice J. (1990) “Goose Bumps and ‘The Search for Signs of Intelligent Life’ in Sociolegal Studies: After Twenty-five Years,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 7–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Sanford (1993) “Identifying the Jewish Lawyer: Reflections of the Construction of Professional Identity,” 14 Cardozo Law Rev. 1577–612.Google Scholar
Lyman, Rick (2003) ““Not Bad, Clones, But Watch Spidey's Legs,” New York Times, 20 May, p. B1.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Roderick A. (2002) Lessons of Everyday Law (Le Droit du Quotidien). Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine (1979) Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex Discrimination. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Isabel, Spiegelman, Paul J., DuBois, Ellen Carol, Dunlap, Mary C., Gilligan, Carol J., MacKinnon, Catharine A., & Menkel-Meadow, Carrie J. (1985) “Feminist Discourse, Moral Values, and the Law—a Conversation,” 34 Buffalo Law Rev. 11–87.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn (1998) “Theorizing About Trial Courts: Lawyers, Policymaking, and Tobacco Litigation,” 23 Law & Social Inquiry 897–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, Lynn, & Yngvesson, Barbara (198081) “Language, Audience and the Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 775–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. (1992) “Resistance, Reconstruction, and Romance in Legal Scholarship,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 733–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, Neal (2002) “Illusions and Delusions about Conflict Management—In Africa and Elsewhere,” 27 Law & Social Inquiry 621–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Sally Falk (1969) “Introduction,” in Nader, L., ed., Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Morales, Antonio (1998) “Pragmatism's Mundanity: Epistemic Foundations for Practicing Sociolegal Science,” 32 Law & Society Rev. 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nader, Laura (1969) “Introduction,” in Nader, L., ed., Law in Culture and Society. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura, & Grande, Elizabeth (2002) “Current Illusions and Delusions about Conflict Management—In Africa and Elsewhere,” 27 Law & Social Inquiry 573–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Barr, William M. (1995) “From the Editor,” 29 Law & Society Rev. 5–9.Google Scholar
Rayanakorn, Kobkun (2002) “Women and the Law in the Greater Mekong Subregion.” Presented at Symposium on “The Reach of Law in the Pacific Rim,” University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N., & Williams, John M. (1998) “Do Not Go Gently into that Good Right: The First Amendment in the High Court of Australia,” 1997, The Supreme Court Rev. 439–95.Google Scholar
Sarat, , Austin, , & Scheingold, Stuart, eds. (1998) Cause Lawyering: Political Commitment and Professional Responsibilities. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Ulrike, & Shaw, Gisela (2002) Women in the World's Legal Professions. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Seron, Carroll (2002) “The Teacher-Scholar,” 36 Law & Society Rev. 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerlad, Hilary, & Sanderson, Peter (1998) Gender, Choice and Commitment: Women Solicitors in England and Wales and the Struggle for Equal Status. Hampshire, England: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
Stein, Joel (2002) “Biggest Summer,” Time, 20 May, p. 70.Google Scholar
Snyder, Ilana (1996) Hypertext: The Electronic Labyrinth. Cartlon South, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, & Haynie, Stacia L. (1993) “Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961–1987,” 27 Law & Society Rev. 707–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, & Haynie, Stacia L. (1994) “Building a Scientific Comparative Judicial Politics and Arousing the Dragons of Antiscientism,” 28 Law & Society Rev. 377–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David (1998) “Fragmenting Professionalism: Racial Identity and the Ideology of Bleached-Out Lawyering,” 5 International J. of the Legal Profession 141–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Steven L. (1992) “For What It's Worth,” 26 Law & Society Rev. 789–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2002) “Towards Health with Justice: Litigation and Public Inquiries as Tools for Tobacco Control,” http://www.who.int/enGoogle Scholar
Yoshino, Kenji (2003) “Law of the Bedroom,” Boston Sunday Globe, 23 March, p. H4.Google Scholar