Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:21:34.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three Metaphors for a New Conception of Law: The Frontier, the Baroque, and the South

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Boaventura de Sousa Santos
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are entering a period of paradigmatic transition. From the paradigm of modernity we have come to a new paradigm which by now can only be defined inadequately. The inevitability of such inadequacy lends to the name of postmodernity its grain of truth. Periods of paradigmatic transition are periods of fierce competition among rival epistemologies and knowledges. They are, therefore, periods of radical thinking—both deconstructive and reconstructive thinking. When viewed from the old outgoing paradigm, they are periods of unthinking or of utopia. When viewed from the new, incoming paradigm, they are periods of temporary and fragile scaffoldings, emergent ruins sustaining nothing but themselves, witnessing nothing but the future. In periods of paradigmatic transition, all competing knowledges reveal themselves as rhetorical in nature, bundles of arguments and of premises of argumentation which circulate inside rhetorical audiences. Indeed, what distinguishes the audiences are the specific arguments and premises of argumentation that they consider valid and convincing or persuasive. In the specific paradigmatic transition we are now entering, any given discipline, be it sociology of law or archeology, tends to be constituted by a larger or smaller number of rival rhetorical audiences. The level of real communication among them is very low and whatever they do in common—books, journals, and conferences—has much more to do with the dominant institutional production of knowledge than with the knowledge produced. In the early stages of the paradigmatic transition, such as the one we are in now, the most fundamental cleavage is between the audiences that deny the very existence of the paradigmatic transition—these we may call the subparadigmatic audiences—and the audiences that assume the existence of such transition. The latter I call the paradigmatic audiences. I would imagine that in this room we have both types of audiences. My argument, being a paradigmatic one, will no doubt be unequally convincing for the different audiences present here today; as such, it will contribute to confirming the different audiences in their differences.

Type
Charting a Course for Sociolegal Scholarship: A Symposium
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , 1995 , pp. 569 - 584
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Law and Society Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

At the invitation of the Law and Society Association's President Sally Engle Merry, this address was presented to the Association during its Annual Meeting, 3 June 1995 in Toronto. The text is an adapted and simplified version of chapter 8 of Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition (New York: Routledge, 1995).

References

Adorno, Theodor (1978) Minima Moralia. London: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Barrios, Marco A. G. (1993) Economia y cultura politica barroca. Mexico City: Univ. Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
Bergin, Thomas Goddard, & Fisch, Max Harold, eds. (1968) The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Buci-Glucksmann, Christine (1984) La raison baroque, de Bandelaire à Benjamin. Paris: Galilee.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernest (1965) The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernest (1963) The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1969) American Powers and the New Mandarins. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1982) Towards a New Cold War: Essays on the Current Crisis and How to Get There. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1985) Turning the Tide: U.S. Intervention in Central America and the Struggle for Peace. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1987) The Chomsky Reader, ed. J. Peck. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam (1989) Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in a Democratic Society. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, & Herman, Edward (1988) Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Afranio (1968) A literatura no Brasil, vol. 1. 2d ed. Rio de Janeiro: Sul Americana.Google Scholar
Coutinho, Afranio (1990) “O barroco e o maneirismo,” Claro Escuro, nos. 4–5, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
Cronon, William G., Miles, G., & Gitlin, J., eds. (1992) Under an Open Sky: Rethinking America's Western Past. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Desroche, Henri (1975) La societé festive: Du Fouriérisme écrit aux Fouriérismes pratiqués. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Echeverria, Bolivar, et al. (1991–93) “El mestizaje cultural y lo barroco en America.” Research project, Facultad de Filosofia y Letras, Univ. Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Russell, et al., eds. (1990) Out There: Marginalization and Comtemporary Cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1976) La volonté de savior. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977) Discipline and Punish. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fourier, Charles (1967) Theorie des quatre mouvements et des destinées generales. Paris: Jean Jacques Pauvert.Google Scholar
Gandhi (1951) Selected Writings of Mahatma Gandhi. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Gandhi (1956) The Gandhi Reader, ed. H. A. Jack. Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Guha, Ranajit (1984–89) Subaltern Studies: Writings on South Asian History and Society. Several vols. Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1985) “Jürgen Habermas: A Philosophico-Political Profile,” 151 New Left Rev. 75.Google Scholar
Hatherly, Ana, et al., eds. (1990) “Barroco e neobarroco,” Claro Escuro, nos. 4–5 (Special Issue).Google Scholar
Hayden, Dolores (1981) The Grand Domestic Revolution: A History of Feminist Designs for American Homes, Neighborhoods and Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell (1990) “Marginality as Site of Resistance,” in Ferguson et al. 1990.Google Scholar
Jonas, Hans (1985) Das Prinzip der Verantwortung. 5th ed. Frankfurt Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
Leon, Antonio Garcia (1993) “Contrapunto entre lo barroco y lo popular en el Veracruz Colonial.” Presented at International Colloquium “Modernidad Europea, Mestizage Cultural y Ethos Barroco,” Univ. Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, 17–20 May.Google Scholar
Manrique, Jorge Alberto (1981) “Del Barroco a la Ilustracion,” in 1 Historia general de Mexico. Mexico City (no publisher given).Google Scholar
Maravall, Jose Antonio (1990) La cultura del barroco. 5th ed. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Moylan, Tom (1986) Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Pastor, Alba, et al. (1993) Aproximaciones al mundo barroco latinoamericano. Mexico City: Univ. Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
Piercy, Marge (1976) Woman on the Edge of Time. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, Maria Aparecida (1990) “Qual barroco? Qual Brasil?” Claro Escuro, nos. 4–5, pp. 17–22.Google Scholar
Roy, Alain, & Tamen, Isabel, eds. (1990) Routes du baroque: La contribution du baroque à la pensée et à l'art Européens. Lisbon: Secretaria de Estado da Cultura.Google Scholar
Said, Edward (1990) “Reflexions on Exile,” in Ferguson et al. 1990.Google Scholar
Santos, Santos Boaventura de (1995) Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sargent, Pamela (1974) Women of Wonder. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sargent, Pamela (1976) More Women of Wonder. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Sargent, Pamela (1978) The New Women of Wonder. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich (1967) On the Aesthetic Education of Man, ed. & trans. E. Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1990) Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Wölfflin, Heinrich (1979) Renaissance and Baroque. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar