Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T02:29:25.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Editor-in-Chief Replies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Correspondence
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , October 1983 , pp. 229
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Committee on Policy for DNR Decisions, Yale-New Haven Hospital, Report on Do Not Resuscitate Decisions, Connecticut Medicine 47(8): 477–83 (August 1983).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Emory University v. Porubiansky, 282 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. 1981); Olson v. Molzen, 558 S.W.2d 429 (Tenn. 1977).Google Scholar
Protection of Human Subjects, 45 C.F.R. §46.116 (1981). “No informed consent, whether oral or written, may include any exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject's legal rights, or releases or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution or its agents from liability for negligence.”Google Scholar
Levine, R. J., Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research (Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore, Md.) (1981) at 101.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar