Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T22:10:35.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Infant Doe Regulations and the Absolute Requirement to Use Nourishment and Fluids for the Dying Infant

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2021

John J. Paris S.J.  and
Anne B. Fletcher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On July 5, 1983. the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a revised version of its Proposed Rules for the so-called Infant Doe Regulations. The regulations are designed to prevent discriminatory denial of medical treatment to handicapped infants. An earlier version published last March had been struck down for procedural defects by Federal District Court Judge Gerhard Gesell. In the course of his opinion, Judge Gesell noted that the regulations touch upon one of the most difficult and sensitive medical and ethical problems facing society—the question of what, if any, life-sustaining medical treatment should be utilized to preserve the lives of severely mentally or physically defective newborn infants.

In his view not only were the original regulations procedurally flawed, but they also were substantively deficient. Arbitrary and capricious was Gesell's phrase to describe HHS's actions in establishing a toll-free 24-hour-a-day hotline on which anonymous tipsters could trigger an investigation of alleged nontreatment.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , October 1983 , pp. 210 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap, 48 Fed. Reg. 30,846 (1983) (to be codified at 45 C.F.R. §84.61(b)) (proposed July 5, 1983) [hereinafter referred to as Proposed Rules].Google Scholar
48 Fed. Reg. 9630 (1983), invalid 48 Fed. Reg.—.Google Scholar
American Academy of Pediatrics v. Heckler, 561 F. Supp. 395, 398 (D.D.C. 1983).Google Scholar
Id. at 399, 403.Google Scholar
Id. at 399.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. No. 93-112 §504 (1973), amended by Exec. Order 11914, 29 U.S.C. §794 (1976).Google Scholar
Proposed Rules, supra note 1, at 30,846.Google Scholar
Id. at 30, 852.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: Ethical, Medical and Legal Issues in Treatment Decisions (U.S. Gov't Printing Ofc., Washington, D.C.) (1983) at 218 [hereinafter referred to as Deciding To Forego Treatment].Google Scholar
Id. at 219.Google Scholar
Proposed Rules, supra note 1, at 30,852.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id. at 30,846.Google Scholar
Washington Post, April 23, 1983, at A2.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Amundsen, D., The Physician's Obligation to Prolong Life: A Medical Duty without Classical Roots, Hastings Center Report 8(4): 23, 24 (August 1978).Google ScholarPubMed
Id. at 24.Google Scholar
McCartney, J.J., The Development of the Doctrine of Ordinary and Extraordinary Means of Preserving Life in Catholic Moral Theology Before the Karen Quinlan Case, Connecticut Medicine 45(11): 725 (November 1981).Google ScholarPubMed
Kelly, G., The Duty of Using Artificial Means of Preserving Life, Theological Studies 11(2): 203, 207 (June 1950).Google Scholar
Id. at 203.Google Scholar
Id. at 215.Google Scholar
Id. at 220.Google Scholar
Healy, E., Medical Ethics (Loyola Univ. Press, Chicago) (1983) at 89.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Deciding to Forego Treatment, supra note 11, at 288 (Appendix B).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See Zerwekh, J.V., The Dehydration Question, Nursing '83 13(1): 49, 51 (January 1983).Google ScholarPubMed