Article contents
Have You Voted? Teaching OSCOLA with Mentimeter
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2018
Abstract
This article details a small project undertaken by Information Skills Advisers at London South Bank University to increase student engagement in lecture theatre settings through the use of a web-based audience response system (ARS), Mentimeter. Supporting the School of Law, librarians delivered an interactive OSCOLA referencing session to a large capacity lecture theatre. A previous session was redesigned to increase student engagement and active learning utilising interactive quiz questions which students answered using mobile devices. The majority of feedback from students and staff who participated in this pilot project was positive and showed an increase in student engagement. This article is based on the presentation, ‘Have You Voted?: Teaching OSCOLA with Mentimeter’ delivered at the BIALL Annual Conference 2017. It will examine the process of adapting a lecture to include interactive content using an ARS, and will discuss the outcomes of the pilot session and explore benefits and challenges inherent in using technology of this type in a large classroom.
- Type
- Selection of Papers from the Biall Conference 2017
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s) 2018. Published by British and Irish Association of Law Librarians
References
Footnotes
1 Abate, Laura E., Gomes, Alexandra and Linton, Anne, ‘Engaging students in active learning: use of a blog and audience response system’, (2011), 30(1) Medical Reference Services Quarterly 12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
2 Hoppenfeld, Jared, ‘Keeping students engaged with web-based polling in the library instruction session’ (2012)(2) Library Hi Tech 235Google Scholar.
3 Bladek, Marta and Okamoto, Karen, ‘What's Theory Got to Do with It? Applying Educational Theory and Research to Revamp Freshman Library Workshops’ (2014) 21(1) College & Undergraduate Libraries 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Habel, Chad and Stubbs, Matthew, ‘Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course’ (2014) 22 Research in Learning Technology 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Judson, Eugene and Sawada, Daiyo, ‘Learning from past and present: electronic response systems in college lecture halls’ (2002) 21(2) Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 167Google Scholar.
6 Dill, Emily, ‘Perspective On…: Do clickers improve library instruction? Lock in your answers now’ (2008) 34(6) The Journal of Academic Librarianship 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Poll Everywhere launched in 2007, Mentimeter launched in 2011, and there are now many web-based audience responses systems on the market aimed at both the business and education sectors.
8 Dill, Emily, ‘Perspective On…: Do clickers improve library instruction? Lock in your answers now’ (2008) 34(6) The Journal of Academic Librarianship 527CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Habel, Chad and Stubbs, Matthew, ‘Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course’ (2014) 22 Research in Learning Technology 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Wang, Alf Inge, ‘The wear out effect of a game-based student response system’ (2015) 82 Computers & Education 217CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
11 Habel, Chad and Stubbs, Matthew, ‘Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course’ (2014) 22 Research in Learning Technology 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Freeman, Mark, Blayney, Paul and Ginns, Paul (2006), ‘Anonymity and in class learning: the case for electronic response systems’. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 568–580 Google Scholar
13 Latham, Alyson and Hill, N. Sharon, ‘Preference for Anonymous Classroom Participation: Linking Student Characteristics and Reactions to Electronic Response Systems’ (2014) 38(2) Journal of Management Education 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 Habel, Chad and Stubbs, Matthew, ‘Mobile phone voting for participation and engagement in a large compulsory law course’ (2014) 22 Research in Learning Technology 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
- 10
- Cited by