Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:28:52.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SPTL/BIALL Academic Law Library Survey 2000/2001

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2008

Cathie Jackson
Affiliation:
Cardiff University

Abstract

This is the latest report arising from the SPTL/BIALL Survey. It was prepared by Cathie Jackson of Cardiff University

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British and Irish Association of Law Librarians 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clinch, Peter (1999a) The SPTL academic law library survey 1997/98: Part I. The Law Librarian 30(3), 202208Google Scholar
Clinch, Peter (1999b) The SPTL academic law library survey 1997/98: Part II. The Law Librarian 30(4), 254261Google Scholar
Clinch, Peter (1998) The BIALL academic law library survey 1996/97. The Law Librarian 29(3), 165177Google Scholar
Clinch, Peter (1997) The SPTL-BIALL survey 1995/96. The Law Librarian 28(1), 2532Google Scholar
Jackson, Cathie (2001) SPTL/BIALL academic law library survey 1999/2000. Legal Information Management 1(2), 2839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Cathie (2000) BIALL academic law library survey 1998/99. The Law Librarian 31(4), 227239Google Scholar
LISU (2001) Average prices of British academic books: January to June 2001 Loughborough: Library and Information Statistics Unit, Loughborough UniversityGoogle Scholar
Society of Public Teachers of Law. (1997) A library for the modern law school. A statement of standards for university law library provision in the United Kingdom – 1997 revision. Legal Studies 17(3), 363414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society of Public Teachers of Law. (1995) A library for the modern law school. A statement of standards for university law library provision in England and Wales. Legal Studies Special issue, 12 1995Google Scholar