No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Evil or Ill? - Justifying the insanity defence by Laurie Reznek. London: Routledge, 1997, xi + 310 + (bibliography + index) 19 pp (paperback £14.99, hardback £45)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1998
References
1. Lacey, N State Punishment (London: Routledge, 1988) p 74 Google Scholar.
2. Arenella, P. ‘Character, Choice and Moral Agency: The Relevance of Character to Our Moral Culpability Judgments’ in Paul, E F et al (eds) Crime, Culpability and Remedy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990) p 61 Google Scholar.
3. Arenella above n 2 p 69.
4. [1960] 3 All ER I.
5. Duff, R. A. Choice, Character and Criminal Liability’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 345, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. See Boulas, N The Yorkshire Ripper: A Case Study of the Sutcliffe Papers (University of Manchester Occasional Papers No 11, 1983)Google Scholar.
7. M Moore ‘Choice, Character and Excuse’ Crime, Culpability and Remedy above n 2, pp 29, 53.
8. [1991] 2 All ER 769.
9. (1992) 95 DLR (4th) 27.
10. For discussion see Mackay, R D Mental Condition Defences in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995) pp 106–108 Google Scholar.
11. Steadman, H J et al Before and After Hinckley: Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform (New York: Guilford, 1993)Google Scholar.