No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Comparative Criminal Procedure by J. Hatchard, B. Huber and R. Vogler, Comparative Law Series, BIICL 1996, xiv + 256 pp (hardback £29.50)
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 January 2018
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0261387500007881/resource/name/firstPage-S0261387500007881a.jpg)
- Type
- Book Review
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1998
References
1. Van Den Wyngaert (ed) Criminal procedure systems in the European Community (1993).
2. Fennell, P (et al eds) Criminal Justice in Europe (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995)Google Scholar.
3. See Ashworth, A The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995) and Sanders, and Young, R Criminal Justice (London: Butterworths, 1994)Google Scholar.
4. Leigh, L H and Zedner, L A Report on the administration of criminal justice in France and Germany Research Study No 1 to RCCJ (London: HMSO, 1993)Google Scholar.
5. McConville, M, Sanders, A and Leng, R The Case for the Prosecution (London: Routledge, 1991) p 36 Google Scholar.
6. See National Crime Facility Investigative Interviewing A Practical Guide (1996).
7. Eg J R Spencer ‘The Neutral Expert: an implausible Bogey’ [1991] Crim LJ 106.
8. Klass v Federal Republic of Germany (1978) 2 EHRR 214 but cp Niemitz v Germany (1992) 16 EHRR 97.
9. See Lord Rodgers at Committee State Stage, Hansard vol 576, col 217.
10. Environmental Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 11 ALR 392 at 404–405.
11. See S Sharpe ‘Disclosure in Criminal cases’ (1996) 62 Criminal Lawyer 5.