1 See also Weinrib, ‘Why Legal Formalism’ in George, (ed) Naturul Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992) pp 352–3;Google Scholar Weinrib ‘Aristotle's Forms of Justice’2 Ratio Juris 211, p 221; Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds) The Rule oflaw: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987) p 64;Google Scholar Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 958.

2 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 959.

3 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 974.

4 Weinrib ‘understanding Tort Law’ 77 Valparaiso University Law Review 485, p 494.

5 Also Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 978; Weinrib ‘corrective Justice’ 77 Iowa Law Review 403, p 419; Weinrib, ‘Why Legal Formalism’ in George, (ed) Natural Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992), p 357.Google Scholar

6 Weinrib ‘Aristotle's Forms of Justice’2 Ratio Juris 211, p 219.

7 Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds), The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987), p 71f.Google Scholar

8 Weinrib, ‘Why Legal Formalism’ in George, (ed) Natural Law Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1992), p 357.Google Scholar

9 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 974.

10 See Weinrib ‘Corrective Justice’77 Iowa Law Review 403; Weinrib ‘Understanding Tort Law’ 77 Valparaiso Universify Law Review 485; Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds), The Rule of law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987).Google Scholar

11 Weinrib, ‘The Intelligibility of the Rule of Law’ in Hutchinson, and Monahan, (eds), The Rule of law: Ideal or Ideology (Toronto: Carswell, 1987) p 71.Google Scholar

12 Weinrib ‘Legal Formalism’ 97 Yale Law Journal 949, p 974.

13 Rawls, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993) p 173.Google Scholar

14 See Broad The Mind and its Place in Nature (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1951) p 488f.

15 See Frankena, ‘The Naturalistic Fallacy’ in Foot (ed) Theories of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1967) p 52.Google Scholar

16 See Brencher, ‘formalism, Positivism, and Natural Law in Ernest Weinrib's Tort Theory: Will the Real Ernest Weinrib Please Come Forward’ University of Toronto Law Journnl 318, p 338.Google Scholar

17 Kelman, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge Mass; London: Harvard University Press, 1987) p 245.Google Scholar

18 Kelman, A Guide to Critical Legal Studies (Cambridge Mass; London: Harvard University Press, 1987) p 258.Google Scholar

19 See Finnis, ‘On “The Critical Legal Studies Movements”’ in Eekelaar, and Bell, (eds) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence 3rd Series (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987).Google Scholar