Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T22:09:23.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Property Rights of Cohabitees, by John Mee. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999, xxxvii + 320 + (index) 11 pp (hardback £30) ISBN 1 901 362 76 0

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. I have used the more usual terminology of ‘cohabitants’ rather than ‘cohabitees’. For criticism of the latter term see M Freeman and C Lyon, Cohabitation Without Marriage (London: Cower, 1983), p 5.

2. At p1.

3. It could also be argued that Mee's analysis constructs cohabiting women as the ‘problem’ for property law, since the developments over the last 30 years have in part been a response to the difficulty that women have faced in satisfying the requirements of property law.

4. See R Probert ‘Home-sharing - Widening the Debate’ [1999] Fam Law 153.

5. At p 320.

6. Ibid.

7. [1995] 1FLR70.

8. C Harpum, ‘Cohabitation Consultation’ [1995] Fam Law 657.

9. [1972] 1 WLR 1286.

10. At pp 21–22.

11. See p 24, especially fn 107.

12. (1994) 117 DLR (4th) 228, described at p 23.

13. Bums v Burns [1984] Ch 317.

14. At p 148.

15. At p 221.

16. At p 82.

17. At p 39.

18. See the views of Lord Browne-Wilkinson in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340 and Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council [1994] 4 All ER 890. Note also Lowson v Coombes [1999] 2 WLR 720.

19. Midland Bank v Cooke [1995] 4 All ER 562.

20. At p 118.

21. Thus he argues that thejudges in Evesv Eves [1975] 1 WLR 1338 and Grant v Edwards [1986] 1 Ch 638 were not inventing agreements but merely giving effect to the common understanding that beneficial title would be shared: at pp 122–123. Cf S Gardner ‘Rethinking Family Property’ (1993) 109 LQR 263.

22. At p 154.

23. [1897] 1 Ch 196.

24. At p 313.

25. Examples include the New South Wales De Facto Relationships Act 1984, Victoria Property Law (Amendment) Act 1987, Northern Temtory De Facto Relationships Act 1991 and ACT Domestic Relationships Act 1994.