Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T01:51:33.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Andrew Lang, World Trade Law after Neoliberalism: Re-Imagining the Global Economic Order, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011, 385 pp., ISBN 9780199592647, £64.00 (hb), £24.99 (pb).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

Ruben Zandvliet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 1055 - 1059
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ruggie, J. G., ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, (1982) 39 International Organization 379CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 R. N. Gardner, Sterling–Dollar Diplomacy: The Origins and the Prospects of Our International Economic Order (1956/1969).

3 R. Plant, The Neo-liberal State (2012), 6. In the context of the GATT, see K. W. Abbott, ‘The Uruguay Round and Dispute Resolution: Building a Private-Interests System of Justice’, (1992) Columbia Business L Rev 111.

4 K. Polanyi, The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (1944/2001).

5 See generally S. Joseph, Blame It on the WTO? A Human Rights Critique (2011).

6 There have been amendments to the GATT between 1947 and 1994, but these cannot be attributed to the neoliberal turn.

7 Petersmann, E.U., ‘Multilevel Trade Governance in the WTO Requires Multilevel Constitutionalism’, in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.U. (eds.), Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation (2006)Google Scholar, 5 at 6.

8 Howse, R. and Nicolaïdis, K., ‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?’, (2003) 16 Governance 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Petersmann, E.U., Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law (1991)Google Scholar, at xxi, quoted in Nicol, D., The Constitutional Protection of Capitalism (2010), 80Google Scholar.

10 Petersmann, supra note 7, at 43.

11 Ruggie, supra note 1, at 413.

12 Polanyi, supra note 4, at 147.