Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T12:35:55.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Katia Fach Gómez (ed.), EU Policy on International Investment Law / La política de la UE en materia de derecho de las inversiones internacionales, Bosch, 2017, 408 pp., ISBN: 9788494682995.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2018

Luis Miguel Hinojosa Martinez
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Leiden Journal of International Law , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 446 - 449
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 K. Fach Gómez (ed.), EU Policy on International Investment Law / La política de la UE en materia de derecho de las inversiones internacionales (2017), 67.

2 Ibid., at 86–90.

3 Ibid., at 108.

4 This possible incompatibility of the new European ISDS mechanisms with the role of the CJEU is shared by other authors in this book and by the mainstream doctrine in the field. See, for example, Reinisch, A., ‘The EU and ISDS: From Investor-State Arbitration to a Permanent Investment Court’, in de Mestral, A. (ed.), Second Thoughts: Investor State Arbitration between Developed Democracies (2017), 365Google Scholar.

5 Fach Gómez, supra note 1, at 84.

6 For a recent and clarifying study on this issue see Yiannibas, K., ‘Democratizing International Trade and Investment Agreements in the European Union’, in de la Heras, B. Pérez (ed.), Democratic Legitimacy in the European Union and Global Governance (2017), 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 A.-M. de Zayas, Report of the Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order, UN Doc. A/HAC/30/44 (12 July 2016).

8 German Magistrates Association, Opinion on the establishment of an investment tribunal in TTIP, No 04/16, February 2016, available at www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/eu-us_trade_deal/2016/english_version_deutsche_richterbund_opinion_ics_feb2016.pdf.

9 Fach Gómez, supra note 1, at 374.

10 A. Bianchi and A. Peters (eds.), Transparency in International Law (2013), 75–220.

11 Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 16 May 2017 (EU:C:2017:376).