Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:07:59.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sphinctrina tigillaris, an overlooked species of Chaenothecopsis growing on Perenniporia meridionalis, a polypore new to the UK*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2014

David L. HAWKSWORTH ,
Begoña AGUIRRE-HUDSON  and
A. Martyn AINSWORTH
David L. HAWKSWORTH*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28040, Spain; Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK; and Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK. Email: d.hawksworth@nhm.ac.uk
Begoña AGUIRRE-HUDSON
Affiliation:
Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK
A. Martyn AINSWORTH
Affiliation:
Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The original material of Sphinctrina tigillaris, collected in 1864, was relocated, re-examined, found to represent a species of Chaenothecopsis, and is transferred to that genus as C. tigillaris comb. nov. It occurred on a specimen of a polypore, now identified as Perenniporia meridionalis, on a beam in a Northamptonshire church, and does not appear to have been collected since. Perenniporia meridionalis is a predominantly central and southern European species which has not previously been recognized in the British Isles, although other English specimens have now been located in collections at Kew and referred to the related P. medulla-panis. The name Sphinctrina tigillaris had been overlooked since its original description in 1865, and is nomenclaturally distinct from Lichen tigillaris, the basionym of Cyphelium tigillare. Notes on five other calicioid fungi found on polypores, and a key to the six now known, are also included.

Keywords

CaliciumCypheliumfungicolous fungilichensMycocaliciaceaePhaeocalicium
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 46 , Issue 6 , November 2014 , pp. 729 - 735
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, A. M. (2014) The extinct, the extant and the excluded pt 2: a reassessment of fungi published as extinct in England. Field Mycology 15: 53–56.Google Scholar
Berkeley, M. J. & Broome, C. E. (1865 a) XLVII Notices of British fungi. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 3 15: 444–452.Google Scholar
Berkeley, M. J. & Broome, C. E. (1865 b) XXXIV Notices of British fungi. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Series 3 15: 312–322.Google Scholar
Cooke, M. C. (1871) Handbook of British Fungi. Vol. 2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Decock, C. & Stalpers, J. A. (2006) Studies in Perenniporia: Polyporus unitus, Boletus medulla-panis, the nomenclature of Perenniporia, Poria and Physisporus, and a note on European Perenniporia with a resupinate basidiome. Taxon 55: 759–778.Google Scholar
Evans, S., Henrici, A. & Ing, B. (2006) Red Data List of Threatened British Fungi (preliminary assessment). http://www.fieldmycology.net/Download/RDL_of_Threatened_British_Fungi.pdf Google Scholar
Goward, T. (1999) The Lichens of British Columbia. Part 2– Fruticose Species. Victoria, British Columbia: Ministry of Forests Research Programme.Google Scholar
Hawksworth, D. L. (1980) Two little-known members of the Mycocaliciaceae on polypores. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 74: 650–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2014) Guidelines for using the IUCN Red List categories and criteria. Version 11. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf.Google Scholar
Keissler, K. von (1937–38) Coniocarpineae. Dr L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz 9, 1(2): 507–846.Google Scholar
Koskinen, A. (1955) Über die Kryptogamen der Bäume, besonders die Flechten, im Gewssergebiet des Päojänne sowie an den Flüssen Kalajoki, Lestijoko und Pyhäjoko: botanische, soziologische und ökologische Studie I. Helsinki: Mercatorin Kirjapaino.Google Scholar
Löfgren, O. & Tibell, L. (1979) Sphinctrina in Europe. Lichenologist 11: 109–137.Google Scholar
Peck, C. H. (1876) Report of the Botanist. Annual Reports of the New York State Museum of Natural History 28: 31–88.Google Scholar
Rikkinen, J. (1995) What's behind the pretty colours? A study on the photobiology of lichens. Bryobothera 4: 1–239.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. (1970) Anatomisch-taxonomische Untersuchungen an europäischen Arten der Flechtenfamilie Mycocaliciaceae . Mitteilungen der Staatsinstitut für Allgemeine Botanik, Hamburg 13: 111–166.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1971) The genus Cyphelium in Europe. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 65: 138–164.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1975) The Caliciales of boreal North America. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 22(2): 1–128.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1978) The genus Microcalicium . Botaniska Notiser 131: 229–246.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1980) The lichen genus Chaenotheca in the Northern Hemisphere. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 23(1): 1–65.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1981) Comments on Caliciales Exsiccatae II. Lichenologist 13: 51–64.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1989) Caliciales Exsiccatae. Fasc. 7 (Nos 151–175). Thunbergia 8: 1–9.Google Scholar
Tibell, L. (1999) Calicioid lichens and fungi. Nordic Lichen Flora 1: 20–94.Google Scholar
Titov, A. N. (2006) Mikokalizievye Griby (Porjadok Mycocaliciales) Golarktiki. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press.Google Scholar