Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T06:13:29.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Liturgy and Literary Tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2024

Extract

In this paper I want first of all to examine what the liturgy essentially (or rather existentially) is: and then, having made my view of that question clear I want to make some brief suggestions as to how this conception of the liturgy might be grasped by undergraduates taking a combined honours course in theology and English literature. I am going to discuss this particular combination of subjects, partly because it is explicitly mentioned by Laurence Bright in his paper in the symposium, but also because I think it is a combination particularly interesting in itself. What I have to say must not be construed as constituting a syllabus for a course let alone as a substitute for the teaching of the history of liturgical forms and their relation to the theological preoccupations of their periods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1964 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This was the fourth paper read at the Leicester Conference which was described in our last issue.

References

2 cf. Southern, R. W. The Church of the Dark Ages in The Layman in Christian History (S.C.M. 1963), p. 89Google Scholar.

3 Cf. my Culture and Liturgy, pp. 84-85

4 cf. Roger Sharrock: John Bunyan, London 1954. I am indebted to this book for much of this section.