Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T03:28:21.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Air quality in welfare accounting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2022

Almut Balleer*
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen University, Germany Institute for International Economic Studies, Sweden, and CEPR
Morten Endrikat
Affiliation:
RWTH Aachen University, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: balleer@ewifo.rwth-aachen.de. Phone: +49 241 8096154. Fax: +49 241 8092337.

Abstract

We measure how taking into account air quality affects relative welfare levels and welfare convergence across countries. We use the equivalent variation framework by Jones and Klenow [(2016) American Economic Review 106(9), 2426–2457.] which takes into account consumption, life expectancy, inequality, and leisure and extend it with respect to environmental quality in form of air pollution. Our results show that omitting environmental aspects from welfare accounting might lead to both a substantial over- or understatement of actual relative welfare and welfare developments for different (groups of) countries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, P., Keohane, N. and Timmins, C. (2009) Migration and hedonic valuation: The case of air quality. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 58(1), 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2011) The International Handbook of Non-Market Environmental Valuation. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, D., Fender, R., Shore, S. and Wagner, M. (2005) The environmental kuznets curve: Exploring a fresh specification. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy 4(1), 10731073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinda, S. (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics 49(4), 431455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Environment Agency (2012) Particulate Matter from Natural Sources and Related Reporting Under the EU Air Quality Directive in 2008 and 2009. Luxembourg: Publications Office. OCLC, 904337519 Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. and Gaulier, G. (2009) International comparisons of living standards by equivalent incomes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 111(3), 597624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonken, L. K., Xu, X., Weil, Z. M., Chen, G., Sun, Q., Rajagopalan, S. and Nelson, R. J. (2011) Air pollution impairs cognition, provokes depressive-like behaviors and alters hippocampal cytokine expression and morphology. Molecular Psychiatry 16(10), 987995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, R., Liang, W., Song, R. and Timmins, C. (2019) Willingness to pay for clean air in china. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 94(4), 188216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, B. S., Luechinger, S. and Stutzer, A. (2004). Valuing Public Goods: The Life Satisfaction Approach. CESifo Working Papers: No. 1158.Google Scholar
Gradus, R. and Smulders, S. (1993) The trade-off between environmental care and long-term growth - Pollution in three prototype growth models. Journal of Economics 58(1), 2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G. M. and Krueger, A. B. (1995) Economic growth and the environment*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(2), 353377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. and Oliva, P. (2015) The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City. Journal of Public Economics 122(Suppl. 1), 6879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ito, K. and Zhang, S. (2020) Willingness to pay for clean air: Evidence from air purifier markets in china. Journal of Political Economy 128(5), 16271672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. I. and Klenow, P. J. (2016) Beyond GDP? Welfare across countries and time. American Economic Review 106(9), 24262457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, A. (2012) Valuing public goods using happiness data: The case of air quality. Journal of Public Economics 96(9-10), 869880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, J. B. (2018) Health-led growth since 1800. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22(4), 9611000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maoz, Y. D. (2010) Labor hours in the United States and Europe: The role of different leisure preferences. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14(2), 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H. and Club of Rome (1972) The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
Michel, P. and Rotillon, G. (1995) Disutility of pollution and endogenous growth. Environmental and Resource Economics 6(3), 279300.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, A. and Agrawal, M. (2018) A Global Perspective of Fine Particulate Matter Pollution and Its Health Effects. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 551.Google ScholarPubMed
Palivos, T. and Varvarigos, D. (2017) Pollution abatement as a source of stabilization and long-run growth. Macroeconomic Dynamics 21(3), 644676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trabandt, M. and Uhlig, H. (2011) The Laffer curve revisited. Journal of Monetary Economics 58(4), 305327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viscusi, W. K. and Aldy, J. E. (2003) The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27(1), 576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsch, H. (2006) Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data. Ecological Economics 58(4), 801813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weuve, J. (2012) Exposure to particulate air pollution and cognitive decline in older women. Archives of Internal Medicine 172(3), 219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank (2018. World development indicators 2018. Technical report, Washington DC.Google Scholar
World Bank Group. (1997). Expanding the measure of wealth: Indicators of environmentally sustainable development. Technical report.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (2006). WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide - Global update 2005. Technical report.Google Scholar