Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T16:16:18.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NOTE ON UNCERTAINTY IN SAVINGS DECISIONS: CAN A NAÏVE STRATEGY BE OPTIMAL?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2013

Fábio Augusto Reis Gomes
Fábio Augusto Reis Gomes*
Affiliation:
Fucape Business School
*
Address correspondence to: Fábio Augusto Reis Gomes, Fucape Business School, Av. Fernando Ferrari, 1358, Boa Vista, Vitória-ES CEP 29075-505, Brazil; e-mail: fabiogomes@fucape.br.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyzes the process of decision-making on consumption in a two-period consumption setting, assuming the return on savings is uncertain in the sense of Knight [Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin (1921)]. The results imply that a naïve strategy to save zero is optimal for a continuum of income values. Under the Permanent Income Hypothesis, consumption equals current income only when current income is equal to permanent income. Indeed Campbell and Mankiw [in Olivier Blanchard and Stanley Fischer (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 185–214. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1989)] assumed that consumers who spend their total income are only following a simple rule of thumb. However, the naïve strategy obtained casts doubt on their interpretation.

Keywords

ConsumptionSavingsUncertaintyRule-of-Thumb Behavior
Type
Note
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , September 2014 , pp. 1428 - 1435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angeletos, George-Marios, Laibson, David, Repetto, Andrea, Tobacman, Jeremy, and Weinberg, Stephen (2001) The hyperbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15, 47–68.Google Scholar
Brady, Ryan R. (2008) Structural breaks and consumer credit: Is consumption smoothing finally a reality. Journal of Macroeconomics 30, 1246–1268.Google Scholar
Campbell, John Y. (1987) Does saving anticipate declining labor income? An alternative test of the permanent income hypothesis. Econometrica 55, 1249–1273.Google Scholar
Campbell, John Y. and Mankiw, N. Gregory (1989) Consumption, income and interest rates: Reinterpreting the time series evidence. In Blanchard, Olivier and Fischer, Stanley (eds.), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, pp. 185–214. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. and Mankiw, G. (1990) Permanent income, current income, and consumption. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 83, 265–280.Google Scholar
Carrol, Christopher D. (1997) Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1–55.Google Scholar
Chen, Zengjing and Epstein, Larry (2002) Ambiguity, risk, and asset returns in continuous time. Econometrica 70, 1403–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dow, James and Werlang, Sérgio (1992) Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of portfolio. Econometrica 60, 197–204.Google Scholar
Epstein, Larry G. and Tan Wang (1994) Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty. Econometrica 62, 283–322.Google Scholar
Flavin, Marjorie (1981) The adjustment of consumption to changing expectations about future income. Journal of Political Economy 89, 974–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1957) A Theory of the Consumption Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilboa, Itzhak and Schmeidler, David (1989) Maxmin expected utility with a non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18, 141–153.Google Scholar
Gomes, Fábio (2008) The effect of future income uncertainty in savings decision. Economics Letters 98, 269–274.Google Scholar
Ju, Nengjiu and Miao, Jianjun (2012) Ambiguity, learning, and asset returns. Econometrica 80, 559–591.Google Scholar
Klibanoff, Peter, Marinacci, Massimo, and Mukerji, Sujoy (2005) A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica 73, 1849–1892.Google Scholar
Knight, Frank (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Manski, Charles F. (2004) Measuring expectations. Econometrica 72, 1329–1376.Google Scholar
Miao, Jianjun (2004) A note on consumption and savings under Knightian uncertainty. Annals of Economics and Finance 5, 299–311.Google Scholar
Sarantis, Nicholas and Stewart, Chris (2003) Liquidity constraints, precautionary saving and aggregate consumption: An international comparison. Economic Modelling 20, 1151–1173.Google Scholar
Simonsen, Mario H. and Werlang, Sergio (1991) Subjective probabilities and portfolio inertia. Brazilian Review of Econometrics 11, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidyanathan, Ghetta (1993) Consumption, liquidity constraints and economic development. Journal of Macroeconomics 15, 591–610.Google Scholar