Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:35:49.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of public sector employment on household savings and labor supply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2023

Luis G. Bettoni
Affiliation:
Insper, São Paulo, Brazil
Marcelo R. Santos*
Affiliation:
Insper, São Paulo, Brazil University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
*
Corresponding author: Marcelo R. Santos; Email: marcelors2@insper.edu.br

Abstract

In many countries, the structure of wages and the labor law legislation are completely different for public and private sector employees. In this paper, we develop a general equilibrium overlapping generations model to study the effect of such differences on household savings and labor supply. To conduct our analysis, first we use microdata from two Brazilian household surveys to document that civil servants save and work significantly less than their counterparts in the private sector. Second, we use matched employer–employee microdata from Brazil (RAIS) to document differences between the two sectors in terms of wage and unemployment risk. Then, we calibrate the model to be consistent with micro and macro evidence for Brazil. Our counterfactual exercises show that differences in wages characteristics and labor law legislation account for nearly 70% of the gap in savings between civil servants and private sector workers, and 57% of the gap in labor supply. In addition, we find that eliminating those differences can produce sizable increase on aggregate savings, employment, and welfare.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fajardo, J., Ornelas, J. and Farias, A. (2012) Estimating risk aversion, risk-neutral and real-world densities using brazilian real currency options. Economia Aplicada 16(4), 567577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afonso, L. E. (2016) Progressividade e aspectos distributivos na previdência social: Uma análise com o emprego dos microdados dos registros administrativos do RGPS. Revista Brasileira de Economia 70, 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aiyagari, S. R. (1994) Uninsured idiosyncratic risk and aggregate saving. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109(3), 659684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alb, recht, J., Robayo-Abril, M. and Vroman, S. (2019) Public-sector employment in an equilibrium search and matching model. The Economic Journal 129(617), 3561.Google Scholar
Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. and Taber, C. R. (2005) Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy 113(1), 151184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreoni, J. (1989) Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97(6), 14471458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attanasio, O. P. (1999) Consumption. Handbook of Macroeconomics 1, 741812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R. (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. Journal of Political Economy 98(5, Part 2), S103S125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, R., Pistaferri, L. and Preston, I. (2008) Consumption inequality and partial insurance. American Economic Review 98(5), 18871921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, J., Postel-Vinay, F. and Turon, H. (2017) Public sector wage policy and labor market equilibrium: A structural model. Journal of the European Economic Association 15(6), 12141257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, M., Hansen, L. and Heckman, J. (1999) Micro data and general equilibrium models. In: J. B Taylor and M. Woodford (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics. Google Scholar
Burdett, K. (2012) Towards a theory of the labor market with a public sector. Labour Economics 19(1), 6875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdett, K. and Mortensen, D. T. (1998) Wage differentials, employer size, and unemployment. International Economic Review 39(2), 257273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavalcanti, T. and Santos, M. (2020) (MIS) allocation effects of an overpaid public sector. Journal of the European Economic Association, Technical report.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chassamboulli, A. and Gomes, P. (2023) Public-sector employment, wages and education decisions. Labour Economics 82, 102345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, A. (2022) Insurance cyclicality. Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. and Postel-Vinay, F. (2009) Job security and job protection. Oxford Economic Papers 61(2), 207239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conesa, J., Kitao, S. and Krueger, D. (2009) Taxing capital? Not a bad idea after all!. American Economic Review 99(1), 2548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Nardi, M. (2004) Wealth inequality and intergenerational links. Review of Economic Studies 71(3), 743768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domeij, D. and Floden, J. (2004) On the distributional effects of reducing capital taxes. International Economic Review 45(2), 523554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flodén, M. (2006) Labour supply and saving under uncertainty. Economic Journal 116(513), 721737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandelman, N. and Hernández-Murillo, R. (2014) Risk aversion at the country level. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis WPS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garibaldi, P., Gomes, P. and Sopraseuth, T. (2021) Public employment redux. Journal of Government and Economics 1, 100003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giordano, R. e. a., Depalo, D., Pereira, M. C., Eugène, B., Papapetrou, E., Perez, J. J., Reiss, L. and Roter, M. (2015) The public sector pay gap in a selection of euro area countries. Review of Public Economics.Google Scholar
Glomm, G., Jung, J. and Tran, C. (2009) Macroeconomic implications of early retirement in the public sector: The case of brazil. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33(4), 777797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollin, D. (2002) Getting income shares right. Journal of Political Economy 110(2), 458474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, P. (2015) Optimal public sector wages. The Economic Journal 125(587), 14251451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, P. (2018) Heterogeneity and the public sector wage policy. International Economic Review 59(3), 14691489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, V., Bugarin, M. and Ellery-Jr, R. (2005) Long-run implications of the brazilian capital stock and income estimates. Brazilian Review of Econometrics 25(1), 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, P. and Kuehn, Z. (2019) You’re the one that i want! public employment and women’s labor market outcomes. IZA Discussion Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, P. and Wellschmied, F. (2019) Public-sector employment over the life cycle. IZA Working Paper.Google Scholar
Guvenen, F. (2009) An empirical investigation of labor income processes. Review of Economic Dynamics 12(1), 5879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guvenen, F., Karahan, F., Ozkan, S. and Song, J. (2021) What do data on millions of us workers reveal about lifecycle earnings dynamics? Econometrica 89(5), 23032339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guvenen, F., Ozkan, S. and Song, J. (2014) The nature of countercyclical income risk. Journal of Political Economy 122(3), 621660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, H., Huang, F., Liu, Z. and Zhu, D. (2018) Breaking the iron rice bowl: Evidence of precautionary savings from the chinese state-owned enterprises reform. Journal of Monetary Economics 94, 94113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1), 153161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heston, A., Summers, R. and Aten, B. (2012) Penn World Table version 7.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP).Google Scholar
Huggett, M., Ventura, G. and Yaron, A. (2006) Human capital and earnings distribution dynamics. Journal of Monetary Economics 53(2), 265290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulten, C. (1996) Infrastructure capital and economic growth: How well you use it may be more important then how much you have. NBER Working Paper 5847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörner, J., Ngai, L. R. and Olivetti, C. (2007) Public enterprises and labor market performance. International Economic Review 48(2), 363384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jappelli, T. and Pistaferri, L. (2010) The consumption response to income changes. Annual Review of Economics 2(1), 479506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, G. and Violante, G. L. (2010) How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 2(4), 5387.Google Scholar
Low, H., Meghir, C. and Pistaferri, L. (2010) Wage risk and employment risk over the life cycle. American Economic Review 100(4), 14321467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michaillat, P. (2014) A theory of countercyclical government multiplier. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 6(1), 190217.Google Scholar
Mizala, A., Romaguera, P. and Gallegos, S. (2011) Public-private wae gap in latin amerc (1992-2007): A matching approach. Labour Economics 18, 115131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mroz, T. A. (1987) The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica 55(4), 765799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2020) Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.Google Scholar
Paes, N. L. and Bugarin, M. N. S. (2006) Parâmetros tributários da economia brasileira. Estudos Econômicos 36(4), 699720.Google Scholar
Parente, S. L. and Prescott, E. C. (2000) Barriers to Riches. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peterman, W. and Sager, E. (2022) Optimal public debt with life cycle motives. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 14(4), 404437.Google Scholar
Pijoan-Mas, J. (2006) Precautionary savings or working longer hours? Review of Economic Dynamics 9(2), 326352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrini, V. and Trigari, A. (2007) Public employment and the business cycle. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109(4), 723742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tauchen, G. (1986) Finite-state markov chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregressions. Economics Letters 20(2), 177181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vella, F. (1998) Estimating models with sample selection bias: A survey. journal of human resources. Journal of Human Resources 33(1), 127169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. (1995) The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 641680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar