Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T18:35:56.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LIMITED ASSET MARKET PARTICIPATION AND DETERMINACY IN THE OPEN ECONOMY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2017

Edward F. Buffie  and
Luis-Felipe Zanna
Edward F. Buffie*
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Luis-Felipe Zanna
Affiliation:
International Monetary Fund
*
Address correspondence to: Edward F. Buffie, Indiana University, 2414 East Rock Creek Drive, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA; e-mail: ebuffie@indiana.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The perception that inflation targeting (IT) runs a high risk of indeterminacy when a significant share of households are too poor to save is an artifact of the closed economy. In the open economy, the Taylor principle is generally valid for both contemporaneous and forward-looking IT. Active policy in contemporaneous IT guarantees determinacy, eccentric cases aside. In forward-looking IT, the scope for active policy is constrained by an upper bound on the Taylor coefficient. The upper bound is insensitive, however, to the share of poor, nonsaving households. Moreover, it can be increased substantially–to a level that does not bind–through reserve sales/purchases that limit exchange rate volatility.

Keywords

Unflation TargetingExchange RateIndeterminacyAsset Market ParticipationTaylor Principle
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 22 , Issue 8 , December 2018 , pp. 1937 - 1977
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agenor, R. and Montiel, P. (1999) Development Macroeconomics, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alapanda, S., Kotze, K., and Woglom, G. (2010) The role of the exchange rate in a New Keynesian DSGE model for the South African economy. South African Journal of Economics 78, 170–191.Google Scholar
Alonso-Carrera, J. and Kam, T. (2016) Anatomizing incomplete markets small open economies: Policy tradeoffs and equilibrium determinacy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 20, 1022–1050.Google Scholar
Alvarez, F., Atkeson, A., and Kehoe, P. (2002) Money, interest rates, and exchange rates with endogenously segmented markets. Journal of Political Economy 110, 73–112.Google Scholar
An, S. and Kang, H. (2009) Oil shocks in a DSGE model for the Korean economy. In Ito, T. and Rose, A. (eds.), Commodity Prices and Markets, East Asia Seminar on Economics, vol. 20, pp. 295–321. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arceo Gomez, E. and Vasquez, R. Campos (2009) Female Labor Supply in Mexico, 1990–2000. Mimeo, Centro de Investigacion y Docencias Economicas.Google Scholar
Ascari, G., Colciago, A., and Rossi, L. (2011) Limited Asset Market Participation: Does it Really Matter for Monetary Policy? Bank of Finland discussion paper no. 15/2011.Google Scholar
Bilbiie, F. (2008) Limited asset markets participation, monetary policy and (inverted) aggregate demand logic. Journal of Economic Theory 140, 162–196.Google Scholar
Binyamini, A. (2007) Small open economy New Keynesian Phillips curve: Derivation and application to Israel. Israel Economic Review 5, 67–92.Google Scholar
Boerma, J. (2014) Openness and the (Inverted) Aggregate Demand Logic. DNB (De Nederlandsche Bank) working paper no. 436.Google Scholar
Briguglio, L. (1998) Small country and returns to scale in manufacturing. World Development 26, 507–515.Google Scholar
Buffie, E. (2013) The Taylor principle fights back, part I. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37, 2771–2795.Google Scholar
Buffie, E. (2014) The Taylor principle fights back, part II. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 46, 30–49.Google Scholar
Bullard, J. and Mitra, K. (2002) Learning about monetary policy rules. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1105–1129.Google Scholar
Calvo, G. (1983) Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework. Journal of Monetary Economics 12, 983–998.Google Scholar
Caputo, R., Liendo, F., and Medina, J. (2007) New Keynesian models for Chile in the inflation-targeting period. Series on Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies, vol. 11. Santiago: Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar
Card, D. (1994) Intertemporal labor supply: An assessment. In Sims, C. (ed.), Advances in Econometrics, pp. 49–78. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Castillo, P., Montoro, C., and Tuesta, V. (2006) An Estimated Stochastic General Equilibrium Model with Partial Dollarization: A Bayesian Approach. Mimeo, Central Bank of Peru.Google Scholar
Catao, L. and Pagan, A. (2010) The Credit Channel and Monetary Transmisson in Brazil and Chile: A Structured VAR Approach. NCER working paper series no. 53/2010, National Centre for Economic Research.Google Scholar
Cebi, C. (2012) The interaction between monetary and fiscal policies in Turkey: An estimated New Keynesian DSGE model. Economic Modelling 29, 1258–1267.Google Scholar
Cespedes, L., Ochoa, M., and Soto, C. (2005) The New Keynesian Phillips Curve in an Emerging Market Economy: The Case of Chile. Working paper no. 355, Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar
Chang, C., Liu, Z., and Spiegel, M. (2013) Capital Controls and Optimal Chinese Monetary Policy. Working paper no. 2012-13, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.Google Scholar
Choudhary, A., Naeem, S., Faheem, A., Nadeem, H., and Pasha, F. (2011) Formal Sector Price Discoveries: Preliminary Results from a Developing Country. SBP (State Bank of Pakistan) working paper series no. 42.Google Scholar
Chyi, Y. and Huang, C. (1997) An empirical study of the ‘Rule of Thumb’ consumption model in five east Asian countries. Applied Economics 29, 1271–1282.Google Scholar
Colciago, A. (2011) Rule of thumb consumers meet sticky wages. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 43, 325–353.Google Scholar
de Castro, M., Gouvea, S., Minella, A., Santos, R., and Souza-Sobrinho, N. (2011) SAMBA: Stochastic Analytical Model with a Bayesian Approach. Working paper series no. 239, Central Bank of Brazil.Google Scholar
De Fiore, F. and Liu, Z. (2005) Does trade openness matter for aggregate instability? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 29, 1165–1192.Google Scholar
De Gregorio, J., Edwards, S., and Valdes, R. (2000) Controls on capital inflows: Do they work? Journal of Development Economics 63, 59–83.Google Scholar
Del Negro, M. and Schorfheide, F. (2008) Inflation Dynamics in a Small Open Economy Model Under Inflation Targeting: Some Evidence from Chile. Staff report 329, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. and Papageorgiou, C. (2000) A cross-country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification. Journal of Economic Growth 5, 87–120.Google Scholar
Elekdag, S., Justiniano, A., and Tchakarov, I. (2005) An Estimated Small Open Economy Model of the Financial Accelerator. IMF working paper no. 05/44.Google Scholar
Fedelino, A. and Kudina, A. (2003) Fiscal Sustainability in African HIPC Countries: A Policy Dilemma? IMF working paper no. 03/187.Google Scholar
Gali, J., Lopez-Salido, J., and Valles, J. (2004) Rule-of-thumb consumers and the design of interest rate rules. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 36, 739–764.Google Scholar
Gali, J. and Monacelli, T. (2005) Monetary policy and exchange rate volatility in a small open economy. Review of Economic Studies 72, 707–734.Google Scholar
Garcia-Cicco, J. (2010) Estimating Models for Monetary Policy Analysis in Emerging Countries. Working paper no. 561, Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar
Garcia-Cicco, J., Pancrazi, R., and Uribe, M. (2010) Real business cycles in emerging countries? American Economic Review 100, 2510–2531.Google Scholar
Gong, X. and van Soest, A. (1997) Family Structure and Female Labour Supply in Mexico City. Mimeo, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Gouvea, S. (2007) Price Rigidity in Brazil: Evidence from Micro Data. Working paper no. 143, Central Bank of Brazil.Google Scholar
Gupta, R. and Steinbach, R. (2013) A DSGE-VAR model for forecasting key South African macroeconomic variables. Economic Modelling 33, 19–33.Google Scholar
Hamann, F., Perez, J., and Rodriguez, D. (2006) Bringing A DSGE Model into Policy Environment in Colombia. Mimeo, Banco de la Republica, Bogota.Google Scholar
Khan, A. and Thomas, J. (2015) Revisiting the tale of two interest rates with endogenous asset market segmentation. Review of Economic Dynamics 18, 243–268.Google Scholar
Kirsanova, T., Leith, C., and Wren-Lewis, S. (2006) Should central banks target consumer prices or the exchange rate? Economic Journal 116, F208–F231.Google Scholar
Linnemann, L. and Schabert, A. (2006) Monetary policy and the Taylor principle in open economies. International Finance 9, 343–367.Google Scholar
Ljubaj, I. (2010) Capital Inflows and Efficiency of Sterilisation – Estimation of Sterilisation and Offset Coefficients. Mimeo, Croatian National Bank.Google Scholar
Llosa, L. and Tuesta, V. (2008) Determinacy and learnability of monetary policy rules in small open economies. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40, 1033–1063.Google Scholar
Lopez, H., Schmidt-Hebel, K., and Serven, L. (2000) How effective is fiscal policy in raising national saving? Review of Economics and Statistics 82, 226–238.Google Scholar
Mallick, D. (2012) The role of the elasticity of substitution in economic growth: A cross-country investigation. Labour Economics 19, 682–694.Google Scholar
McCallum, B. (1999) Issues in the design of monetary policy rules. In Taylor, J. and Woodford, M. (eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics, Vol. 1c, pp. 1341–1397. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Medina, J. and Soto, C. (2007) The Chilean Business Cycles through the Lens of a Stochastic General Equilibrium Model. Mimeo, Central Bank of Chile.Google Scholar
Min, H. (2007) Estimation of labor demand elasticity for the RMSM-LP: Revised minimum standard model for labor and poverty module. International Business and Economics Research Journal 6, 29–34.Google Scholar
Minella, A. and Souza-Sobrinho, N. (2013) Monetary policy channels in Brazil through the lens of a semi-structural model. Economic Modelling 30, 405–419.Google Scholar
Newman, J. and Gertler, P. (1994) Family productivity, labor supply, and welfare in a low income country. Journal of Human Resources 29 (special issue), 989–1026.Google Scholar
Oberfield, E. and Raval, D. (2014) Micro Data and Macro Technology. Mimeo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Ogaki, M., Ostry, J., and Reinhart, C. (1996) Saving Behavior in Low- and Middle-Income Developing Countries. IMF Staff papers 43, 38–71.Google Scholar
Pontual-Ribeiro, E. (2001) Asymmetric labor supply. Empirical Economics 26, 183–197.Google Scholar
Pradhan, M. and van Soest, A. (1997) Household labor supply in urban areas of Bolivia. Review of Economics and Statistics 79, 300–310.Google Scholar
Tovar, C. (2006a) An Analysis of Devaluations and Output Dynamics in Latin America Using an Estimated DSGE Model. Mimeo, Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Tovar, C. (2006b) Devaluations, Output, and the Balance Sheet Effect: A Structural Econometric Analysis. Mimeo, Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Vavra, D. (2014) Inflation Targeting and Foreign Exchange Intervention in Emerging Markets. Mimeo, Ceska Narodni Banka.Google Scholar
Yun, T. (1996) Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cycles. Journal of Monetary Economics 37, 345–370.Google Scholar
Zanna, L. (2003) Interest Rate Rules and Multiple Equilibria in the Small Open Economy. International Finance discussion paper no.785, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.Google Scholar
Zheng, T. and Guo, H. (2013) Estimating a small open economy DSGE model with indeterminacy: Evidence from China. Economic Modelling 31, 642–652.Google Scholar