Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T11:32:39.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

MONETARY POLICY, INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT: IN DEFENSE OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2012

Nicolas Groshenny*
Affiliation:
Reserve Bank of New Zealand and CAMA
*
Address correspondence to: Nicolas Groshenny, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Economics Department, Research Team, 2 The Terrace, 6011 Wellington, New Zealand; e-mail: nicolas.groshenny@rbnz.govt.nz.

Abstract

To what extent did deviations from the Taylor rule between 2002 and 2006 help to promote price stability and maximum sustainable employment? To address that question, I estimate a New Keynesian model with unemployment and perform a counterfactual experiment where monetary policy strictly follows a Taylor rule over the period 2002:Q1–2006:Q4. I find that such a policy would have generated a sizeable increase in unemployment and resulted in an undesirably low rate of inflation. Around mid-2004, when the counterfactual deviates the most from the actual series, the model indicates that the probability of an unemployment rate greater than 8% would have been as high as 80%, whereas the probability of an inflation rate above 1% would have been close to zero.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arsenau, David and Chugh, Sanjay (2008) Optimal fiscal and monetary policy with costly wage bargaining. Journal of Monetary Economics 55, 14011414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernanke, Ben (2002) Deflation: Making Sure It Does Not Happen Here. Remarks before the National Economists Club, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bernanke, Ben (2010) Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble. Speech at the Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Chari, V.V., Kehoe, Patrick, and McGrattan, Ellen (2009) New Keynesian models: Not yet useful for policy analysis. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 1 (1), 242266.Google Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence, Eichenbaum, Martin, and Evans, Charles (2005) Nominal rigidities and the dynamics effects of a shock to monetary policy. Journal of Political Economy 113 (1), 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dokko, Jane, Doyle, Brian M., Kiley, Michael T., Kim, Jinill, Sherlund, Shane, Sim, Jae, and Van Den Heuvel, Skander (2011) Monetary policy and the global housing bubble. Economic Policy 26 (66), 237287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggertsson, Gauti and Woodford, Michael (2003) The zero bound on interest rates and optimal monetary policy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 34 (1), 139235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gertler, Mark, Sala, Luca, and Trigari, Antonella (2008) An estimated monetary DSGE model with unemployment and staggered nominal wage bargaining. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40 (8), 17131764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groshenny, Nicolas (2009) Evaluating a Monetary Business Cycle Model with Unemployment for the Euro Area. Working paper 173, National Bank of Belgium.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groshenny, Nicolas (2010) Monetary Policy, Inflation and Unemployment: In Defense of the Federal Reserve. CAMA Working Paper 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert (2005) Job loss, job finding, and unemployment in the U.S. economy over the past fifty years. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 101–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, Peter (2007) Changes in the Federal Reserve' s inflation target: Causes and consequences. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39 (8), 18511882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Don (2007) John Taylor Rules. Speech at the Conference on John Taylor' s Contributions to Monetary Theory and Policy, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.Google Scholar
Krause, Michael and Lubik, Thomas (2007) The (ir)relevance of real wage rigidity in the New Keynesian model with search frictions. Journal of Monetary Economics 54 (3), 706727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pissarides, Christopher (2000) Equilibrium Unemployment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Primiceri, Giorgio, Schaumburg, Ernst, and Tambalotti, Andrea (2006) Intertemporal Disturbances. NBER Working Paper 12243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotemberg, Julio and Woodford, Michael (1995) Dynamic general equilibrium models with imperfectly competitive product markets. In Cooley, Thomas F. (ed.), Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, pp. 243293. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sala, Luca, Söderström, Ulf, and Trigari, Antonella (2008) Monetary policy under uncertainty in an estimated model with labor market frictions. Journal of Monetary Economics 55 (5), 9831006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimer, Robert (2005) The cyclical behavior of equilibrium unemployment and vacancies: Evidence and theory. American Economic Review 95 (1), 2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smets, Frank and Wouters, Rafael (2007) Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. American Economic Review 97 (3), 586606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, Lars E. O. (2010) Inflation targeting. In Friedman, Benjamin and Woodford, Michael (eds.), Handbook of Monetary Economics, 3B, pp.12371302. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Taylor, John B. (1993) Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie–Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John B. (2007) Housing and monetary policy. NBER Working Paper 13682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trigari, Antonella (2009) Equilibrium unemployment, job flows and inflation dynamics. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41 (1), 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Carl (2005) Labor market search, sticky prices and interest rate rules. Review of Economic Dynamics 8, 829849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar