Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T01:03:13.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A NEW MEASURE TO QUANTIFY HYSTERESIS LOSSES: THE CASE OF ITALIAN WINE EXPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2018

Jolita Adamonis  and
Laura M. Werner
Jolita Adamonis*
Affiliation:
University of Giessen
Laura M. Werner
Affiliation:
University of Giessen
*
Address correspondence to: Jolita Adamonis, University of Giessen, Department of Economics – VWL IV, Licher Str. 62, 35394 Gießen, Germany; e-mail: Jolita.Adamonis@wirtschaft.uni-giessen.de
Get access
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper introduces a new measure to capture dynamic losses for exporting firms on markets that exhibit hysteresis on the supply side. Our indicator aims to quantify dynamic losses caused by sunk adjustment costs in case of exchange rate fluctuations. While the standard procedure in welfare analysis is to compare two equilibria, we focus on welfare effects that take place during dynamics. We analyze negative dynamic effects on producers' income that are generated due to writing off sunk adjustment costs. As an example, we investigate Italian wine exports to the United States over the period 1995–2013. After testing for hysteresis on the market, we present the indicator of hysteresis losses. It captures a continuous increase of dynamic losses during the period 2003–2008. Moreover, over-proportionately large hysteresis losses are generated in comparison to the exchange rate changes if the pain threshold of the exchange rate (ca. 1.25$/€) is passed.

Keywords

Dynamic Welfare LossesPlay-HysteresisAdjustment CostsExchange Rate Effects
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 23 , Issue 7 , October 2019 , pp. 2787 - 2814
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was written as part of the German Research Foundation (DFG) project “Was erklärt den Agraraußenhandel der EU und Deutschlands? Theoretische und ökonometrische Untersuchungen zu Liberalisierung, Makroeffekten und Hysterese.”

References

REFERENCES

Adamonis, Jolita (2018) Sunk Cost Hysteresis and Hysteresis Losses. Ph.D. Thesis, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen.Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno, Henry, Jérôme, Lordon, Frédéric, and Topol, Richard (1991) Strong hysteresis: An application to foreign trade. OFCE working paper 9103.Google Scholar
Amable, Bruno, Henry, Jérôme, Lordon, Frédéric, and Topol, Richard (1992) Hysteresis: What it is and what it is not. OFCE working paper 9216.Google Scholar
Anderson, Kym and Nelge, Signe (2011) Global Wine Markets, 1961 to 2009: A Statistical Compendium. Adelaide, SA: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Krugman, Paul (1989) Persistent trade effects of large exchange rate shocks. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 635–654.10.2307/2937860Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (1989) Sunk-Cost Hysteresis. NBER working paper 2911.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (1990) Hysteresis in trade. Empirical Economics 15, 127–142.10.1007/BF01973449Google Scholar
Beliveau, Barbara C. and Rouse, Elizabeth M. (2010) Prohibition and repeal: A short history of the wine industry's regulation in the United States. Journal of Wine Economics 5, 53–68.10.1017/S1931436100001371Google Scholar
Belke, Ansgar and Göcke, Matthias (1999) A simple model of hysteresis in employment under uncertainty. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 46 (3), 260–286.10.1111/1467-9485.00132Google Scholar
Belke, Ansgar and Matthias, Göcke (2001) Exchange rate uncertainty and employment: An algorithm describing “play”. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 17, 181–204.10.1002/asmb.436Google Scholar
Belke, Ansgar, Göcke, Matthias, and Werner, Laura (2014) Hysteresis effects in economics - different methods for describing economic path-dependence. In Dias, Jose Carlos (ed.), Hysteresis - Types, Applications, and Behavior Patterns in Complex Systems, pp. 19–42. New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Belke, Ansgar, Göcke, Matthias, and Günther, Martin (2013) Exchange rate bands of inaction and play-hysteresis in German exports - sectoral evidence for some OECD destinations. Metroeconomica 64 (1), 152–179.10.1111/meca.12000Google Scholar
Borgersen, Trond-Arne and Göcke, Matthias (2007) Exchange rate overshooting and path-dependence in international trade. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 295–317.Google Scholar
Canova, Fabio and De Nicolo, Gianni (1995) Stock returns and real activity: A structural approach. European Economic Review 39 (5), 981–1015.10.1016/0014-2921(95)00017-8Google Scholar
Cross, Rod (1993) On the foundations of hysteresis in economic systems. Economics and Philosophy 9, 53–74.10.1017/S0266267100005113Google Scholar
Cross, Rod, McNamara, Hugh, Pokrovskii, Alexei, and Kalachev, Leonid V. (2010) Hysteresis in the Fundamentals of Macroeconomics. University of Strathclyde discussion paper 1008.Google Scholar
Cross, Rod, Grinfeld, Michael, and Lamba, Harbir (2009) Hysteresis and economics. Control Systems Magazine 29, 30–43.Google Scholar
De Prince, Diogo and Kannebley, Sérgio Jr (2013) Strong hysteresis in Brazilian imports: A panel cointegration approach. Journal of Economic Studies 40 (4), 528–548.10.1108/JES-01-2011-0010Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash (1990) Hysteresis, import penetration and exchange rate pass-through. Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (2), 205–228.10.2307/2937845Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash (1992) Investment and hysteresis. Journal of Economic Perspectives 6 (1), 107–132.10.1257/jep.6.1.107Google Scholar
Dixit, Avinash and Pindyck, Robert S. (1994) Investment under uncertainty. New York: Princeton Unversity Press.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2015a) GDP and main components. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/data/database.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2015b) International trade in goods – detailed data (detail). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/de/data/database.Google Scholar
Fedoseeva, Svetlana (2014) Are agricultural exports any special? Exchange rate non-linearities in European exports to the US. German Journal of Agricultural Economics 63, 259–270.Google Scholar
Fertö, Imre and Jeremiás, M. Balogh (2016) Are the major European Wine Exporters Able to Price Discriminate Across Their EU Extra Wine Export Destinations? KTI/IE discussion paper 2016/24.Google Scholar
Göcke, Matthias (2001) A macroeconomic model with hysteresis in foreign trade. Metroeconomica 52 (4), 449–473.10.1111/1467-999X.00129Google Scholar
Göcke, Matthias (2002) Various concepts of hysteresis applied in economics. Journal of Economic Surveys 16 (2), 167–188.10.1111/1467-6419.00163Google Scholar
Göcke, Matthias and Matulaityte, Jolita (2015) Modelling Economic Hysteresis Losses Caused by Sunk Adjustments Costs. MAGKS – Joint discussion paper series in Economics by the Universities of Aachen, Gießen, Göttingen, Kassel, Marburg & Siegen 36-2015.Google Scholar
Gusti d'Italia (2016) Italian wine export to the United States, first in the world. Available at: http://www.gustiditalia.com/1752/news/italian-wine-export-to-the-united-states-first-in-the-world.Google Scholar
Hallett, Hughes A. J. and Piscitelli, Laura (2002) Testing for hysteresis against nonlinear alternatives. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control 27, 303–327.10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00051-3Google Scholar
IWC (2016) Italian wine central. Available at: http://italianwinecentral.com/italian-wine-exports-by-destination.Google Scholar
Kannebley, Sergio Jr. (2008) Tests for the hysteresis hypothesis in Brazilian industrialized exports: A threshold cointegration analysis. Economic Modelling 25, 171–190.10.1016/j.econmod.2007.04.011Google Scholar
Krasnosel'skii, Mark A. and Pokrovskii, Aleksei V. (1989) Systems with Hysteresis. Berlin: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-61302-9Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul (1986) Pricing to market when exchange rate changes. In Arndt, Sven W. and Richardson, David J. (eds.), Real Financial Linkages Among Open Economies. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mariani, Angela, Pomarici, Eugenio, and Boatto, Vasco (2012) The international wine trade: Recent trends and critical issues. Wine Economics and Policy 1, 24–40.10.1016/j.wep.2012.10.001Google Scholar
Mayergoyz, Isaak D. (1986) Mathematical models of hysteresis. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 5, 603–608.10.1109/TMAG.1986.1064347Google Scholar
Mayergoyz, Isaak D. (2003) Mathematical Models of Hysteresis and Their Applications, 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
Mayergoyz, Isaak D. (2006) Scalar Preisach models of hysteresis. In Bertotti, Giorgio and Mayergoyz, Isaak D. (eds.), The Science of Hysteresis, pp. 293–446. Burlington: Elsevier Inc.10.1016/B978-012480874-4/50006-3Google Scholar
Mota, Paulo R. and Vasconcelos, Paulo B. (2012) Nonconvex adjustment costs, hysteresis and the microdynamics of employment. Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 35 (1), 93–112.10.2753/PKE0160-3477350106Google Scholar
Mota, Paulo R., Varejão, José, and Vasconcelos, Paulo B. (2012) Hysteresis in the dynamics of employment. Metroeconomica 63 (4), 661–692.10.1111/j.1467-999X.2012.04159.xGoogle Scholar
OIV (2014) Weltkonjunkturbericht March 2014 of the international organisation of vine and wine. Available at: http://www.infovin.org/content/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Konjunkturnote-OIV-M%C3%A4rz-2014.pdf.Google Scholar
OIV (2015) Weltkonjunkturbericht April 2015 of the international organisation of vine and wine. Available at: http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/2938/oiv-noteconjmars2015-de.pdf.Google Scholar
OIV (2016) Weltkonjunkturbericht of the international organisation of vine and wine. Available at: http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/4713/oiv-noteconjmars2016-de.pdf.Google Scholar
Piscitelli, Laura, Grinfeld, Michael, Lamba, Harbir, and Cross, Rod (1999) On entry and exit in response to aggregate shocks. Applied Economic Letters 6, 569–572.10.1080/135048599352619Google Scholar
Piscitelli, Laura, Cross, Rod, Grinfeld, Michael, and Lamba, Harbir (2000) A test for strong hysteresis. Computational Economics 15, 59–78.10.1023/A:1008638827537Google Scholar
Preisach, F. (1935) Über die magnetische Nachwirkung. Zeitschrift für Physik 94, 277–302.10.1007/BF01349418Google Scholar
Raurich, Xavier, Sala, Hector, and Sorolla, Valeri (2006) Unemployment, growth, and fiscal policy: New insights on the hysteresis hypothesis. Macroeconomic Dynamics 10, 285–316.10.1017/S136510050605022XGoogle Scholar
Steger, Thomas M. (2007) Flexibility, sectoral hysteresis, and downturns. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 128–148.10.1017/S1365100507050316Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture, USDA (2014) Real monthly country exchange rates. Available at https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/international-macroeconomic-data-set.aspxGoogle Scholar
Visintin, Augusto (2006) Mathematical models of hysteresis. In Bertotti, Giorgio and Mayergoyz, Isaak D. (eds.), The Science of Hysteresis, pp. 3–123. Burlington: Elsevier Inc.Google Scholar
Werner, Laura M. (2016) Hysterese im Agraraußenhandel: Analyse europäischer Weinexporte in die USA. Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e. V., Gewisola, 2016, Band 51, 171–180.Google Scholar