Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T20:57:30.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TREND-CYCLE DECOMPOSITIONS OF REAL GDP REVISITED: CLASSICAL AND BAYESIAN PERSPECTIVES ON AN UNSOLVED PUZZLE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2020

Chang-Jin Kim  and
Jaeho Kim
Chang-Jin Kim
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Jaeho Kim*
Affiliation:
University of Oklahoma
*
Address correspondence to: Jaeho Kim, Department of Economics, University of Oklahoma, Room 158, 308 Cate Center Drive Cate 1, Norman, OK 73072, USA. e-mail address: jaeho@ou.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While Perron and Wada (2009) maximum likelihood estimation approach suggests that postwar US real GDP follows a trend stationary process (TSP), our Bayesian approach based on the same model and the same sample suggests that it follows a difference stationary process (DSP). We first show that the results based on the approach should be interpreted with caution, as they are relatively more subject to the ‘pile-up problem’ than those based on the Bayesian approach. We then directly estimate and compare the two competing TSP and DSP models of real GDP within the Bayesian framework. Our empirical results suggest that a DSP model is preferred to a TSP model both in terms of in-sample fits and out-of-sample forecasts.

Keywords

Pile-up ProblemProfile LikelihoodIntegrated LikelihoodTrend Stationary ProcessDifference Stationary ProcessOut-of-Sample Prediction
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 394 - 418
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

An earlier version of this article has been included as Chapter 1 of Jaeho Kim's Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Washington. Chang-Jin Kim acknowledges financial support from the Bryan C. Cressey Professorship at the University of Washington. Jaeho Kim acknowledges financial support from the Grover and Creta Ensley Fellowship in Economic Policy at the University of Washington. We thank Dukpa Kim, Charles R. Nelson, Richard Startz, Harald Uhlig, and Eric Zivot for helpful comments.

References

Anderson, T. W. and Takemura, A. (1986) Why do noninvertible estimated moving averages occur?. Journal of Time Series Analysis 7, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antolin-Diaz, J., Drechsel, T. and Petrella, I. (2017) Tracking the slowdown in long-run GDP growth. Review of Economics and Statistics 99(2), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. O., Liseo, B. and Wolpert, R. L. (1999) Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters. Statistical Science 14(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beveridge, S. and Nelson, C. R. (1981) A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the ‘business cycle’. Journal of Monetary Economics 7(2), 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J. C. C. and Grant, A. L. (2016) On the observed-data deviance information criterion for volatility modeling. Journal of Financial Econometrics 14(4), 772–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Y.-W. and Chinn, M. D. (1997) Further investigation of the uncertain unit root in GNP. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 15(1), 68–73.Google Scholar
Chib, S. and Greenberg, E. (1994) Bayes inference in regression models with ARMA (p, q) errors. Journal of Econometrics 64(1–2), 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, L. J. (1992) Searching for a break in GNP. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10(3), 237–250.Google Scholar
Clark, P. K. (1987) The cyclical component of US economic activity. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102(4), 798–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJong, D. N. and Whiteman, C. H. (1993) Estimating moving average parameters: Classical pileups and Bayesian posteriors. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 11(3), 311–317.Google Scholar
Durbin, J. and Koopman, S. J. (2002) A simple and efficient simulation smoother for state space time series analysis. Biometrika 89(3), 603–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eo, Y. and Kim, C.-J. (2016) Markov-switching models with evolving regime-specific parameters: Are postwar booms or recessions all alike?. Review of Economics and Statistics 98(5), 940–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, A. L. and Chan, J. C. C. (2017) A Bayesian model comparison for trend-cycle decompositions of output. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 49(2–3), 525–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, K. M. (1975) A comparison of estimators for moving average processes. Unpublished paper, Australian Bureau of StatisticsGoogle Scholar
Kim, J. and Chon, S. (2020) Why are Bayesian trend-cycle decompositions of US real GDP so different?. Empirical Economics 58, 1339–1354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y. and Lee, J. (2004) A Bernstein-von Mises theorem in the nonparametric right-censoring model. Annals of Statistics 32(4), 1492–1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubach, T. and Williams, J. C. (2003) Measuring the natural rate of interest. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85(4), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y., Zeng, T. and Yu, J. (2013) Robust deviance information criterion for latent variable models. CAFE research paper 13.19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, S. and Startz, R. (2014) Is it one break or ongoing permanent shocks that explains US real GDP?. Journal of Monetary Economics 66, 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, J. C., Nelson, C. R. and Zivot, E. (2003) Why are the Beveridge-Nelson and unobserved-components decompositions of GDP so different?. The Review of Economics and Statistics 85(2), 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. R. and Kang, H. (1981) Spurious periodicity in inappropriately detrended time series. Econometrica 49(3), 741–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. R. and Kang, H. (1984) Pitfalls in the use of time as an explanatory variable in regression, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 2(1), 73–82.Google Scholar
Nelson, C. R. and Plosser, C. R. (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconmic time series: Some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics 10(2), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57(6), 1361–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perron, P. and Wada, T. (2009) Let's take a break: Trends and cycles in US real GDP. Journal of Monetary Economics 56(6), 749–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierce, D. A. (1971) Least squares estimation in the regression model with autoregressive-moving average errors. Biometrika 58(2), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, P. C. B. (1991) To criticize the critics: An objective Bayesian analysis of stochastic trends. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6(4), 333–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primiceri, G. E. (2005) Time varying structural vector autoregressions and monetary policy. Review of Economics Studies 72(3), 821–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sargan, J. D. and Bhargava, A. (1983) Maximum likelihood estimation of regression models with first order moving average errors when the root lies on the unit circle. Econometrica 51(3), 799–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotman, P. C. and Van Dijk, H. K. (1991) ‘On Bayesian routes to unit roots. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6(4), 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. L. and Naylor, J. C. (1987) A comparison of maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics) 36(3), 358–369.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P. and Van Der Linde, A. (2002) Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64(4), 583–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shephard, N. G. and Harvey, A. C. (1990) On the probability of estimating a deterministic component in the local level model. Journal of Time Series Analysis 11(4), 339–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. (1998) Median unbiased estimation of coefficient variance in a time-varying parameter model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 93, 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, J. H. and Watson, M. W. (2012) Disentangling the channels of the 2007-09 recession. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1, 81–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, K. and Satchell, S. E. (1989) Asymptotic properties of the maximum-likelihood and nonlinear least-squares estimators for noninvertible moving average models. Econometric Theory 5(3), 333–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zivot, E. and Andrews, D. W. K. (1992) Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20(1), 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar