Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:24:42.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extending the Resource-based View to the Mega-event: Entrepreneurial Rents and Innovation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Marc J. Dollinger ,
Xueling Li  and
Christine H. Mooney
Marc J. Dollinger
Affiliation:
Indiana University, USA
Xueling Li
Affiliation:
Jilin University, China
Christine H. Mooney
Affiliation:
Northern Illinois University, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The resource-based view of the firm has previously been expanded by including relational rents and rent from network and alliance participation. This paper extends the Dyer-Singh-Lavie synthesis by considering the special circumstances arising from the relationships, alliances, and networks of a mega-event, using the Beijing Olympics as a case for our analyses. The mega-event that is organized as a cartel increases the pricing power of the participants, produces relational rent, and is an ideal venue to introduce innovations. We discuss six factors that can influence the rent creation and capture from a mega-event and offer related propositions: periodicity (Proposition 1), event location (Proposition 2), governance structure (Proposition 3), media coverage (Proposition 4), network connectivity (Proposition 5), and membership rules (Proposition 6). We identify four innovation types associated with such mega-events and contend that the same factors can affect the entrepreneurial rent creation and capture within these innovation types (Proposition 7).

Keywords

Beijing Olympicsentrepreneurial rentsinnovationRBV theory北京奥运会创业租金创新企业资源观
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , July 2010 , pp. 195 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, S., & Barney, J. 2004. Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5): 621–635.Google Scholar
Alvarez, S., & Busenitz, L. 2001. The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6): 755–775.Google Scholar
Amit, R., & Shoemaker, P. 1993. Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1): 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baade, R., & Matheson, V. 2002. Bidding for the Olympics: Fool's gold? In Barrons, C., Ibrahimo, M., & Szymanski, S. (Eds.), Transatlantic sport, 127–151. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. 2001. Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
Barney, J., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
BOCOG. 2007. The official website of the Beijing 2008 Olympics. [Cited 3 September 2007.] Available from URL: http://en.beijing2008.cn/bocogGoogle Scholar
Brazeal, D., & Herbert, T. 1999. The genesis of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3): 29–45.Google Scholar
Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. 1997. Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1): 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business Week. 2008. Learning from the Olympics. August 18: 36–49.Google Scholar
Butler, J., & Priem, R. 2001. Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 22–66.Google Scholar
Caterwood, D., & Van Kirk, R. 1992. The complete guide to special event management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
China Daily. 2006. Olympic licensed products to go overseas. December 15. [Cited 18 September 2007.] Available from URL: http://chinadaily.cn/olympics/2006-12/15/content_6004891.htmGoogle Scholar
China Daily. 2007. Bank launches unique products. August 8. [Cited 18 September 2007.] Available from URL: http://chinadaily.com.cn/olympics/2007-08/08/content_6016947.htmGoogle Scholar
China Stakes. 2008. A challenge to Sohu's Beijing Olympic web ad exclusivity. [Cited 16 July 2008.] Available from URL: http://chinastakes.com/2008/7/a-challenge-to-sohus-beijingolympic-web-ad-exclusivity.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cho, H., & Pucik, V. 2005. Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6): 555–575.Google Scholar
Cortese, A. 2008. Before the Olympics, a parade of companies. New York Times, March 30: 20–21.Google Scholar
Dean, J. 2008. Ignore that logo under the tape! Wall Street Journal, August 16–17: A12.Google Scholar
Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. 1989. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35(12): 1504–1511.Google Scholar
Dyer, J., & Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 660–679.Google Scholar
Economist. 2008. Fun and games: A special report on the sports business. August 2: 1–16.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 543–576.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K., & Martin, J. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What arc they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(7): 1105–1121.Google Scholar
Freifeld, A. 2008. NBC Universal and Microsoft team up on unprecedented web offering for 2008 Beijing Olympics, January 6. [Cited 25 September 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRclease/idUS23524+07-Jan-2008+PRN20080107Google Scholar
Gould, J. P., & Ferguson, C. E. 1980. Microeconomic theory (5th ed.). Homewood, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
Grant, R. 2008. Contemporary strategy analysis (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, C. 1992. Hallmark tourist events: Impacts, management, and planning. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Hitt, M., Keats, B., & DeMarie, S. 1998. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21 st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12(4): 22–44.Google Scholar
Horne, J., & Manzenreiter, W. 2004. Accounting for mega-events: Forecast and actual impacts of the 2002 football World Cup finals on the host countries Japan/Korea. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 39(2): 187–203.Google Scholar
Horne, J., & Manzenreiter, W. 2006. An introduction to the sociology of sports mega-events. The Sociological Review, 54(2): 1–24.Google Scholar
Jana, R., Balfour, F., & Schwindt, O. 2008. Learning from the Olympics. Business Week, August 18: 36–45.Google Scholar
Jennings, J., & Houghton, L. 2002. It's not the big that eat the small … It's the fast that eat the slow. New York: Collins Business.Google Scholar
Kalwarski, T. 2008. The Beijing Olympics: Follow the gold. Business Week, August 11: 15.Google Scholar
Kang, S. 2008. Tiny detergent maker scores big as U.S. sponsor. Wall Street Journal, August 11: A9.Google Scholar
Lancette, C. 1996. Going for the gold: Small businesses really can profit from the Olympics. Entrepreneur Magazine. [Cited 17 April 2008.] Available from URL: http://www.entrepreneur.com/magazine/entrepreneur/1996/july/26620.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lavie, D. 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 638–658.Google Scholar
Lele, M. 2005. Monopoly rules: How to find, capture and control the most lucrative markets in any business. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Leow, J., Wang, S., & Crow, K. 2008. J & J wins favored status by curing statue fungus woes. Wall Street Journal, August 18: A16.Google Scholar
Longman, J. 1999. Olympics: Corruption is extensive, IOC official finds. New York Times, January 22: D1.Google Scholar
McCartney, G. 2005. Hosting a recurring mega-event: Visitor raison d'être. Journal of Sports Tourism, 10(2): 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mount, J., & Leroux, C. 1994. Assessing the effects of a mega-event: A retrospective study of the impact of the Olympic Games in the Calgary business sector. Festival Management and Event Tourism, 2(1): 15–23.Google Scholar
Nebel, E. 1983. Tourism and culture: A comparative perspective. New Orleans, LA: The University of New Orleans.Google Scholar
O'Conner, K. 1991. An historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new history of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1): 121–154.Google Scholar
Porter, M. 1980. Competitive analysis. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Preuss, H. 2000. Economics of the Olympic Games: Hosting the Games 1972–2000. Sydney: Walla Walla Press.Google Scholar
Preuss, H. 2004. The economics of staging the Olympics: A comparison of the Games 1972–2008. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, B., & Smith, J. 1991. The impact of a mega event on host region awareness: A longitudinal study. Journal of Travel Research, 30(1): 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. 2008. Olympic security is no game. Business Week, August 18: 46–48.Google Scholar
Roche, M. 2000. Mega-events and modernity: Olympics and expos in the growth of global culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rydell, R., Findling, J., & Pelle, K. 2000. Fair America: World's Fairs in the United States. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1934. Theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Spilling, O. 1993. Olympic dreams and Olympic realities: Entrepreneurs hip in the context of the 1994 Winter Olympics. Proceedings of the XI International Seminar on Marginal Regions, Oppland College, Lillehammer, Norway, August 1993.Google Scholar
Spilling, O. 1996. The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1): 91–103.Google Scholar
Stalk, G. 1988. Time – The next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 66 (July–August): 41–52.Google Scholar
State Council of the People's Republic of China. 2002. Decree 345: Regulations on the protection of Olympic symbols. [Cited 14 October 2009.] Available from URL: http://en.beijing2008.cn/98/69/article211986998.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Stieglitz, N., & Heine, K. 2007. Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Timmons, J., & Spinelli, V. 2003. New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century (6th ed.). Hightstown, NJ: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.Google Scholar
Whitson, D., & Horne, J. 2006. Underestimated costs and overestimated benefits? Comparing the outcomes of sports mega-events in Canada and Japan. The Sociological Review, 54(s2): 71–89.Google Scholar
Xu, X. 2006. Modernizing China in the Olympic spotlight: China's national identity and the 2008 Beijing Olympiad. The Sociological Review, 54(s2): 90–107.Google Scholar
Ye, J., & Fowler, G. 2007. An Olympian web war in China. Wall Street Journal, August 15: B1.Google Scholar