Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-02T05:54:40.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

First thoughts on Ns, Fs and the CEE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

John Hersee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 58 , Issue 403 , March 1974 , pp. 2 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page No 3 note † For more details of the International Baccalaureate see the article by J. B. Morgan in the Gazette for October 1973.

Page No 4 note † It must be emphasised that the figures are ‘rounded’ estimates to give ‘orders of magnitude’ only.

Page No 5 note † These are average figures and might well work out as 5 for both F and N in the first year, followed by 7 and 3 (or perhaps 4) respectively in the second year. In this way F and N pupils might work together, at any rate in the first year.

Page No 6 note † While appreciating that T is used in a different sense from that of the Working Paper, it is necessary to make this change to deal with the allocation of lessons. On a 35-lesson week 10 lessons might be available for ‘general studies’, including games; Mr. Merlane’s scheme would provide 10 lessons in a 40-lesson week.