Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T18:20:05.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some odd permutations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

Barry Lewis*
Affiliation:
Flat 1, 110 Highgate Hill, London N6 5HE

Extract

I recently stumbled on an identity (Theorem 2) that related two types of permutations. It looked like one of those serendipitous pieces of mathematics that led to a simple enumerative result; mostly when this happens it leads joyously to an enumerative proof that was ‘blindingly’ obvious. Except in this case, it wasn’t, I don’t think.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lewis, B., Beyond the Euler summation formula, Math. Gaz., 88 (November 2004) pp. 432440.10.1017/S0025557200176065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Graham, R. L., Knuth, D. E. and Patashnik, O., Concrete mathematics (2nd edn.), Addison-Wesley (1989).Google Scholar
3. Honsberger, Ross, Mathematical Gems III, Mathematical Association of America (1985).10.1090/dol/009CrossRefGoogle Scholar