Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T18:23:18.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plane Kinematics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Extract

Historical. That the problems of plane kinematics should have been studied for a long period is natural; they present themselves quite easily, and in simple fashion. At the end of the seventeenth century, and the beginning of the eighteenth century, De La Hire investigated roulettes, and to him also is due the introduction of the inflexion circle, as the aggregate of the points of a plane, subject to coplanar motion, which are instantaneously at inflexions of their paths. At a much later date, Ball (1) drew attention to that one point of the moving plane—upon the inflexion circle—which, in quite general motion, has four point contact with its approximately straight line path; or, has four consecutive positions in line.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References.

1. Proc. Royal. I. Acad., N.S. 27, p. 243 (1869–1874).Google Scholar
2. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (1), 7 (1876), p. 213: see also, Koenigs, , Leçons de Cinématique, Paris, 1897, p. 271.Google Scholar
3. Bulletin des sciences mathématiques. T. III. 2e série, p. 109. Here Darboux introduced the use of elliptic functions into the investigation of the three-bar curve.Google Scholar
4. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (1), 7 (1876), p. 17.Google Scholar
5. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (1), 7 (1876), pp. 136166, 166–172.Google Scholar
6. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 20 (1922), pp. 5984.Google Scholar
7. Journal Lond. Math. Soc, Vol. 19, Pt. 2, No. 74, April, 1944.Google Scholar
8. Proc. Lond, Math. Soc. (2), 21 (1923), pp. 140160.Google Scholar
9. Oeuvres, 1, II. Paris, 1899.Google Scholar
10. Comptes Rendus, 1853, Vol. 36, p. 1036.Google Scholar
11. C.f. p. 1125 of reference 8.Google Scholar
12. Phil. Mag. 1905, 6, S. ix, p. 803.Google Scholar
13. Ebene Kinematik, Hamburger Einzelschriften, 1938.Google Scholar
14. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. A, No. 875, vol. 244 (1952).Google Scholar