Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T23:22:36.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theories of Parallelism : an Historical Critique. By William Barrett FranklandM.A. , sometime Fellow of Clare College, Cambridge; Vicar of Wrawby. Pp. xviii + 70. 3s. net. 1910. (Cambridge Univ. Press.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 310 note * The “implicit definitions” (or “definitions by postulates”) so frequently used by Hilbert do not, in general, define things, and, though axioms are necessary at the beginning of logic, they have shown themselves to be unnecessary at the beginnings of arithmetic and geometry (cf. Russell, The Principles of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1903, pp. v, 4-5, 11, 429-430; Couturat, Les Principes des Mathématiques, Paris, 1905, pp. 157-159).

page 310 note † Cf. Couturat, Eev. de Métaphys. et de Morale, xiv., 190fi, pp. 210-211.