Article contents
Algebraic and Heegaard–Floer invariants of knots with slice Bing doubles
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 March 2008
Abstract
If the Bing double of a knot K is slice, then K is algebraically slice. In addition the Heegaard–Floer concordance invariants τ, developed by Ozsváth–Szabó, and δ, developed by Manolescu and Owens, vanish on K.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 144 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 403 - 410
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2008
References
REFERENCES
[1]Beliakova, A. and Wehrli, A.. Categorification of the colored Jones polynomial and Rasmussen invariant of links, arxiv.org/math.QA/0510382.Google Scholar
[2]Cha, J. C. Link concordance, homology cobordism, and Hirzebruch-type intersection form defects from towers of iterated p-covers, arxiv:0705.0088.Google Scholar
[3]Cha, J. C.The structure of the rational concordance group of knots. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 189 (2007), no.885.Google Scholar
[4]Cha, J. C. and Ko, K. H.. Signature invariants of covering links. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 358 (2006), 3399–3412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Cochran, T. and Orr, K.. Not all links are concordant to boundary links. Ann. of Math. (2) 138 (1993), 519–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Cimasoni, D.Slicing Bing doubles. Alg. Geom. Topol. 6 (2006) 2395–2415, msp.warwick.ac.uk/agt/2006/06/p083.xhtml.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Habiro, K.Claspers and finite type invariants of links. Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 1–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Harvey, S. Homology cobordism invariants and the Cochran-Orr-Teichner filtration of the link concordance group, arxiv.org/math.GT/0609378.Google Scholar
[9]Harvey, S. New phenomena in knot and link concordance (joint work with Tim Cochran and Constance Leidy); Oberwolfach Reports 3, to appear, mfo.de/programme/schedule/2006/32/OWR_2006_35.pdf.Google Scholar
[10]Kawauchi, A.On links not cobordant to split links. Topology 19 (1980), 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Kearton, C.The Milnor signatures of compound knots. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 76 (1979), 157–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Krushkal, V.Exponential separation in 4-manifolds. Geom. Topol. 4 (2000), 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Krushkal, V.On the relative slice problem and four-dimensional topological surgery. Math. Ann. 315 (1999), 363–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Krushkal, V.A counterexample to the strong version of Freedman's conjecture, arxiv.org/math. GT/0610865.Google Scholar
[15]Krushkal, V. and Teichner, P.. Alexander duality, gropes and link homotopy. Geom. Topol. 1 (1997), 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Levine, J.Knot cobordism groups in codimension two. Comment. Math. Helv. 44 (1969) 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Livingston, C.Computations of the Ozsváth–Szabó knot concordance invariant. Geom. Topol. 8 (2004), 735–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Livingston, C. and Melvin, P. Abelian invariants of satellite knots, geometry and topology (College Park, Md., 1983/84). 217–227. Lecture Notes in Math. 1167 (Springer, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Manolescu, C. and Owens, B.. A concordance invariant from the Floer homology of double branched covers, arxiv.org/math.GT/0508065.Google Scholar
[21]Ozsváth, P. and Szabó, Z.. Knot Floer homology and the four-ball genus. Geom. Topol. 7 (2003), 615–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Rasmussen, J. A. Khovanov homology and the slice genus. To appear in Invent. Math., arxiv.org/math/0306378.Google Scholar
[23]Schneiderman, R. and Teichner, P.. Whitney towers and the Kontsevich integral. Proceedings of the Casson Fest Geom. Topol. Monogr. 7 (2004) 101–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[24]Seifert, H.On the homology invariants of knots. Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. (2) 1 (1950), 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14
- Cited by