No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Cellular bases of generalised q-Schur algebras
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 August 2016
Abstract
Starting from their defining presentation by generators and relations, we develop the basic structure and representation theory of generalised q-Schur algebras of finite type.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 162 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 533 - 560
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2016
References
REFERENCES
[1]
Beilinson, A. A., Lusztig, G. and MacPherson, R.. A geometric setting for the quantum deformation of GL
n
. Duke Math. J.
61 (1990), 655–677.Google Scholar
[2]
Bourbaki, N.. Algebra I, Chapters 1–3 (Translated from the French). Reprint of the 1989 English translation “Elements of Mathematics” (Berlin) (Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1998).Google Scholar
[3]
Chriss, N. and Ginzburg, V.. Representation Theory and Complex Geometry (Birkhäuser Boston
1997).Google Scholar
[4]
Dipper, R. and James, G. D.. The q-Schur algebra. Proc. London Math. Soc.
59 (1989), 23–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]
Dipper, R. and James, G. D..
q-tensor space and q-Weyl modules. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
327 (1991), 251–282.Google Scholar
[6]
Donkin, S.. On Schur algebras and related algebras I. J. Algebra
104 (1986), 310–328.Google Scholar
[7]
Donkin, S.. On Schur algebras and related algebras II. J. Algebra
111 (1987), 354–364.Google Scholar
[8]
Donkin, S.. On Schur algebras and related algebras III. integral representations. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.
116 (1994), 37–55.Google Scholar
[9]
Doty, S.. Presenting generalised q-Schur algebras. Represent. Theory
7 (2003), 196–213 (electronic).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]
Doty, S.. Constructing quantised enveloping algebras via inverse limits of finite dimensional algebras. J. Algebra
321 (2009), 1225–1238.Google Scholar
[11]
Doty, S. and Giaquinto, A.. Generators and relations for Schur algebras. Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc.
7 (2001), 54–62 (electronic).Google Scholar
[12]
Doty, S. and Giaquinto, A.. Presenting Schur algebras. Internat. Math. Res. Not.
36 (2002), 1907–1944.Google Scholar
[13]
Goodman, F. and Graber, J.. On cellular algebras with Jucys Murphy elements. J. Algebra
330 (2011), 147–176.Google Scholar
[14]
Graham, J. J. and Lehrer, G. I.. Cellular algebras. Invent. Math.
123 (1996), 1–34.Google Scholar
[15]
Green, J. A.. Polynomial representations of GL
n
, Lecture Notes in Math. 830. (Springer–Verlag, Berlin–New York, 1980), (Second edition 2007.)Google Scholar
[16]
Humphreys, J. E.. Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory (Springer
1972).Google Scholar
[18]
Jimbo, M.. A q-analogue of
$U(\mathfrak{gl}(N+1))$
, Hecke algebras and the Yang–Baxter equation. Lett. Math. Phys.
11 (1986), 247–252.Google Scholar
![](https://static.cambridge.org/binary/version/id/urn:cambridge.org:id:binary:20170328125741200-0749:S0305004116000621:S0305004116000621_inline1.gif?pub-status=live)
[19]
Kashiwara, M., Miwa, T., Petersen, J.–U. H. and Yung, C. M.. Perfect crystals and q-deformed Fock spaces. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 2 (1996), 415–499.Google Scholar
[20]
König, S. and Xi, C.. On the structure of cellular algebras. Algebras and modules, II (Geiranger, 1996) CMS Conf. Proc., 24 (Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1998), 365–386.Google Scholar
[21]
König, S. and Xi, C.. Cellular algebras and quasi-hereditary algebras: a comparison. Electron. Res. Announc. Amer. Math. Soc.
5 (1999), 71–75 (electronic).Google Scholar
[22]
Lusztig, G.. Canonical bases in tensor products. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
89 (1992), 8177–8179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed