Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T19:10:18.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New upper bounds of the Hausdorff dimensions of graphs of continuous functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2003

FRANÇOIS ROUEFF
Affiliation:
TSI/CNRS URA 820, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications, 46 rue Barrault, 75634 Paris Cedex 13, France. e-mail: roueff@tsi.enst.fr

Abstract

Let $f$ be a real function, continuous over ${\mathbb R}^d$, $d\geq1$, and let $\Gamma(f,D)\,{\hbox{\sun}}\,\{(x,f(x))|x\in D\}$ be its graph over a domain $D\subseteq {\mathbb R}^d$ and $\Gamma{f}$ its graph over ${\mathbb R}^d$. The question naturally arises about which (and how) smoothness properties of $f$ are related to the Hausdorff dimension of $\Gamma(f)$. It is a well-known result that if $f$ is locally $\alpha$-Hölder, which we denote by $f\in\Fspaceloc{C}{\alpha}$, for some $\alpha>0$, then $\mathrm{dim}_{\mathcal{H}}(\Gamma(f))\leq \max(d,d+1-\alpha)$. Of course, in this inequality, one can replace $\alpha$ by the Höolder exponent of $f$, i.e. by $\sup\{s:f\in\Fspaceloc{C}{s}\}$. The question of the sharpness of the obtained bound yields different outputs depending on $f$: one can show that the equality is satisfied over some classes of functions (see [5] and [1, chapter 8]) but it is not difficult to find examples for which the inequality is strict. One should also mention that in the simple case of the well-known Weierstrass function, neither the equality nor a smaller upper bound could be proved (see [11] for related results).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)