Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T23:33:28.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the uniformization of plane direction fields, and of second-order partial differential operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Robert Finn
Robert Finn
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the topics covered by most textbooks on partial differential equations is the classification problem for second-order equations in the plane. In a typical treatment, it is shown that under some smoothness conditions on the coefficients, hyperbolic and parabolic equations can be reduced locally to normal form (uniformized) by an elementary procedure. For elliptic equations, the procedure fails unless an extraneous hypothesis (analyticity of the coefficients) is introduced. It is then pointed out that a different and much deeper method (essentially the general uniformization theorem) is effective for the elliptic case and even yields a global result. It is striking, but not surprising in view of recent developments on generalized solutions, that the alternate (global) procedure for elliptic equations requires much less smoothness of the coefficients than is needed for a sensible local result in the other cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 73 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 87 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Courant, R. and Hilbert, D.Methods of mathematical physics, vol. II (Interscienco Publishers; New York, 1962).Google Scholar
(2)Cinquini-Cibrario, M.e Cinquini, S.Equazioni a derivate parziali di tipo iperbolico (Edizioni Cremonese, Roma, 1964).Google Scholar
(3)Thomas, T. Y.Characteristic coordinates for hyperbolic equations in the large. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 33 (1947), 242–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(4)Milnor, J. W.Topology from the differentiable viewpoint (University Press of Virginia, 1965).Google Scholar
(5)Kamke, E.Differentialgleichungen reeller Funktionen (Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1930).Google Scholar
(6)Morrey, C. B.On the solutions of quasi-linear elliptic partial differential equations. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 43 (1938), 126–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Courant, R.Dirichlet's Principle, Conformal Mapping, and Minimal Surfaces (Interscience Publishers; New York, 1950).Google Scholar
(8)GoursatÉ, Cours d'analyse Mathématique, 6 éd., vol. 2 (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1942).Google Scholar
(9)Petrovski, I. G.Ordinary differential equations (English edition) (Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1966).Google Scholar