Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T19:46:57.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduction numbers and Hilbert polynomials of ideals in higher dimensional CohenMacaulay local rings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Yinghwa Wu
Yinghwa Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Throughout, (R, m) will denote a d-dimensional CohenMacaulay (CM for short) local ring having an infinite residue field and I an m-primary ideal in R. Recall that an ideal JI is said to be a reduction of I if Ir+1 = JIr for some r0, and a reduction J of I is called a minimal reduction of I if J is generated by a system of parameters. The concepts of reduction and minimal reduction were first introduced by Northcott and Rees12. If J is a reduction of I, define the reduction number of I with respect to J, denoted by rj(I), to be min {r0 Ir+1 = JIr}. The reduction number of I is defined as r(I) = min {rj(I)J is a minimal reduction of I}. The reduction number r(I) is said to be independent if r(I) = rj(I) for every minimal reduction J of I.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 111 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 47 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Huckaba, S.. Reduction numbers for ideals of analytic spread one. J. Algebra 108 (1987), 503512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Huckaba, S.. Reduction number for ideals of higher analytic spread. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 102 (1987), 4957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Huckaba, S. and Marley, T.. Depth properties of Rees algebras and associated graded rings. Preprint.Google Scholar
4Huneke, C.. Hilbert functions and symbolic powers. Michigan Math. J. 34 (1987), 293318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Marlby, T.. The coefficients of the Hilbert polynomial and the reduction number of an ideal. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 40 (1989), 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Marley, T.. The reduction number of an ideal and the local cohomology of the associated graded ring. Preprint.Google Scholar
7Matsumura, H.. Commutative Ring Theory (Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
8McAdam, S.. Asymptotic Prime Divisors. Lecture notes in Math. vol. 1023 (Springer-Verlag, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Morales, M.. Functions de Hilbert, genre gometrique d'une singularit quasi-homogne CohenMacaulay. C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sr. I Math. 301 (1985), 699702.Google Scholar
10Nagata, M.. Local Rings (Interscience, 1962).Google Scholar
11Northcott, D. G.. A note on the coefficients of the abstract Hilbert function. J. London Math. Soc. 35 (1960), 209214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Northcott, D. G. and Rees, D.. Reductions of ideals in local rings. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 50 (1954), 145158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Ooishi, A.. Genera and arithmetic genera of commutative rings. Hiroshima Math. J. 17 (1987), 4766.Google Scholar
14Ratliff, L. J. and Rush, D.. Two notes on reductions of ideals. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 27 (1978), 929934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Rees, D.. a-transforms of local rings and a theorem on multiplicities of ideals. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 57 (1961), 817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Sally, J. D.. On the associated graded ring of a local CohenMacaulay ring. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 17 (1977), 1921.Google Scholar
17Sally, J. D.. Stretched Gorenstein rings. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 20 (1977), 1926.Google Scholar
18Sally, J. D.. Tangent cones at Gorenstein singularities. Composito Math. 40 (1980), 167175.Google Scholar
19Sally, J. D.. CohenMacaulay local rings of embedding dimension e + d -2. J. Algebra 83 (1983), 393408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Sally, J. D.. Reductions, local cohomology and Hilbert functions of local ring. In Commutative Algebra: Durham 1981, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series no. 72 (Cambridge University Press, 1982), pp. 231241.Google Scholar
21Shah, K.. Coefficient ideals. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. to appear.Google Scholar
22Trung, N. V.. Reduction exponent and degree bound for the defining equations of graded rings. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1987), 229236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Valabrega, P. and Valla, G.. Form rings and regular sequences. Nagoya Math. J. 72 (1978), 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar