Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T21:38:19.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Continuing Clinicolegal Conundrum of the Boston State Hospital Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Extract

Whatever powers the Constitution has granted our government, involuntary mind control is not one of them….

[S]ubjecting a patient to the humiliation of being disrobed and then injected with drugs powerful enough to immobilize both body and mind is totally unreasonable by any standard.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rogers v. Okin, 478 F. Supp. 1342, 1367, 1369 (D. Mass. 1979).Google Scholar
Appelbaum, P.S. Gutheil, T.G., The Boston State Case: “Involuntary Mind Control,” the Constitution, and the “Right to Rot,” American Journal of Psychiatry 137(6): 720–23 (June 1980).Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, 634 F.2d 650 (1st Cir. 1980).Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 1, at 1365–67.Google Scholar
Id. at 1366–67.Google Scholar
Grinspoon, L., Ewalt, J.R., Shader, R.I., Schizophrenia, Pharmacotherapy, and Psychotherapy (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD) (1972).Google Scholar
Carlson, A., Pharmacological Approach to Schizophrenia, in Schizophrenia: Biological and Psychological Perspectives, ed., Usdin, G. (Brunner-Mazel, New York), at 102 (1975).Google Scholar
Berger, P.A., Hamburg, B., Mental Health: Progress and Problems, Daedalus 106: 261–76 (1977).Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 1, at 1360.Google Scholar
Klawans, H.L., Goetz, C.G., Perlick, S., Tardive Dyskinesia: Review and Update, American Journal of Psychiatry 137(8): 900–08 (August 1980); Gardos, G., Cole, J.O., Overview: Public Health Issues in Tardive Dyskinesia. American Journal of Psychiatry 137(7): 776–81 (July 1980).Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 1, at 1376.Google Scholar
See Gutheil, T.G., Restraint versus Treatment: Seclusion As Discussed in the Boston State Case, American Journal of Psychiatry 137(6): 718–19. (June 1980).Google Scholar
See Mattson, M.R., Sacks, M.H., Seclusion: Uses and Complications, American Journal of Psychiatry 135(10): 1210, 1212 (October 1978).Google ScholarPubMed
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. c. 123 §25.Google Scholar
The Massachusetts statute cited above is an example. See generally Brakel, S. Rock, R., The Mentally Disabled and the Law (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) (1971) at 253–54.Google Scholar
See, e.g., Meissner, W.W., Theories of Personality and Psychopathology: Classical Psychoanalysis, in Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry III (Kaplan, H.I., Freedman, A.M., Sabock, B.J. eds.) (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD) (1980).Google Scholar
See Appelbaum, P.S., Gutheil, T.G., Drug Refusal: A Study of Psychiatric Inpatients, American Journal of Psychiatry 137(3): 340–46 (March 1980); Gutheil, T.G., Shapiro, R., St. Clair, R.L., Legal Guardianship in Drug Refusal: An Illusory Solution, American Journal of Psychiatry 137(3): 347–52 (March 1980).Google ScholarPubMed
Gruenberg, E., The Social Breakdown Syndrome — Some Origins, American Journal of Psychiatry 123(12): 1481–89 (June 1967).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510 (1925); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966); Virginia, Loving v., 388 U.S. 1 (1967); Georgia, Stanley v., 394 U.S. 557 (1969).Google Scholar
Connecticut, Griswold v., 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar
Wade, Roe v., 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
See, e.g., Roe, Walen v., 429 U.S. 589, (1977).Google Scholar
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. c. 123 §12. See Plotkin, R., Limiting the Therapeutic Orgy: Mental Patients” Right to Refuse Treatment, Northwestern University Law Review 72(3): 461502 (1977).Google ScholarPubMed
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. c. 123 §25.Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 1, at 1361–62..Google Scholar
Roth, L.H., A Commitment Law for Patients, Doctors, and Lawyers, American Journal of Psychiatry 136(9): 1121, 1121–22. (September 1979).Google ScholarPubMed
Wexler, D.B., Mental Health Law and the Movement Toward Voluntary Treatment, California Law Review 62: 671–92 (1974).Google ScholarPubMed
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 1, at 1371, n. 38, citing Klein, Rennie v., 462F. Supp. 1131 (D.N.J. 1978) (individual action for injunction); Klein, Rennie v., 476 F. Supp. 1294 (D.N.J. 1979) (class action for injunction).Google Scholar
Klein, Rennie v., 476 F. Supp. 1294, 1307–15 (D.N.J. 1979).Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 3, at 660.Google Scholar
Mills, M.J., The Right of Involuntary Patients to Refuse Pharmacotherapy: What Is Reasonable, Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law (forthcoming, 1981).Google Scholar
Of course, such a process would accord psychiatric patients the protections set forth in Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418 (1979).Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 3.Google Scholar
Id. at 655–56.Google Scholar
Id. at 656–57.Google Scholar
Id. at 657.Google Scholar
Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. c. 123 § 1 et seq.; §25 providing the contrary assumption.Google Scholar
Rogers v. Okin, supra note 3, at 659.Google Scholar
Parham, v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584 (1979) (the Court of Appeals cited the comments made by the Court concerning the unwieldiness of requiring judicial determinations at all stages of decision-making for mental patients).Google Scholar
Id. at 660.Google Scholar
Id. at 653.Google Scholar
Colorado, Goedecke v., 603 P.2d 123 (Colo. 1979); In re K.K.B., 609 P.2d 747 (Okla. 1980); A.E. and R.R. v. Mitchell, ___ F. Supp. ___ (D. Utah 1980).Google Scholar