No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Goals of Informed Consent
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0097008500002227/resource/name/firstPage-S0097008500002227a.jpg)
- Type
- Editorial
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1980
References
Robinson, G. Merav, A., Informed Consent: Recall by Patients Tested Postoperatively, 22 Annals of Thoracic Surgery 209 (1976).Google Scholar
Cassileth, B. R. Zupkis, R.V. Sutton-Smith, K. March, V., Informed Consent — Why are Its Goals Imperfectly Realized? New England Journal of Medicine 302 (16): 896 (1980).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Annas, G.J. Glantz, L.H. Katz, B.K., Informed Consent to Human Experimentation: The Subjects Dilemma (Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.) (1977).Google Scholar
Grundner, T.M., On the Readability of Surgical Consent Forms, New England Journal of Medicine 302 (16): 900 (1980).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rennie, D., Informed Consent by ‘Well–Nigh Abject’ Adults, New England Journal of Medicine 302(16): 916 (1980).Google ScholarPubMed